Research in medical education: practical impact on medical training and future challenges

Rethinking implementation science for health professions education: A manifesto for change

Implementation science approaches the challenges of translating evidence into practice as a matter of scientific inquiry. This conceptual paper uses an implementation science lens to examine the ways in which evidence from health professions education research is brought to bear on decision-making. The authors describe different decision-making contexts and the kinds of evidence they consider, and from this, they outline ways in which research findings might be better presented to support their translation into policy and practice. Reflecting on the nature of decision-making in health professions education and how decisions are made and then implemented in different health professions education contexts, the authors argue that researchers should align their work with the decision-making contexts that are most likely to make use of them. These recommendations reflect implementation science principles of packaging and disseminating evidence in ways that are meaningful for key stakeholders, that stem from co-creation of knowledge, that require or result in meaningful partnerships, and that are context specific and relevant.

Medical Educators' Perceptions of Research Culture in a Faculty of Health Sciences: A South African Study

Phenomenon: In South Africa, as with many other developing countries, a call has been made for institutions of higher learning to participate in more research and set the pace for societal transformation. At the Faculty of Health Sciences (FoHS), University of the Free State (UFS), numerous strategic efforts are focused on supporting and stimulating research. An essential prerequisite for the success of these vital efforts is to be aware of the research culture within the academic faculties. A peculiarity of medical colleges in South Africa is that medical faculties are in partnership with the government through the academic training hospitals; hence, staff appointment occurs through a joint structure with both the provincial Department of Health and the National Health Laboratory Services. So far, no known study has investigated research culture in this context (joint staff appointment). Approach: This study included elements of case study evaluation and improvement-oriented evaluation. We distributed to 242 educators a structured questionnaire to obtain perceptions of aspects of research, research processes, and existing research culture in the FoHS, UFS. Suggestions on how to improve the research culture also were obtained. The structured questionnaire was self-administered, consisted of closed and open-ended questions grouped into five main sections, and was distributed electronically and manually (hard copy) to participants. Findings: One-hundred-eleven questionnaires were returned (46% response rate). Motivation to do research varied by school and included career advancement (77%, School of Allied Health Professions); change the situation (80%, Academic support); develop individual skillset (67%, School of Nursing) and improve patient care (62%, School of Medicine). Perceived factors affecting research culture included limited funding and allocated time for research, minimal leadership support for research, and absence of research-related support structures as well as minimal teamwork/collaboration. Frustration was the most reported (negative) emotion (25%). Participants suggested that encouraging teamwork among staff, reducing workload to allow time for research, establishing a mentorship program, providing training on deficient skills, and more support from leadership would improve research culture. Insights: This present study reveals some of the factors that impact negatively on research, research culture, and productivity in a medical college in a resource-limited setting. While the benefits of joint staff appointment cannot be overemphasized, our findings highlight that the complex interplay between employers/stakeholders result in poorly executed joint appointment scheme/models (i.e., competitive approach) and creates numerous challenges that negatively impact research productivity and research culture. Recommendations suggested herein can be implemented by the FoHS and other medical colleges in similar contexts to improve research productivity and foster an enabling research culture.

The Hiker's Guide to the RIME Supplement: Choosing Directions in Research

In this Commentary, the authors seek to build on prior RIME commentaries by considering how researchers transition from worldviews, focal lengths, and research goals to research directions and methodological choices. The authors use the analogy of a hiker to illustrate how different researchers studying a similar phenomenon can choose among different research directions, which lead down different paths and offer different perspectives on a problem. Following the hiker analogy, the authors use the "Research Compass" to categorize the 15 research papers included in the 2020 Research in Medical Education supplement according to their research aim and corresponding methodological approach. The authors then discuss implications of the relative balance of these study types within this supplement and within health professions education research at large, emphasizing the critical importance of studying a topic from multiple vantage points to construct a richer and more nuanced understanding of health professions education challenges. The authors conclude by recognizing the challenges we face in the current era of COVID-19 and by calling health professions education researchers and practitioners to continue our collective efforts to improve learner education and patient care, as we together navigate the unfamiliar terrain of the present day.