Clinical implications of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisition

Measuring myocardial blood flow using dynamic myocardial perfusion SPECT: artifacts and pitfalls

Dynamic acquisition allows absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion and flow reserve, offering an alternative to overcome the potential limits of relative quantification, especially in patients with balanced multivessel coronary artery disease. SPECT myocardial perfusion is widely available, at lower cost than PET. Dynamic cardiac SPECT is now feasible and has the potential to be the next step of comprehensive perfusion imaging. In order to help nuclear cardiologists potentially interested in using dynamic perfusion SPECT, we sought to review the different steps of acquisition, processing, and reporting of dynamic SPECT studies in order to enlighten the potentially critical pitfalls and artifacts. Both patient-related and technical artifacts are discussed. Key parameters of the acquisition include pharmacological stress, radiopharmaceuticals, and injection device. When it comes to image processing, attention must be paid to image-derived input function, patient motion, and extra-cardiac activity. This review also mentions compartment models, cameras, and attenuation correction. Finally, published data enlighten some facets of dynamic cardiac SPECT while several issues remain. Harmonizing acquisition and quality control procedures will likely improve its performance and clinical strength.

Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion agents (13N, 15O-H2O and 82Rb) incorporating various kinetic models on older 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Thus, rMBF in regions of TMS can serve as a reference "truth" to evaluate low-end accuracy of various PET systems and software packages (SWPs). Using 82Rb on a contemporary 3D-PET-CT system, we sought to determine whether currently available SWP can accurately and precisely measure rMBF in regions of known TMS.

RESULTS

Median rMBF (in mL/min/g) and COV in regions of TMS were 0.71 [IQR 0.52-1.02] and 0.16 with 4DM; 0.41 [0.34-0.54] and 0.10 with 4DM-FVD; 0.66 [0.51-0.85] and 0.11 with Cedars; 0.51 [0.43-0.61] and 0.08 with Emory-Votaw; 0.37 [0.30-0.42], 0.07 with Emory-Ottawa, and 0.26 [0.23-0.32], COV 0.07 with HeartSee.

CONCLUSIONS

SWPs varied widely in low end accuracy based on measurement of rMBF in regions of known TMS. 3D PET using 82Rb and HeartSee software accurately (0.26 mL/min/g, consistent with established values) and precisely (COV = 0.07) quantified rMBF in regions of TMS. The Emory-Ottawa software yielded the next-best accuracy (0.37 mL/min/g), though rMBF was higher than established gold-standard values in ~ 5% of the resting scans. 4DM, 4DM-FDV, Cedars and Emory-Votaw SWP consistently resulted values higher than the established gold standard (0.71, 0.41, 0.66, 0.51 mL/min/g, respectively), with higher interscan variability (0.16, 0.11, 0.11, and 0.09, respectively).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05286593, Registered December 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286593 .

Indicators of abnormal PET coronary flow capacity in detecting cardiac ischemia

Coronary flow capacity (CFC) categorizes severity of left ventricular (LV) ischemia by PET myocardial blood flow (MBF). Our objective was to correlate abnormal CFC with other indicators of regional ischemia. Data were examined retrospectively for 231 patients evaluated for known/suspected CAD who underwent rest and regadenoson-stress ⁸²Rb PET/CT. MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were quantified, from which CFC was categorized as Normal CFC (1), Minimally reduced (2), Mildly reduced (3), Moderately reduced (4), and Severely reduced (5) for the three main arterial territories as well as globally. Relative perfusion summed stress score (SSS) and systolic phase contraction bandwidth (BW) were assessed. Accuracy to detect arteries with CFC ≥ 4 was highest for a Regional Index combining SSS and BW (88 ± 3%). A Global Index formed from stress ejection fraction, SSS and BW was the most accurate means of identifying patients with global CFC ≥ 4 (84 ± 3%). Arteries with abnormal CFC derived from absolute myocardial blood flow measurements are accurately identified by composite parameters combining regionally aberrant relative perfusion patterns and asynchrony.