Vasodilators and myocardial blood flow by CZT cameras: Make us see further

Myocardial blood flow evaluation with dynamic cadmium-zinc-telluride single-photon emission computed tomography: Bright and dark sides

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessment with non-invasive techniques represent an important tool to evaluate both coronary artery disease severity and extent. Currently, cardiac positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is the "gold standard" for the assessment of coronary function and provides accurate estimations of baseline and hyperemic MBF and MFR. Nevertheless, due to the high cost and complexity, PET-CT is not widely used in clinical practice. The introduction of cardiac-dedicated cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras has renewed researchers' interest on MBF quantitation by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Indeed, many studies evaluated MPR and MBF measurements by dynamic CZT-SPECT in different cohorts of patients with suspected or overt coronary artery disease. As well, many others have compared the values obtained by CZT-SPECT to the ones by PET-CT, showing good correlations in detecting significant stenosis, although with different and non-standardized cut-off values. Nevertheless, the lack of standardized protocol for acquisition, reconstruction and elaboration makes more difficult to compare different studies and to further assess the real advantages of MBF quantitation by dynamic CZT-SPECT in clinical routine. Many are the issues involved in the bright and dark sides of dynamic CZT-SPECT. They include different type of CZT cameras, different execution protocols, different tracers with different myocardial extraction fraction and distribution, different software packages with different tools and algorithms, often requiring manual post-processing elaboration. This review article provides a clear summary of the state of the art on MBF and MPR evaluation by dynamic CZT-SPECT and outlines the major issues to solve to optimize this technique.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography

In this review, we will summarize a selection of articles on single-photon emission computed tomography published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2022. The aim of this review is to concisely recap major advancements in the field to provide the reader a glimpse of the research published in the journal over the last year. This review will place emphasis on myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography summarizing advances in the field including in prognosis, non-perfusion variables, attenuation compensation, machine learning and camera design. It will also review nuclear imaging advances in amyloidosis, left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, cardiac innervation, and lung perfusion. We encourage interested readers to go back to the original articles, and editorials, for a comprehensive read as necessary but hope that this yearly review will be helpful in reminding readers of articles they have seen and attracting their attentions to ones they have missed.

Myocardial flow reserve estimation with contemporary CZT-SPECT and 99mTc-tracers lacks precision for routine clinical application

BACKGROUND

PET myocardial flow reserve (MFR) has established diagnostic and prognostic value. Technological advances have now enabled SPECT MFR quantification. We investigated whether SPECT MFR precision is sufficient for clinical categorization of patients.

METHODS

Validation studies vs invasive flow measurements and PET MFR were reviewed to determine global SPECT MFR thresholds. Studies vs PET and a SPECT MFR repeatability study were used to establish imprecision in SPECT MFR measurements as the standard deviation of the difference between SPECT and PET MFR, or test-retest SPECT MFR. Simulations were used to evaluate the impact of SPECT MFR imprecision on confidence of clinically relevant categorization.

RESULTS

Based on validation studies, the typical PET MFR categories were used for SPECT MFR classification (< 1.5, 1.5-2.0, > 2.0). Imprecision vs PET MFR ranged from 0.556 to 0.829, and test-retest imprecision was 0.781-0.878. Simulations showed correct classification of up to only 34% of patients when 1.5 ≤ true MFR ≤ 2.0. Categorization with high confidence (> 80%) was only achieved for extreme MFR values (< 1.0 or > 2.5), with correct classification in only 15% of patients in a typical lab with MFR of 1.8 ± 0.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Current SPECT-derived estimates of MFR lack precision and require further optimization for clinical risk stratification.

Assessment of the routine reporting of very low-dose exercise-first myocardial perfusion SPECT from a large-scale real-world cohort and correlation with the subsequent reporting of coronary stenosis at angiography

PURPOSE

Our study assesses the routine reporting of exercise ischemia using very low-dose exercise-first myocardial perfusion SPECT in a large number of patients and under real-life conditions, by evaluating correlations with the subsequent routine reporting of coronary stenosis by angiography and with factors that predict ischemia.

METHODS

Data from 13,126 routine exercise MPI reports, from 11,952 patients (31% women), using very low doses of sestamibi and a high-sensitivity cardiac CZT camera, were extracted to assess the reporting of significant MPI-ischemia (> 1 left ventricular segment), to determine the MPI normalcy rate in a group with < 5% pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 378), and to assess the ability of MPI to predict a > 50% coronary stenosis in patients with available coronary angiography reports in the 3 months after the MPI (n = 713).

RESULTS

The median effective patient dose was 2.51 [IQR: 1.00-4.71] mSv. The normalcy rate was 98%, and the MPI-ischemia rate was independently predicted by a known CAD, the male gender, obesity, and a < 50% LV ejection fraction, ranging from 29.5% with all these risk factors represented to 1.5% when there were no risk factors. A > 50% coronary stenosis was significantly predicted by MPI-ischemia, less significantly for mild (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.61 [1.26-1.96]) than for moderate-to-severe MPI-ischemia (4.05 [3.53-4.57]) and was also impacted by having a known CAD (2.17 [1.83-2.51]), by a submaximal exercise test (1.48 [1.15-1.81]) and being ≥ 65 years of age (1.43 [1.11-1.76]).

CONCLUSION

Ischemia detected using a very low-dose exercise-first MPI protocol in a large-scale clinical cohort and under real-life routine conditions is a highly significant predictor for the subsequent reporting of coronary stenosis, although this prediction is enhanced by other variables. This weakly irradiating approach is amenable to being repeated at shorter time intervals, in target patient groups with a high probability of MPI-ischemia.