Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: What do they Mean for Cardiac CT?

Computed tomography-based calcium scoring in cadaver leg arteries: Influence of dose, reader, and reconstruction algorithm

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT) might be a good diagnostic test to accurately quantify calcium in vascular beds but there are multiple factors influencing the quantification. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different computed tomography protocol settings in the quantification of calcium in the lower extremities using modified Agatston and volume scores.

METHODS

Fresh-frozen human legs were scanned at different tube current protocols and reconstructed at different slice thickness. Two different iterative reconstruction protocols for conventional CT images were compared. Calcium was manually scored using modified Agatston and volume scores. Outcomes were statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and mean absolute and relative differences were plotted in Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Of the 20 legs, 16 had CT detectable calcifications. Differences between thick and thin slice reconstruction protocols were 129 Agatston units and 125% for Agatston and 78.4 mm³ and 57.8% for volume (all p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were found between low and high tube current protocols. Differences between iDose⁴ and IMR reconstruction protocols for modified Agatston were 34.2 Agatston units and 17.7% and the volume score 33.5 mm³ and 21.2% (all p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Slice thickness reconstruction and reconstruction method protocols influenced the modified Agatston and volume scores in leg arteries, but tube current and different observers did not have an effect. This data emphasizes the need for standardized quantification of leg artery calcifications. Possible implications are in the development of a more universal quantification method, independent of the type of scan and vasculature.

Motion compensation for aortic valves using partial angle CT reconstructions motion compensation of cardiac valve CT

PURPOSE

A motion compensation method that is aimed at correcting motion artifacts of cardiac valves is proposed. The primary focus is the aortic valve.

METHODS

The method is based around partial angle reconstructions and a cost function including the image entropy. A motion model is applied to approximate the cardiac motion in the temporal and spatial domain. Based on characteristic values for velocities and strain during cardiac motion, penalties for the velocity and spatial derivatives are introduced to maintain anatomically realistic motion vector fields and avoid distortions. The model addresses global elastic deformation, but not the finer and more complicated motion of the valve leaflets.

RESULTS

The method is verified based on clinical data. Image quality was improved for most artifact impaired reconstructions. An image quality study with Likert scoring of the motion artifact severity on a scale from 1 (highest image quality) to 5 (lowest image quality/extreme artifact presence) was performed. The biggest improvements after applying motion compensation were achieved for strongly artifact impaired initial images scoring 4 and 5, resulting in an average change of the scores by -0.59 ± 0.06 and -1.33 ± 0.03, respectively. In case of artifact free images, a chance to introduce blurring was observed and their average score was raised by 0.42 ± 0.03.

CONCLUSION

Motion artifacts were consistently removed and image quality improved.

Deep learning-based coronary artery motion estimation and compensation for short-scan cardiac CT

PURPOSE

During a typical cardiac short scan, the heart can move several millimeters. As a result, the corresponding CT reconstructions may be corrupted by motion artifacts. Especially the assessment of small structures, such as the coronary arteries, is potentially impaired by the presence of these artifacts. In order to estimate and compensate for coronary artery motion, this manuscript proposes the deep partial angle-based motion compensation (Deep PAMoCo).

METHODS

The basic principle of the Deep PAMoCo relies on the concept of partial angle reconstructions (PARs), that is, it divides the short scan data into several consecutive angular segments and reconstructs them separately. Subsequently, the PARs are deformed according to a motion vector field (MVF) such that they represent the same motion state and summed up to obtain the final motion-compensated reconstruction. However, in contrast to prior work that is based on the same principle, the Deep PAMoCo estimates and applies the MVF via a deep neural network to increase the computational performance as well as the quality of the motion compensated reconstructions.

RESULTS

Using simulated data, it could be demonstrated that the Deep PAMoCo is able to remove almost all motion artifacts independent of the contrast, the radius and the motion amplitude of the coronary artery. In any case, the average error of the CT values along the coronary artery is about 25 HU while errors of up to 300 HU can be observed if no correction is applied. Similar results were obtained for clinical cardiac CT scans where the Deep PAMoCo clearly outperforms state-of-the-art coronary artery motion compensation approaches in terms of processing time as well as accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Deep PAMoCo provides an efficient approach to increase the diagnostic value of cardiac CT scans even if they are highly corrupted by motion.

Evaluation of an integrated 3D-printed phantom for coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction algorithm

INTRODUCTION

3D-printed imaging phantoms are now increasingly available and used for computed tomography (CT) dose optimisation study and image quality analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the integrated 3D-printed cardiac insert phantom when evaluating iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) protocols.

METHODS

The 3D-printed cardiac insert phantom was positioned into a chest phantom and scanned with a 16-slice CT scanner. Acquisitions were performed with CCTA protocols using 120 kVp at four different tube currents, 300, 200, 100 and 50 mA (protocols A, B, C and D, respectively). The image data sets were reconstructed with a filtered back projection (FBP) and three different IR algorithm strengths. The image quality metrics of image noise, signal-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for each protocol.

RESULTS

Decrease in dose levels has significantly increased the image noise, compared to FBP of protocol A (P < 0.001). As a result, the SNR and CNR were significantly decreased (P < 0.001). For FBP, the highest noise with poor SNR and CNR was protocol D with 19.0 ± 1.6 HU, 18.9 ± 2.5 and 25.1 ± 3.6, respectively. For IR algorithm, the highest strength (AIDR3Dstrong ) yielded the lowest noise with excellent SNR and CNR.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IR algorithm and increasing its strengths have reduced noise significantly and thus increased the SNR and CNR when compared to FBP. Therefore, this integrated 3D-printed phantom approach could be used for dose optimisation study and image quality analysis in CCTA protocols.

Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia

Cardiac imaging has a pivotal role in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic heart disease. SPECT is most commonly used for clinical myocardial perfusion imaging, whereas PET is the clinical reference standard for the quantification of myocardial perfusion. MRI does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation, similar to echocardiography, which can be performed at the bedside. CT perfusion imaging is not frequently used but CT offers coronary angiography data, and invasive catheter-based methods can measure coronary flow and pressure. Technical improvements to the quantification of pathophysiological parameters of myocardial ischaemia can be achieved. Clinical consensus recommendations on the appropriateness of each technique were derived following a European quantitative cardiac imaging meeting and using a real-time Delphi process. SPECT using new detectors allows the quantification of myocardial blood flow and is now also suited to patients with a high BMI. PET is well suited to patients with multivessel disease to confirm or exclude balanced ischaemia. MRI allows the evaluation of patients with complex disease who would benefit from imaging of function and fibrosis in addition to perfusion. Echocardiography remains the preferred technique for assessing ischaemia in bedside situations, whereas CT has the greatest value for combined quantification of stenosis and characterization of atherosclerosis in relation to myocardial ischaemia. In patients with a high probability of needing invasive treatment, invasive coronary flow and pressure measurement is well suited to guide treatment decisions. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses as well as the future technological potential of each imaging modality.

Improving head and neck CTA with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction techniques

AIM

To compare image quality of head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MIR) algorithms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The raw data of 34 studies were simultaneously reconstructed with FBP, HIR (iDose(4), Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands), and with a prototype version of a MIR algorithm (IMR, Philips Healthcare). Objective (contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR], vascular contrast, automatic vessel analysis [AVA], stenosis grade) and subjective image quality (ranking at level of the circle of Willis, carotid bifurcation, and shoulder) of the five reconstructions were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Vascular contrast was significantly higher in both the circle of Willis and carotid bifurcation with both levels of MIR compared to the other reconstruction methods (all p<0.0001). The CNR was highest for high MIR, followed by low MIR, high HIR, mid HIR and FBP (p<0.001 except low MIR versus high HIR; p>0.33). AVA showed most complete carotids in both MIR-levels, followed by high HIR (p>0.08), mid HIR (p<0.023) and FBP (p<0.010), vertebral arteries completeness was similar (p=0.40 and p=0.06). Stenosis grade showed no significant differences (p=0.16). High HIR showed the best subjective image quality at the circle of Willis and carotid bifurcation level, followed by mid HIR. At shoulder level, low MIR and high HIR were ranked best, followed by high MIR.

CONCLUSION

Objectively, MIR significantly improved the overall image quality, reduced image noise, and improved automated vessel analysis, whereas FBP showed the lowest objective image quality. Subjectively, the highest level of HIR was considered superior at the level of the circle of Willis and the carotid bifurcation, and along with the lowest level of MIR for the origins of the neck arteries at shoulder level.

The impact of a new model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on prosthetic heart valve related artifacts at reduced radiation dose MDCT

To assess the impact of hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) and novel model-based iterative reconstruction (IMR) and dose reduction on prosthetic heart valve (PHV) related artifacts and objective image quality. One transcatheter and two mechanical PHVs were embedded in diluted contrast-gel, inserted in an anthropomorphic phantom and imaged stationary with retrospectively ECG-gated computed tomography. Eight acquisitions were obtained of each PHV at 120 kV, 600 mAs (routine), 300 and 150 mAs (reduced dose). Data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), IR and IMR. Hypodense and hyperdense artifact volumes were quantified using two threshold filters. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios were calculated. Artifact volumes differed significantly between reconstruction algorithms for all PHVs (P < 0.005). Compared to FBP, IR decreased overall hypodense and hyperdense artifact volumes; at 150 mAs by 53 and 20 % (IR) and 67 and 23 % (IMR), respectively and significantly increased SNR and CNR at all doses (P < 0.012). Even at reduced dose, IMR resulted in higher image quality than routine dose FBP and IR. Iterative reconstruction and particularly IMR significantly reduce PHV-related artifacts and improve objective image quality in non-pulsatile conditions, even in reduced-dose images. Also, this study suggests that IMR allows for more radiation dose reduction in comparison to hybrid IR while maintaining high image quality.