1
|
Dahdal J, Bakker F, Svanerud J, Danad I, Driessen RS, Raijmakers PG, Harms HJ, Lammertsma AA, van de Hoef TP, Appelman Y, van Royen N, Knaapen P, de Waard GA. Validation of resting full-cycle ratio and diastolic pressure ratio with [ 15O]H 2O positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion. Heart Vessels 2024; 39:299-309. [PMID: 38367040 PMCID: PMC10920410 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-023-02356-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are invasive techniques used to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. These methods have been validated through perfusion imaging and clinical trials. New invasive pressure ratios that do not require hyperemia have recently emerged, and it is essential to confirm their diagnostic efficacy. The aim of this study was to validate the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) and the diastolic pressure ratio (dPR), against [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. A total of 129 symptomatic patients with an intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. All patients underwent cardiac [15O]H2O PET with quantitative assessment of resting and hyperemic myocardial perfusion. Within a 2 week period, coronary angiography was performed. Intracoronary pressure measurements were obtained in 320 vessels and RFR, dPR, and FFR were computed. PET derived regional hyperemic myocardial blood flow (hMBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) served as reference standards. In coronary arteries with stenoses (43%, 136 of 320), the overall diagnostic accuracies of RFR, dPR, and FFR did not differ when PET hyperemic MBF < 2.3 ml min-1 (69.9%, 70.6%, and 77.1%, respectively) and PET MPR < 2.5 (70.6%, 71.3%, and 66.9%, respectively) were considered as the reference for myocardial ischemia. Non-significant differences between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were found between the different indices. Furthermore, the integration of FFR with RFR (or dPR) does not enhance the diagnostic information already achieved by FFR in the characterization of ischemia via PET perfusion. In conclusion, the novel non-hyperemic pressure ratios, RFR and dPR, have a diagnostic performance comparable to FFR in assessing regional myocardial ischemia. These findings suggest that RFR and dPR may be considered as an FFR alternative for invasively guiding revascularization treatment in symptomatic patients with CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Dahdal
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Del Salvador, Salvador 364, 7500922, Santiago, Chile
| | - Frank Bakker
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Svanerud
- Coroventis Research AB, Ulls Väg 29A, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ibrahim Danad
- Utrecht University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel S Driessen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter G Raijmakers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Harms
- Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim P van de Hoef
- Utrecht University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande Appelman
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels van Royen
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Knaapen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guus A de Waard
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boerhout CKM, de Waard GA, Lee JM, Mejia-Renteria H, Lee SH, Jung JH, Hoshino M, Echavarria-Pinto M, Meuwissen M, Matsuo H, Madera-Cambero M, Eftekhari A, Effat MA, Murai T, Marques K, Doh JH, Christiansen EH, Banerjee R, Nam CW, Niccoli G, Nakayama M, Tanaka N, Shin ES, Chamuleau SAJ, van Royen N, Knaapen P, Escaned J, Kakuta T, Koo BK, Piek JJ, van de Hoef TP. Combined use of hyperemic and non-hyperemic pressure ratios for revascularization decision-making: From the ILIAS registry. Int J Cardiol 2023; 370:105-111. [PMID: 36372287 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of non-hyperaemic Pd/Pa and to determine its additional value when combined with the gold standard hyperaemic pressure ratio (FFR) to guide revascularization. METHODS In a large, multi-center, retrospective registry, we included a total of 2141 patients with a clinical indication for coronary angiography providing physiological data in 2726 vessels. A classification was made based on the FFR (cut-off value: 0.80) and non-hyperaemic Pd/Pa (cut-off value: 0.92) values and the primary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF) at 5-year follow-up. RESULTS Mean age was 63 ± 10.0 and 75% of the study population were men. Regression analysis showed an overall good correlation between FFR and non-hyperaemic Pd/Pa (r = 0.73, p < 0.005) and discordance was present in 17% of the vessels. Resting Pd/Pa was independently associated with TVF at 5-year follow-up (HR 0.08, 95%CI: 0.02-0.27; p < 0.005). The risk for TVF was the lowest in vessles with concordant normal pressure ratio's, with the highest risk in vessels with any abnormal pressure ratio in which revascularization was deferred. In these vessels, there was no difference in risk for TVF between the discordant and concordant abnormal values. CONCLUSION Abnormal pressure ratios in both non-hyperemic and hyperemic conditions portend important prognostic value. Combined application of FFR and non-hyperemic Pd/Pa efficiently identifies those vessels with concordant normal resting and hyperemic pressure ratios of which long-term clinical outcomes are excellent. These data lead to hypothesize that the decision to defer revascularization should potentially be based on combined non-hyperemic and hyperemic pressure ratios. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry (ILIAS Registry), NCT04485234.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joo Myung Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hernan Mejia-Renteria
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IDISSC, and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Seung Hun Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Hyun Jung
- Sejong General Hospital, Sejong Heart Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Masahiro Hoshino
- Gifu Heart Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mauro Echavarria-Pinto
- Hospital General ISSSTE Querétaro - Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico
| | | | - Hitoshi Matsuo
- Gifu Heart Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | | | - Ashkan Eftekhari
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mohamed A Effat
- Division of Cardiovascular Health and Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Tadashi Murai
- Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Tsuchiura city, Japan
| | - Koen Marques
- Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joon-Hyung Doh
- Department of Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
| | | | - Rupak Banerjee
- Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA; Research Services, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Department of Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Giampaolo Niccoli
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Rome, Italy
| | - Masafumi Nakayama
- Gifu Heart Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu, Japan; Toda Central General Hospital, Cardiovascular Center, Toda, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Tanaka
- Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eun-Seok Shin
- Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea
| | | | - Niels van Royen
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Knaapen
- Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier Escaned
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IDISSC, and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tsunekazu Kakuta
- Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Tsuchiura city, Japan
| | - Bon Kwon Koo
- Seoul National University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jan J Piek
- Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
van de Hoef TP, de Waard GA, Meuwissen M, Voskuil M, Chamuleau SAJ, van Royen N, Piek JJ. Invasive coronary physiology: a Dutch tradition. Neth Heart J 2020; 28:99-107. [PMID: 32780339 PMCID: PMC7419414 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-020-01461-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Invasive coronary physiology has been applied since the early days of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and has become a rapidly emerging field of research. Many physiology indices have been developed, tested in clinical studies, and are now applied in daily clinical practice. Recent clinical practice guidelines further support the use of advanced invasive physiology methods to optimise the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. This article provides a succinct review of the history of invasive coronary physiology, the basic concepts of currently available physiological parameters, and will particularly highlight the Dutch contribution to this field of invasive coronary physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T P van de Hoef
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - G A de Waard
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Meuwissen
- Department of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - M Voskuil
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S A J Chamuleau
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N van Royen
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J J Piek
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|