CZT camera systems may provide better risk stratification for low-risk patients

Should we choose CT angiography first instead of SPECT/PET first for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease?

In patients presenting with chest pain, current guidelines recommend the use of coronary computed tomography angiography and single-photon emission tomography/positron emission tomography, both with equal class 1 indication and level of evidence A. There is no clear recommendation on which test should be used as a first-line test. The choice of the test should be based on individualized clinical risk assessment, patient characteristics, local expertise/availability, and patient preferences. In this context, it is fair to ask which non-invasive imaging test to choose. The debate reproduced in this article answers this question by summarizing the considerations in selecting present state-of-the-art criteria of the right test for the right patient to ensure efficient resource utilization, minimize unnecessary testing, and maximize diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy.

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging by cadmium zinc telluride single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to define the prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging by cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for prediction of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Studies published until November 2022 were identified by database search. We included studies using stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT to evaluate subjects with known or suspected CAD and providing primary data of adverse cardiovascular events. Total of 12 studies were finally included recruiting 36,415 patients. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the occurrence of adverse events was 2.17 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.78-2.65) and heterogeneity was 66.1% (P = 0.001). Five studies reported data on adjusted HR for the occurrence of adverse events. Pooled HR was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.44-1.98) and heterogeneity was 44.9% (P = 0.123). Seven studies reported data on unadjusted HR for the occurrence of adverse events. Pooled HR was 2.72 (95% CI, 2.00-3.70). Nine studies reported data useful to calculate separately the incidence rate of adverse events in patients with abnormal and normal myocardial perfusion. Pooled incidence rate ratio was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.39-4.06) and heterogeneity was 84.6% (P < 0.001). The funnel plot showed no evidence of asymmetry (P = 0.517). At meta-regression analysis, we found an association between HR for adverse events and presence of angina symptoms and family history of CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT is a valuable noninvasive prognostic indicator for adverse cardiovascular events in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Regional myocardial perfusion imaging in predicting vessel-related outcome: interplay between the perfusion results and angiographic findings

BACKGROUND

Despite myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) camera is largely used in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), no data are available on the prognostic value of a regional MPI evaluation. We evaluated the prognostic value of regional MPI by the CZT camera in predicting clinical outcomes at the vessel level in patients with available angiographic data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-one subjects with suspected or known CAD referred to 99mTc-sestamibi gated CZT-SPECT cardiac imaging and with available angiographic data were studied. Both regional total perfusion deficit (TPD) and ischemic TPD (ITPD) were calculated separately for each vascular territory (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery). The outcome end points were cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization. The prevalence of CAD ≥ 50%, regional stress TPD, and regional ITPD was significantly higher in vessels with events as compared to those without (both P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristics area under the curve for regional ITPD for the identification of vessel-related events was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.86). An ITPD value of 2.0% provided the best trade-off for identifying the vessel-related event. At multivariable analysis, both CAD ≥ 50% and ITPD ≥ 2.0% resulted in independent predictors of events.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional myocardial perfusion assessed by the CZT camera demonstrated good reliability in predicting vessel-related events in patients with suspected or known CAD.