Aminophylline and caffeine for reversal of adverse symptoms associated with regadenoson SPECT MPI

Buccal caffeine strips for reversal of adverse symptoms of vasodilator stress

BACKGROUND

Due to recurrent shortages of aminophylline, intravenous caffeine has emerged as a commonly used, safe and reliable method to treat adverse effects of vasodilator stress agents. We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of buccal caffeine strips which are rapidly absorbed, inexpensive, readily available, and simplify caffeine administration.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT MPI were assessed for the occurrence of symptoms during testing over an 11-week period at a single metropolitan hospital. Adverse symptoms, including their severity and duration, were recorded at the time of testing. Patient satisfaction was rated on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being the most satisfied). Patients received reversal with caffeine if symptoms were felt to be significant enough by the patient and physician performing the test. The treatment received alternated week to week between IV caffeine (60 mg) or 100 mg buccal caffeine strips. Caffeine was given at least 3 minutes after tracer injection. A rescue dose of IV caffeine was offered 10 minutes later if indicated.

RESULTS

Of the 122 patients enrolled in the study, 70 (57%) were included during buccal caffeine weeks and 52 (43%) during IV caffeine weeks, and only 28 (24%) received reversal with a caffeine agent. Seven (6%) received IV caffeine and 21 (17%) received buccal caffeine. There was no significant difference in symptom duration between IV and buccal caffeine after treatment (152.8 vs 163.4 seconds, P = 0.87). There was no significant difference in initial and final symptom severity between groups. Only 2 patients in the buccal group required rescue IV caffeine for ongoing symptoms and emesis. None of the IV group required a rescue dose. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the groups (2.8 vs 3.2, P = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Buccal caffeine strips are a safe, well tolerated, and effective initial strategy to reverse adverse effects of vasodilator stress in the minority of patients who request it. Buccal caffeine alone or with IV rescue caffeine was highly effective in reversing adverse effects and was free of major adverse clinical events.

Safety and efficacy of IV theophylline for regadenoson-associated side effect reversal

BACKGROUND

Aminophylline injection has been on an intermittent nation-wide shortage due to manufacturing delays leaving a need for an alternative reversal agent for regadenoson-associated side effects. Intravenous theophylline should be a logical acceptable pharmacological alternative; however, data regarding its safety and efficacy as a reversal agent are lacking.

METHODS

Utilizing electronic medical records at the University of Colorado hospital, we identified patients ≥ 18 years of age who had a pharmacologic stress test using regadenoson during periods of aminophylline shortage (3/1/2013 to 5/31/2013 and 4/1/2018 to 8/30/2018) in which theophylline was used as an alternative antidote for side effect reversal. Intravenous theophylline was prepared by the inpatient pharmacy to a concentration of 0.8 mg/mL in a total volume of 100 mL D5W. Specific side effects and side effect resolution were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 122 patients evaluated, theophylline was administered in doses ranging from 40 to 75 mg with the majority receiving 40 mg. Complete resolution of regadenoson side effects occurred in 98 patients with 12 experiencing partial resolution and 1 without resolution. No adverse effects or events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Due to limited availability of aminophylline, theophylline may be a safe and effective alternative to reverse regadenoson-associated side effects.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is a coronary hyperemic agent used to measure invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) of intermediate severity coronary stenosis.

AIM

To compare FFR assessment using adenosine with an alternate hyperemic agent, regadenoson.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were queried for studies comparing adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of FFR. Data on FFR, correlation coefficient and adverse events from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed by means of random effects model. Two tailed P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² test.

RESULTS

Five studies with 248 patients were included in the final analysis. All included patients and coronary lesions underwent FFR assessment using both adenosine and regadenoson. There was no significant mean difference between FFR measurement by the two agents [odds ratio (OR) = -0.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-0.02)-0.01, P = 0.88]. The cumulative correlation coefficient was 0.98 (0.96-0.99, P < 0.01). Three of five studies reported time to FFR with cumulative results favoring regadenoson (mean difference 34.31 s; 25.14-43.48 s, P < 0.01). Risk of adverse events was higher with adenosine compared to regadenoson (OR = 2.39; 95%CI: 1.22-4.67, P = 0.01), which most commonly included bradycardia and hypotension. Vast majority of the adverse events associated with both agents were transient.

CONCLUSION

The performance of regadenoson in inducing maximal hyperemia was comparable to that of adenosine. There was excellent correlation between the FFR measurements by both the agents. The use of adenosine, was however associated with higher risk of adverse events and longer time to FFR compared to regadenoson.

Regadenoson Stress Testing: A Comprehensive Review With a Focused Update

Regadenoson is a pharmacological stress agent that has been widely used since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008. For many years, dipyridamole and adenosine, which are non-selective adenosine receptor agonists, were more popular. However, these agents are less preferred now due to their undesirable adverse effects as compared to regadenoson. In the ADVANCE (ADenoscan Versus regAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation) phase 3 clinical trial, regadenoson demonstrated non-inferiority to adenosine for detecting reversible myocardial ischemia. This review summarizes the clinical utilities of regadenoson as the most widely used pharmacological stress agent. Moreover, the use of regadenoson has been documented in specific patient populations. Although regadenoson has established safety and efficacy in most patients with chronic diseases, there are equivocal results in the literature for other chronic diseases. It is warranted to highlight that the use of regadenoson has not been studied in patients of low socioeconomic class; it is a condition that carries a significant burden on the cardiovascular system.

Incidence of acute bronchospasm during systemic adenosine administration for coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is frequently used during coronary angiography to induce hyperaemia and allow operators to perform quantitative measurements of lesion severity. Acute bronchospasm is a recognised side effect relating to the activation of 'off target' A2B receptors. The true incidence of severe bronchospasm relating to adenosine administration is not known.

METHODS

Using an electronic patient database, we analysed 100,253 consecutive coronary angiograms over almost 19 years. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was measured under systemic adenosine in 9,440 cases.

RESULTS

Adenosine-related bronchospasm was reported in only five cases (0.05%). One case resulted in a life-threatening respiratory arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals the incidence of acute bronchospasm during FFR testing to be extremely low. Although rare, these reactions can be severe and are not simply limited to patients with brittle airways disease. Physicians should be aware of the utility of bolus intravenous aminophylline providing targeted therapy to reverse and treat adenosine-related bronchospasm.

Regadenoson Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children With Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery (CA) stenosis and occlusion in convalescent Kawasaki disease (KD) is progressive and may result in myocardial infarction. The use of regadenoson, a strong selective CA vasodilator with low side effect profile, for stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has not been studied in children with KD. The safety, feasibility, and diagnostic utility of regadenoson stress CMR was assessed in children with KD and CA abnormalities. A retrospective review of regadenoson stress CMR in children with convalescent KD was performed. Hemodynamics changes after regadenoson administration and adverse effects were recorded. First-pass perfusion was evaluated at rest and during pharmacologic stress. The results were compared with anatomic CA imaging. Forty-one stress CMR (18 sedated examinations, 44%) were performed successfully in 32 patients. Median age was 11.2 years (range 2.2 to 18.6) and weight 41 kg (range 13 to 93.4). Heart rate increased 66 ± 25% (p <0.005) after regadenoson. Minor adverse events occurred in 6 sedated and 1 unsedated patients. Hypoperfusion during stress occurred in 16 of 41 (39%), including 5 inducible, 9 inducible and fixed, and 2 fixed lesions. Late gadolinium enhancement was present in 10 of 16 with hypoperfusion and in 1 without hypoperfusion. Stress CMR had 100% positive agreement and >90% negative and overall agreement with moderate-to-severe CA stenoses. Four patients with hypoperfusion underwent revascularization for severe CA stenoses. In conclusion, regadenoson stress CMR is hemodynamically safe and feasible in children with KD and CA disease. It has excellent agreement with CA angiography and aided decision-making to proceed with revascularization.

Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: An ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR

Pharmacologic reversal of serious or intolerable side effects (SISEs) from vasodilator stress is an important safety and comfort measure for patients experiencing such effects. While typically performed using intravenous aminophylline, recurrent shortages of this agent have led to a greater need to limit its use and consider alternative agents. This information statement provides background and recommendations addressing indications for vasodilator reversal, timing of a reversal agent, incidence of observed SISE with vasodilator stress, clinical and logistical considerations for aminophylline-based reversal, and alternative non-aminophylline based reversal protocols.

Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: an ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR

Pharmacologic reversal of serious or intolerable side effects (SISE) from vasodilator stress is an important safety and comfort measure for patients experiencing such effects. While typically performed using intravenous aminophylline, recurrent shortages of this agent have led to a greater need to limit its use and consider alternative agents. This information statement provides background and recommendations addressing indications for vasodilator reversal, timing of a reversal agent, incidence of observed SISE with vasodilator stress, clinical and logistical considerations for aminophylline-based reversal, and alternative non-aminophylline based reversal protocols.

Theophylline and Caffeine as Alternatives During an Aminophylline Shortage

The latest aminophylline shortage has prompted a need for alternative reversal agents for pharmacological stress testing. Cardiac stress testing is common for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. Options for pharmacological stress test agents include adenosine, regadenoson, dipyridamole, and dobutamine, whereas aminophylline is the recommended reversal agent. Adenosine and dobutamine can be used as alternatives to regadenoson and dipyridamole to decrease or eliminate the use of aminophylline. Alternatives to aminophylline include theophylline and caffeine. It is important to efficiently identify alternatives during a drug shortage to maintain optimal patient outcomes.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging

In 2017, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology published many high-quality articles. In this review, we will summarize a selection of these articles to provide a concise review of the main advancements that have recently occurred in the field. In the first article of this 2-part series, we focused on publications dealing with positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. This review will place emphasis on myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography summarizing advances in the field including prognosis, safety and tolerability, the impact of imaging on management, and the use of novel imaging protocols.