1
|
Miyashita K, Ninomiya K, Tobe A, Masuda S, Kotoku N, Kageyama S, Revaiah PC, Tsai TY, Wang B, Garg S, Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Long-term outcomes following bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2024:1-17. [PMID: 39049728 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2024.2375340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The higher scaffold thrombosis rates observed with the first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) compared to conventional drug-eluting stents were likely due in part to bioresorbable polymers having insufficient radial strength, necessitating larger strut profiles. Meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes from the first-generation Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) showed that this period of excess risk ended at 3 years. Therefore, current attention has been focused on improving early outcomes by increasing the scaffold's tensile strength and reducing strut thickness. AREAS COVERED This review summaries the lessons learned from the first-generation BRS. It updates the long-term clinical outcomes of trials evaluating the ABSORB BVS and metallic alloy-based BRS. In addition, it reviews the next-generation BRSs manufactured in Asia. EXPERT OPINION Critical areas to improve the performance and safety of biodegradable scaffolds include further development in material science, surface modification, delivery systems, and long-term follow-up studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Miyashita
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Kai Ninomiya
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Akihiro Tobe
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shinichiro Masuda
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nozomi Kotoku
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shigetaka Kageyama
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Pruthvi C Revaiah
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Tsung-Ying Tsai
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Bo Wang
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Scot Garg
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Yoshinobu Onuma
- The College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core laboratory, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shi Q, Zhang B, Wang X, Fei J, Qin Q, Zheng B, Chen M. Safety and efficacy of a novel 3D-printed bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in a porcine model. ASIAINTERVENTION 2023; 9:133-142. [PMID: 37736208 PMCID: PMC10507451 DOI: 10.4244/aij-d-22-00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Background The effect of 3D-printed bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) in coronary heart disease has not been clarified. Aims We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed BRS with that of metallic sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). Methods Thirty-two BRS and 32 SES were implanted into 64 porcine coronary arteries. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at 14, 28, 97, and 189 days post-implantation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histopathological analyses were performed at each assessment. Results All stents/scaffolds were successfully implanted. All animals survived for the duration of the study. QCA showed the two devices had a similar stent/scaffold-to-artery ratio and acute percent recoil. OCT showed the lumen area (LA) and scaffold/stent area (SA) of the BRS were significantly smaller than those of the SES at 14 and 28 days post-implantation (14-day LA: BRS vs SES 4.52±0.41 mm2 vs 5.69±1.11 mm2; p=0.03; 14-day SA: BRS vs SES 4.99±0.45 mm2 vs 6.11±1.06 mm2; p=0.03; 28-day LA: BRS vs SES 2.93±1.03 mm2 vs 4.82±0.74 mm2; p=0.003; 28-day SA: BRS vs SES 3.86±0.98 mm2 vs 5.75±0.71 mm2; p=0.03). Both the LA and SA of the BRS increased over time and were similar to those of the SES at the 97-day and 189-day assessments. SEM and histomorphological analyses showed no significant between-group differences in endothelialisation at each assessment. Conclusions The novel 3D-printed BRS showed safety and efficacy similar to that of SES in a porcine model. The BRS also showed a long-term positive remodelling effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuping Shi
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingang Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jintao Fei
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiao Qin
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jackson-Smith E, Zioupos S, Banerjee P. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus conventional drug-eluting stents across time: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Open Heart 2022; 9:e002107. [PMID: 36288820 PMCID: PMC9615997 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to reduce the rate of late adverse events observed in conventional drug-eluting stents (DES) by dissolving once they have restored lasting patency. OBJECTIVES Compare the safety and efficacy of BVS versus DES in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease across a complete range of randomised controlled trial (RCT) follow-up intervals. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from inception through 5 January 2022 for RCTs comparing the clinical outcomes of BVS versus DES. The primary safety outcome was stent/scaffold thrombosis (ST), and the primary efficacy outcome was target lesion failure (TLF: composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (ID-TLR)). Secondary outcomes were patient-oriented composite endpoint (combining all-death, all-MI and all-revascularisation), its individual components and those of TLF. Studies were appraised using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.4. RESULTS 11 919 patients were randomised to receive either BVS (n=6438) or DES (n=5481) across 17 trials (differing follow-up intervals from 3 months to 5 years). BVS demonstrated increased risk of ST across all timepoints (peaking at 2 years with risk ratio (RR): 3.47; 95% CI 1.80 to 6.70; p=0.0002). Similarly, they showed increased risk of TLF (peaking at 3 years, RR: 1.35; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.70; p=0.01) resulting from high rates of TVMI and ID-TLR. Though improvements were observed after device dissolution (5-year follow-up), these were non-significant. All other outcomes were statistically equivalent. Applicability to all BVS is limited by 91% of the BVS group receiving Abbott's Absorb. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis demonstrates that current BVS are inferior to contemporary DES throughout the first 5 years at minimum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Prithwish Banerjee
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Centre for Sports, Exercise & Life Sciences (CSELS), Coventry University Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry, UK
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wan YD, Wang DY, Deng WQ, Lai SJ, Wang X. Bioresorbable scaffolds vs. drug-eluting stents on short- and mid-term target lesion outcomes in patients after PCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:949494. [PMID: 36158817 PMCID: PMC9492944 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.949494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While current concerns about bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) are centered on late or very late scaffold thrombosis, less attention had been paid to short- and mid-term clinical outcomes. This review aimed to compare the short- and mid-term outcomes between BRS and drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared BRS vs. DES was conducted by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases from inception until 19 April 2022 (language limited to English or Chinese). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) within 12 months, defined as a composite of target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and cardiac death. The secondary outcomes were in-stent diameter stenosis (DS%) provided by intraluminal imaging. Results A total of 13 studies were eligible and were included in this review (N = 9,702 patients). The follow-up duration ranged from 6 months to 1 year. A significantly higher rate of TLF [RR, 1.22, 95% CI (1.03, 1.44)] driven by the higher rate of TVMI [RR, 1.39, 95% CI (1.09, 1.76)] was observed in the BRS group than in the DES group. The risk of TLR and cardiac death was similar between the groups. Also, compared with the DES group, the BRS group had a significantly higher in-stent DS% within 1 year [MD = 5.23, 95%CI (3.43, 7.04); I2 = 97%; p < 0.00001]. Conclusion Bioresorbable scaffolds were associated with an increased risk of target lesion failure within 1 year as compared with DES, driven by the increased rates of target vessel myocardial infarction. Also, the in-stent DS% seemed to be higher with BRS. Therefore, BRS was inferior to DES in terms of target lesion outcomes at short- or mid-term follow-up. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=327966, PROSPERO (CRD42022327966).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-di Wan
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Da-yang Wang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Cardiology, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-qi Deng
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Si-jia Lai
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xian Wang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Cardiology, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Xian Wang
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mazaev VP. Poor past and look forward. КАРДИОВАСКУЛЯРНАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ И ПРОФИЛАКТИКА 2021. [DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- V. P. Mazaev
- National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tijssen RYG, Kraak RP, Elias J, van Dongen IM, Kalkman DN, Nassif M, Sotomi Y, Asano T, Katagiri Y, Collet C, Piek JJ, Henriques JPS, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JGP, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Wykrzykowska JJ. Implantation techniques (predilatation, sizing, and post-dilatation) and the incidence of scaffold thrombosis and revascularisation in lesions treated with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: insights from the AIDA trial. EUROINTERVENTION 2018; 14:e434-e442. [PMID: 29688175 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-17-01152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Specific implantation strategies have been proposed for the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) to optimise outcomes. We aimed to analyse whether the occurrence of definite scaffold thrombosis (ScT) and target lesion revascularisation (TLR) in Absorb-treated AIDA patients was influenced by scaffold implantation techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS Absorb BVS implantation in 1,074 lesions was graded according to definitions of optimal implantation based on predilatation, sizing, and post-dilatation (PSP). Lesion-oriented outcomes (definite ScT and TLR) that occurred during a median follow-up of 707 days were related to the presence or absence of PSP. Of 1,074 lesions, 158 (14.7%) lesions met PSP criteria. The most prevalent reason for not meeting PSP criteria was inadequate sizing: 863 (94.2%). Definite ScT occurred in four of 158 PSP-treated lesions compared with 27 of 916 non PSP-treated lesions, with two-year KM estimates of 3.0% vs. 4.1% and an HR of 1.14 (p=0.811). TLR occurred in eight of 158 PSP-treated lesions compared with 61 of 916 non PSP-treated lesions, with KM estimates of 5.6% vs. 7.1% and an HR of 1.29 (p=0.492). CONCLUSIONS In AIDA, lesions that underwent scaffold implantation according to an optimised Absorb BVS implantation technique did not have lower rates of ScT and TLR compared to scaffold-treated lesions that did not meet PSP criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Yannick G Tijssen
- AMC Heartcenter, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barreira G, Costa JR, Costa R, Staico R, Chamie D, Slhessarenko JR, Tanajura LF, Abizaid A, Sousa A, Abizaid A. Serial intravascular ultrasound evaluation of the DESolve™ novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gentil Barreira
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - J. Ribamar Costa
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Ricardo Costa
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Rodolfo Staico
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Daniel Chamie
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Juliano R. Slhessarenko
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Luiz Fernando Tanajura
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Andrea Abizaid
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Amanda Sousa
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Alexandre Abizaid
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah R. Very-long-term efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Neth Heart J 2017; 25:649. [PMID: 28983788 PMCID: PMC5653540 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-017-1041-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Shah
- Section of Cardiology, University of Tennessee, School of Medicine, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elias J, van Dongen IM, Henriques JPS. The first-generation ABSORB BVS: awaiting dissolving outcomes. Neth Heart J 2017; 25:650-652. [PMID: 28913752 PMCID: PMC5653541 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-017-1042-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Elias
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - I M van Dongen
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P S Henriques
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cassese S, Husser O, Kastrati A. Adverse events with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine percutaneous coronary interventions: "coup de théâtre" or unfinished play? J Thorac Dis 2017; 9:2303-2307. [PMID: 28932531 PMCID: PMC5594123 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.74] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cassese
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Husser
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Adnan Kastrati
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- J P S Henriques
- Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J Elias
- Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|