Associations between coronary/aortic 18F-sodium fluoride uptake and pro-atherosclerosis factors in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

Role of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography in imaging atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis involving vascular beds across the human body remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Coronary and peripheral artery disease, which are almost universally a result of atherosclerotic plaque, can manifest clinically as myocardial infarctions, ischemic stroke, or acute lower-limb ischemia. Beyond imaging myocardial perfusion and blood-flow, nuclear imaging has the potential to depict the activity of the processes that are directly implicated in the atherosclerotic plaque progression and rupture. Out of several tested tracers to date, the literature is most advanced for 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. In this review, we present the latest data in the field of atherosclerotic 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging, discuss the advantages and limitation of the techniques, and highlight the aspects that require further research in the future.

PET Radiotracers in Atherosclerosis: A Review

Traditional atherosclerosis imaging modalities are limited to late stages of disease, prior to which patients are frequently asymptomatic. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging allows for the visualization of metabolic processes underscoring disease progression via radioactive tracer, allowing earlier-stage disease to be identified. 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) uptake largely reflects the metabolic activity of macrophages, but is unspecific and limited in its utility. By detecting areas of microcalcification, 18F-Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) uptake also provides insight into atherosclerosis pathogenesis. Gallium-68 DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) PET has also shown potential in identifying vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques with high somatostatin receptor expression. Finally, 11-carbon (11C)-choline and 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMCH) tracers may identify high-risk atherosclerotic plaques by detecting increased choline metabolism. Together, these radiotracers quantify disease burden, assess treatment efficacy, and stratify risk for adverse cardiac events.

Novel PET Applications and Radiotracers for Imaging Cardiovascular Pathophysiology

PET allows the assessment of cardiovascular pathophysiology across a wide range of cardiovascular conditions. By imaging processes directly involved in disease progression and adverse events, such as inflammation and developing calcifications (microcalcifications), PET can not only enhance our understanding of cardiovascular disease, but also, as shown for 18F-sodium fluoride, has the potential to predict hard endpoints. In this review, the recent advances in disease activity assessment with cardiovascular PET, which provide hope that this promising technology could be leveraged in the clinical setting, shall be discussed.

NaF-PET Imaging of Atherosclerosis Burden

The method of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) of atherosclerosis was introduced 12 years ago. This approach is particularly interesting because it demonstrates microcalcification as an incipient sign of atherosclerosis before the development of arterial wall macrocalcification detectable by CT. However, this method has not yet found its place in the clinical routine. The more exact association between NaF uptake and future arterial calcification is not fully understood, and it remains unclear to what extent NaF-PET may replace or significantly improve clinical cardiovascular risk scoring. The first 10 years of publications in the field were characterized by heterogeneity at multiple levels, and it is not clear how the method may contribute to triage and management of patients with atherosclerosis, including monitoring effects of anti-atherosclerosis intervention. The present review summarizes findings from the recent 2¾ years including the ability of NaF-PET imaging to assess disease progress and evaluate response to treatment. Despite valuable new information, pertinent questions remain unanswered, not least due to a pronounced lack of standardization within the field and of well-designed long-term studies illuminating the natural history of atherosclerosis and effects of intervention.