Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: An Update

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease observed in a small proportion of patients after acute pulmonary embolism (PE). CTEPH has a high morbidity and mortality rate, related to the PH severity, and a poor prognosis, which mirrors the right ventricular dysfunction involvement. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) reduces pulmonary vascular resistance, making it the treatment of choice and should be offered to operable CTEPH patients, as significant symptomatic and prognostic improvement has been observed. Moreover, these patients may also benefit from the advances made in surgical techniques and pulmonary hypertension-specific medication. However, not all patients are eligible for PEA surgery, as some have either distal pulmonary vascular obstruction and/or significant comorbidities. Therefore, surgical candidates should be carefully selected by an interprofessional team in expert centers. This review aims at making an overview of the risk factors and latest developments in diagnostic tools and treatment options for CTEPH.

The Role of Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Failure

Heart failure is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality burden affecting approximately 1-2% of adults in developed countries, mounting to over 10% in individuals aged >70 years old. Heart failure is characterized by a prothrombotic state and increased rates of stroke and thromboembolism have been reported in heart failure patients compared with the general population. However, the impact of antithrombotic therapy on heart failure remains controversial. Administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is the obvious (and well-established) choice in heart failure patients with cardiovascular comorbidity that necessitates their use, such as coronary artery disease or atrial fibrillation. In contrast, antithrombotic therapy has not demonstrated any clear benefit when administered for heart failure per se, i.e. with heart failure being the sole indication. Randomized studies have reported decreased stroke rates with warfarin use in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but at the expense of excessive bleeding. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants have shown a better safety profile in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation compared with warfarin, however, current evidence about their role in heart failure with sinus rhythm is inconclusive and further research is needed. In the present review, we discuss the role of antithrombotic therapy in heart failure (beyond coronary artery disease), aiming to summarize evidence regarding the thrombotic risk and the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents in patients with heart failure.

Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the Netherlands

Background

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging treatment in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED). We describe the first safety and efficacy results of BPA in the Netherlands.

Methods

We selected all consecutive patients with inoperable CTEPH and CTED accepted for BPA treatment who had a six-month follow-up in the St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein and the Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) in Amsterdam. Functional class (FC), N‑terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), 6‑minute walking test distance (6MWD) and right-sided heart catheterisation were performed at baseline and six months after last BPA. Complications for each BPA procedure were noted.

Results

A hundred and seventy-two BPA procedures were performed in 38 patients (61% female, mean age 65 ± 15 years). Significant improvements six months after BPA treatment were observed for functional class (63% FC I/II to 90% FC I/II, p = 0.014), mean pulmonary artery pressure (−8.9 mm Hg, p = 0.0001), pulmonary vascular resistance (−2.8 Woods Units (WU), p = 0.0001), right atrial pressure (−2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006), stroke volume index (+5.7 ml/m², p = 0.009) and 6MWD (+48m, p = 0.007). Non-severe complications occurred in 20 (12%) procedures.

Conclusions

BPA performed in a CTEPH expert centre is an effective and safe treatment in patients with inoperable CTEPH.

Long-term clinical value and outcome of riociguat in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background

To improve clinical outcome, patients with inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) can be treated with riociguat. The aim of this study is to explore long-term outcomes and to compare our 'real world' data with previous research.

Methods

We included all consecutive patients with technical inoperable and residual CTEPH, in whom riociguat therapy was initiated from January 2014 onwards, with patients followed till January 2019. Survival, clinical worsening (CW), functional class (FC), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) were described yearly after riociguat initiation.

Results

Thirty-six patients (50% female, mean age 64.9 ± 12.1 years, 54% WHO FC III/IV and 6MWD 337 ± 138 m could be included, with a mean follow-up of 2.3 ± 1.2 years. Survival and CW-free survival three years after initiation of riociguat were 94% and 78%, respectively. The 6MWD per 10 m at baseline was a significant predictor (HR 0.90 [0.83-0.97], p = 0.009) for CW. At three years follow-up the WHO FC and 6MWD improved and NT-proBNP decreased compared to baseline.

Conclusion

Our study confirms that riociguat is an effective treatment in patients with technical inoperable and residual CTEPH at long-term follow-up. Although our results are consistent with previous studies, more 'real world' research is necessary to confirm long-term results.

Adaptation and validation of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) for the Netherlands

Background

The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) is the first disease-specific instrument for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) to assess patient-perceived symptoms, activity limitations and quality of life. To be able to use this questionnaire in the Netherlands, the aim of the study was to translate and validate this instrument for the Dutch-speaking population.

Methods

First the CAMPHOR was translated into Dutch (by means of a bilingual and a lay panel) and field-tested by means of cognitive debriefing interviews with ten PAH patients. For psychometric evaluation, 80 patients with PAH or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) were asked to complete the CAMPHOR twice over a two-week period. To test for construct validity, participants also completed the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP).

Results

The Dutch version of the CAMPHOR showed high internal consistency for all scales (Cronbach’s alpha 0.89–0.91) and excellent reproducibility over two weeks (reliability coefficients 0.87–0.91). Concurrent validity showed that the CAMPHOR scales correlated as expected with the NHP scales. The CAMPHOR was able to distinguish between patient groups based on self-reported general health status, disease severity and NYHA classification demonstrating evidence of known group validity. The CAMPHOR activity limitations scale correlated moderately with the distance walked during the 6‑minute walk test (r = −0.47, p < 0.01) and the symptoms scale with the Borg dyspnoea score (r = 0.51, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The Dutch version of the CAMPHOR is a reliable and valid measure of quality of life and health status in patients with PAH and CTEPH is recommended for use in routine care and in clinical research.