The EXERRT trial: "EXErcise to Regadenoson in Recovery Trial": A phase 3b, open-label, parallel group, randomized, multicenter study to assess regadenoson administration following an inadequate exercise stress test as compared to regadenoson without exercise for myocardial perfusion imaging using a SPECT protocol

Evaluating the use of pharmacological stress agents during single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging tests after inadequate exercise stress test

BACKGROUND

Past clinical trial findings suggest that the availability of regadenoson in a nuclear imaging center may affect real-world center practices related to the transition of patients from an inadequate exercise stress test (EST) to a pharmacological stress agent (PSA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a cross-sectional study using one-on-one telephone interviews with nuclear imaging center staff to facilitate survey development, followed by an online survey to evaluate patterns and processes around use of PSAs during single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in patients with inadequate ESTs. Of the 50 participants, 35 (70%) used only regadenoson, 3 (6%) only adenosine, 3 (6%) regadenoson and adenosine, 7 (14%) regadenoson and dipyridamole, and 2 (4%) all 3 agents for converting patients from an inadequate EST to a PSA. Nearly all centers (94%) used protocols to guide conversions. Of 12 centers using > 1 PSA, 11 reported regadenoson to be the most preferred PSA. Total staff time required from PSA transition to post-test monitoring was shortest for regadenoson.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to adenosine and dipyridamole, regadenoson is preferred by nuclear imaging center staff and associated with operational efficiencies after inadequate EST in real-world practice SPECT-MPI.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CXII: Adenosine Receptors: A Further Update

Our previous International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors (2011) contained a number of emerging developments with respect to this G protein-coupled receptor subfamily, including protein structure, protein oligomerization, protein diversity, and allosteric modulation by small molecules. Since then, a wealth of new data and results has been added, allowing us to explore novel concepts such as target binding kinetics and biased signaling of adenosine receptors, to examine a multitude of receptor structures and novel ligands, to gauge new pharmacology, and to evaluate clinical trials with adenosine receptor ligands. This review should therefore be considered a further update of our previous reports from 2001 and 2011. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Adenosine receptors (ARs) are of continuing interest for future treatment of chronic and acute disease conditions, including inflammatory diseases, neurodegenerative afflictions, and cancer. The design of AR agonists ("biased" or not) and antagonists is largely structure based now, thanks to the tremendous progress in AR structural biology. The A2A- and A2BAR appear to modulate the immune response in tumor biology. Many clinical trials for this indication are ongoing, whereas an A2AAR antagonist (istradefylline) has been approved as an anti-Parkinson agent.

P1 Receptor Agonists/Antagonists in Clinical Trials - Potential Drug Candidates of the Future

BACKGROUND

Adenosine mediates various physiological and pathological conditions by acting on its four P1 receptors (A1, A2A, A2B and A3 receptors). Omnipresence of P1 receptors and their activation, exert a wide range of biological activities. Thus, its modulation is implicated in various disorders like Parkinson's disease, asthma, cardiovascular disorders, cancer etc. Hence these receptors have become an interesting target for the researchers to develop potential therapeutic agents. Number of molecules were designed and developed in the past few years and evaluated for their efficacy in various disease conditions.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective is to provide an overview of new chemical entities which have crossed preclinical studies and reached clinical trials stage following their current status and future prospective.

METHODS

In this review we discuss current status of the drug candidates which have undergone clinical trials and their prospects.

RESULTS

Many chemical entities targeting various subtypes of P1 receptors are patented; twenty of them have crossed preclinical studies and reached clinical trials stage. Two of them viz adenosine and regadenoson are approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

CONCLUSION

This review is an attempt to highlight the current status, progress and probable future of P1 receptor ligands which are under clinical trials as promising novel therapeutic agents and the direction in which research should proceed with a view to come out with novel therapeutic agents.

Trials and Tribulations of Assessing New Imaging Protocols: Combining Vasodilator Stress With Exercise

Among all patients referred for stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), a substantial proportion in contemporary practice cannot exercise. Another group of patients are those who are thought to be able to achieve an adequate workload with treadmill (or bicycle) exercise but do not achieve at least 85% of maximum predicted heart rate without developing symptoms. There has been substantial interest and literature on the adjunctive use of vasodilator stress during the same visit to generate best-quality results for patients who do not exercise adequately. Current American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Guidelines recommend the possible use of vasodilator stress agents to supplement exercise in those patients who do not achieve target heart rate. However, optimal timing of administration is not clear. Herein, we summarize literature to date on the combination of vasodilator and exercise stress testing in light of the recently published Exercise to Regadenoson in Recovery Trial (EXERRT).

Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

This information statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology highlights advances in cardiac SPECT imaging and supports the incorporation of new technology and techniques in laboratories performing nuclear cardiology procedures. The document focuses on the application of the latest imaging protocols and the utilization of newer hardware and software options to perform high quality, state-of-the-art SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures. Recommendations for best practices of cardiac SPECT imaging are discussed, highlighting what imaging laboratories should be doing as the standard of care in 2018 to achieve optimal results (based on the ASNC 2018 SPECT guideline [Dorbala et al., J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y ]).

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging

In 2017, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology published many high-quality articles. In this review, we will summarize a selection of these articles to provide a concise review of the main advancements that have recently occurred in the field. In the first article of this 2-part series, we focused on publications dealing with positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. This review will place emphasis on myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography summarizing advances in the field including prognosis, safety and tolerability, the impact of imaging on management, and the use of novel imaging protocols.

Pharmacologic Stress Testing with MyocardialPerfusion Imaging

The preferred method for performing stress testing with myocardial perfusion imaging is physical exercise. However, many patients are unable to reach an adequate endpoint. As an alternative, various pharmacologic options are available, which are explored in this article.