Three-dimensional rotational angiography in children with an aortic coarctation

Optimizing 3D Rotational Angiography for Congenital Cardiac Catheterization

The aim of the study was to determine the variables associated with high-quality (HQ) versus low-quality (LQ) three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) and create guides for optimization of approach to 3DRA in congenital cardiac catheterization (CCC). CCC has adopted 3DRA as a mainstay, but there has not been systematic analysis of approach to and factors associated with HQ 3DRA. This was a single-center, retrospective study of 3DRAs using Canon Infinix-I platform. Reconstructions were graded by 3 interventionalists. Quality was dichotomized into HQ and LQ. Univariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were performed. From 8/2016 to 12/2018, 208 3DRAs were performed in 195 CCCs; median age 7 years (2, 16), weight 23 kg (12, 57). The majority of 3DRAs were performed in patients with biventricular physiology (N = 137, 66%) and in pulsatile sites (N = 144, 69%). HQ 3DRA (N = 182, 88%) was associated with greater total injection volume [2.20 mL/kg (1.44, 3.29) vs. 1.62 mL/kg (1.10, 1.98), p = 0.005] and more dilute contrast solution [60% (50, 100) vs. 100% (60, 100), p = 0.007], but not with contrast volume administered (p = 0.2) on univariable analysis. On multivariable logistic regression, HQ 3DRA was significantly associated with patient weight [OR 0.97 (95% CI (0.94, 0.99), p = 0.018], total injection volume [OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.01, 1.07) p = 0.011], and percent contrast solution [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95, 1.00), p = 0.022]. These data resulted in creation of scatter plots and a novel 3DRA Nomogram for estimating the probability of HQ 3DRA. This is the first study to create evidence-based contrast dose guides and nomogram for 3DRA in CCC. HQ 3DRA was associated with lower weight, higher total injection volumes, and more dilute contrast solution.

Renaissance of Cardiac Imaging to Assist Percutaneous Interventions in Congenital Heart Diseases:The Role of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Multimodality Imaging

Percutaneous interventions have completely refashioned the management of children with congenital heart diseases (CHD) and the use of non-invasive imaging has become the gold standard to plan and guide these procedures in the modern era. We are now facing a dual challenge to improve the standard of care in low-risk patients, and to shift our strategies from the classic open chest surgery to imaging-guided percutaneous interventions in high-risk patients. Such rapid evolution of ultrasound technologies over the last 20 years have permitted the integration of transthoracic, transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography into the interventional workflow to improve image guidance and reduce radiation burden from fluoroscopy and angiography. Specifically, miniaturization of transesophageal probe and advances in three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques have enabled real-time 3D image guidance during complex interventional procedure, In addition, multimodality and fusion imaging techniques harness the strengths of different modalities to enhance understanding of anatomical and spatial relationship between different structures, improving communication and coordination between interventionalists and imaging specialists. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of 3D imaging modalities and multimodal fusion in procedural planning and live guidance of percutaneous interventions. At the present times, 3D imaging can no longer be considered a luxury but a routine clinical tool to improve procedural success and patient outcomes.

Use of rotational angiography in congenital cardiac catheterisations to generate three-dimensional-printed models

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional printing is increasingly utilised for congenital heart defect procedural planning. CT or MR datasets are typically used for printing, but similar datasets can be obtained from three-dimensional rotational angiography. We sought to assess the feasibility and accuracy of printing three-dimensional models of CHD from rotational angiography datasets.

METHODS

Retrospective review of CHD catheterisations using rotational angiography was performed, and patient and procedural details were collected. Imaging data from rotational angiography were segmented, cleaned, and printed with polylactic acid on a Dremel® 3D Idea Builder (Dremel, Mount Prospect, IL, USA). Printing time and materials' costs were captured. CT scans of printed models were compared objectively to the original virtual models. Two independent, non-interventional paediatric cardiologists provided subjective ratings of the quality and accuracy of the printed models.

RESULTS

Rotational angiography data from 15 catheterisations on vascular structures were printed. Median print time was 3.83 hours, and material costs were $2.84. The CT scans of the printed models highly matched with the original digital models (root mean square for Hausdorff distance 0.013 ± 0.003 mesh units). Independent reviewers correctly described 80 and 87% of the models (p = 0.334) and reported high quality and accuracy (5 versus 5, p = NS; κ = 0.615).

CONCLUSION

Imaging data from rotational angiography can be converted into accurate three-dimensional-printed models of CHD. The cost of printing the models was negligible, but the print time was prohibitive for real-time use. As the speed of three-dimensional printing technology increases, novel future applications may allow for printing patient-specific devices based on rotational angiography datasets.

Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography during Catheterization of Congenital Heart Disease - A ten Years' experience at a single center

This paper aims to assess the usability and advantages of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and its application in the cath lab. Up to now, its use in CHD is not widespread or standardized. We analyzed all patients with CHD who underwent a 3DRA at our facility between January 2010 and May 2019. The 3DRAs were evaluated for radiation exposure, contrast dye consumption, diagnostic utility and image quality. We performed 872 3DRAs. 3DRA was used in 67.1% of the cases for interventional procedures and in 32.9% for diagnostic purposes. Two different acquisition programs were applied. The median dose-area product (DAP) for all 872 rotations was 54.1 µGym² (21.7–147.5 µGym²) and 1.6 ml/kg (0.9–2.07 ml/kg) of contrast dye was used. Diagnostic utility of the generated 3D-model was rated superior to the native 3D angiography in 94% (819/872). 3DRA is an excellent and save diagnostic and interventional tool. However, 3DRA has not become a standard imaging procedure in pediatric cardiology up to now. Effort and advantage seems to be unbalanced, but new less invasive techniques may upgrade this method in future.

Safety and efficacy of stenting for aortic arch hypoplasia in patients with coarctation of the aorta

Background

Despite a successful repair procedure for coarctation of the aorta (CoA), up to two-thirds of patients remain hypertensive. CoA is often seen in combination with abnormal aortic arch anatomy and morphology. This might be a substrate for persistent hypertension. Therefore, we performed endovascular aortic arch stent placement in patients with CoA and concomitant aortic arch hypoplasia or gothic arch morphology. The goal of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of aortic arch stenting.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent stenting of the aortic arch at the University Medical Center Utrecht. Measurements collected included office blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medication, invasive peak-to-peak systolic pressure over the arch, and aortic diameters on three-dimensional angiography. Data on follow-up were obtained at the date of most recent outpatient visit.

Results

Twelve patients underwent stenting of the aortic arch. Mean follow-up duration was 14 ± 11 months. Mean peak-to-peak gradient across the arch decreased from 39 ± 13 mm Hg to 7 ± 8 mm Hg directly after stenting (p < 0.001). There were no major procedural complications. Mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 145 ± 16 mm Hg at baseline to 128 ± 9 mm Hg at latest follow-up (p = 0.014).

Conclusion

This retrospective study shows that stenting of the aortic arch is successful when carried out in a state-of-the-art manner. A direct optimal angiographic and haemodynamic result was shown. No major complications occurred during or after the procedure. At short- to medium-term follow-up a decrease in mean systolic blood pressure was observed.

Giving up knowledge is almost never a good idea: an interview with Dr Evan Zahn

The history of congenital interventional cardiology has seen numerous groundbreaking innovations typically related to the introduction of a new device or a novel treatment technique. Similarly, imaging of cardiac defects has changed dramatically over the past decades, although some of the advancements have seemed to omit the catheterisation laboratories. Rotational angiography, one of the imaging techniques for guidance of cardiac catheterisation currently referred to as "advanced", in fact was described already in 1960s.1 More recently its improved version, including three-dimensional reconstruction (3DRA), became a valuable intra-procedural imaging tool in interventional cardiology and neuroradiology.2 Dr Evan Zahn was one of the pioneers of 3DRA in the field of congenital cardiology, setting an example for many to follow. With his innovative publication and subsequent lecture at 2011 Pediatric and Adult Interventional Cardiac Symposium (PICS-AICS) on "The Emerging Use of 3-Dimensional Rotational Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease" he motivated many to explore benefits of this modality to strive for improved procedural outcomes and reduced patients' burden of cardiac catheterisation3. I was one of those to take Dr Zahn's thoughts and implement them into routine workflow.4-6 However, almost a decade after Dr Zahn shared his important work, despite tremendous efforts by teams from Utrecht, (Netherlands) and Columbus (Ohio, United States of America) to popularise 3D imaging in catheterisation laboratory during dedicated meetings, two-dimensional (2D) angiography does not seem to be threatened in many, otherwise-progressive, laboratories. During the recent 30th Japanese Pediatric Interventional Cardiology (JPIC) meeting I had the opportunity to ask Dr Zahn why giving up knowledge is almost never a good idea, what is technology's natural order of things, and why the technology has to be more than just exciting, pretty, and new.

Pros, cons and future perspectives - three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease

Step changes in angiographic imaging are not commonplace. Since the move from analogue to digital and flat detector plates, two-dimensional imaging technology has certainly evolved but not jumped forward. Of all the routine imaging techniques used in cardiology, angiography has been the last modality to embrace the third dimension. Although the development of rotational angiography was initially for the benefit of neuroimaging and fusion of cross sectional datasets was aimed at the treatment of descending aortic pathology, interventional physicians in congenital and structural cardiology have immersed themselves in this technology over the last 10 years. Like many disruptive technologies, its introduction has divided opinion. We aimed to explore the mindset of those in the field of interventional cardiology who are driving imaging forward. These structured interviews recorded during the 21^st Pediatric and Adult Interventional Cardiac Symposium illustrate the challenges and sticking points as well as giving an insight into the direction of travel for three-dimensional imaging and fusion techniques. Covering a wide range of career development, seniority and experience, the interviewees in this article are probably responsible for the majority of the published literature on invasive three-dimensional imaging in congenital heart disease.

Three-dimensional rotational angiography in congenital heart disease: Present status and evolving future

Three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) enables volumetric imaging through rotation of the C-arm of an angiographic system and real-time 3D reconstruction during cardiac catheterization procedures. In the field of congenital heart disease (CHD), 3D-RA has gained considerable traction, owing to its capability for enhanced visualization of spatial relationships in complex cardiac morphologies and real time image guidance in an intricate interventional environment. This review provides an overview of the current applications, strengths, and limitations of 3D-RA acquisition in the management of CHD and potential future directions. In addition, issues of dosimetry, radiation exposure, and optimization strategies will be reviewed. Further implementation of 3D-RA will be driven by patient benefits relative to existing 3D imaging capabilities and fusion techniques balanced against radiation exposure.

Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Literature Review

Cardiac catheterization is a commonly used form of imaging and treatment in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Traditionally, two-dimensional conventional angiography was the method used, but since 2000 three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) is increasingly used in the field of cardiology in both adult and pediatric patients. To investigate the use and applications of 3DRA in pediatric congenital cardiology, literature was systematically reviewed and 29 eligible articles were found. Those showed that 3DRA is already a greatly valued diagnostic and therapeutic technique in pediatric cardiology. However, the literature misses well-designed clinical, homogeneous, multicenter, prospective studies recording data in a standardized manner. These studies are necessary to ensure proper data analysis and to investigate the true advantages of 3DRA and how it exactly benefits the patients.

Dramatic Dose Reduction in Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography After Implementation of a Simple Dose Reduction Protocol

Previously, median effective dose (ED) of 1.6 mSv per three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) has been reported. This study evaluated ED and image quality in 3DRA after implementation of a simple dose reduction protocol in pediatric catheterizations. Simple conversion factors between 3DRA ED and readily available parameters at the cathlab were determined. The dose reduction protocol consisted of frame reduction (60-30 frames/s (f/s)), active collimation of the X-ray beam, usage of a readily available low dosage program, and a pre-3DRA run check. EDs were calculated with Monte Carlo PCXMC 2.0. Three observers blindly assessed 3DRA image quality of the dose reduction and normal-dose cohort. Between October 2014 and October 2015, 84 patients (median age 4.3 years) underwent 100 3DRAs with a median ED of 0.54 mSv (0.12-2.2) using the dose reduction protocol. Median ED in the normal-dose cohort (17 3DRAs) was 1.6 mSv (1.2-4.9). Image quality in the dose reduction cohort remained excellent. Correlations between ED and dose area product (DAP) and ED and skin dose were found with a ρ of 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. ED exposure of the entire catheterization was reduced to 2.64 mSv. Introduction of a simple protocol led to 66% dose reduction in 3DRA and 79% in the entire catheterization. 3DRA image quality in this group remained excellent. In 3DRA ED correlates well with DAP and skin dose, parameters readily available at the cathlab.