1
|
Salzmann S, Laferton JAC, Shedden-Mora MC, Horn N, Gärtner L, Schröder L, Rau J, Schade-Brittinger C, Murmann K, Rastan A, Andrási TB, Böning A, Salzmann-Djufri M, Löwe B, Brickwedel J, Albus C, Wahlers T, Hamm A, Hilker L, Albert W, Falk V, Zimmermann T, Ismail I, Strauß B, Doenst T, Schedlowski M, Moosdorf R, Rief W. Pre-surgery optimization of patients' expectations to improve outcome in heart surgery: Study protocol of the randomized controlled multi-center PSY-HEART-II trial. Am Heart J 2022; 254:1-11. [PMID: 35940247 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The PSY-HEART-I trial indicated that a brief expectation-focused intervention prior to heart surgery improves disability and quality of life 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, to investigate the clinical utility of such an intervention, a large multi-center trial is needed to generalize the results and their implications for the health care system. The PSY-HEART-II study aims to examine whether a preoperative psychological intervention targeting patients' expectations (EXPECT) can improve outcomes 6 months after CABG (with or without heart valve replacement). EXPECT will be compared to Standard of Care (SOC) and an intervention providing emotional support without targeting expectations (SUPPORT). In a 3-arm multi-center randomized, controlled, prospective trial (RCT), N = 567 patients scheduled for CABG surgery will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC and EXPECT or SOC and SUPPORT. Patients will be randomized with a fixed unbalanced ratio of 3:3:1 (EXPECT: SUPPORT: SOC) to compare EXPECT to SOC and EXPECT to SUPPORT. Both psychological interventions consist of 2 in-person sessions (à 50 minute), 2 phone consultations (à 20 minute) during the week prior to surgery, and 1 booster phone consultation post-surgery 6 weeks later. Assessment will occur at baseline approx. 3-10 days before surgery, preoperatively the day before surgery, 4-6 days later, and 6 months after surgery. The study's primary end point will be patients' illness-related disability 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be patients' expectations, subjective illness beliefs, quality of life, length of hospital stay and blood sample parameters (eg, inflammatory parameters such as IL-6, IL-8, CRP). This large multi-center trial has the potential to corroborate and generalize the promising results of the PSY-HEART-I trial for routine care of cardiac surgery patients, and to stimulate revisions of treatment guidelines in heart surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Salzmann
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| | | | - Meike C Shedden-Mora
- Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nicole Horn
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Laura Gärtner
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lara Schröder
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jörn Rau
- Coordination Center for Clinical Trials (KKS), University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Kirsten Murmann
- Coordination Center for Clinical Trials (KKS), University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ardawan Rastan
- Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Térezia B Andrási
- Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Böning
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Löwe
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Brickwedel
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Albus
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thorsten Wahlers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alfons Hamm
- Department of Physiological and Clinical Psychology/ Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Lutz Hilker
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinic Karlsburg, Heart and Diabetes Center Mecklenburg-Western Pommerania, Karlsburg, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Falk
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Zimmermann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Issam Ismail
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernhard Strauß
- Institute of Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy, and Psychooncology, University Hospital Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Manfred Schedlowski
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany, and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rainer Moosdorf
- Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laferton JAC, Oeltjen L, Neubauer K, Ebert DD, Munder T. The effects of patients' expectations on surgery outcome in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prognostic factor meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2020; 16:50-66. [PMID: 33228474 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1854051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Patients' expectations are among the most frequently studied psychological prognostic factors in total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). So far, however, evidence on the effect of patients' preoperative expectations on surgery outcome is inconclusive. Heterogeneity of expectation constructs and the use of psychometrically not evaluated measurement instruments have constituted major obstacles for the integration of the current literature. Using a theory-based model of expectation constructs , this meta-analysis set out to disentangle the conflicting results in the current literature. Systematic literature searches yielded k = 46 studies (N = 10,465) that reported associations of preoperative expectations with postoperative pain, functioning and disability, and satisfaction. Random effects meta-analysis revealed a robust small association (r = .16; 95% CI .13, .19) between patients' positive preoperative expectations and better postoperative outcomes. This effect did not differ between THA and TKA, different outcome categories and different follow-up periods. Studies using psychometrically evaluated expectation measures reported significantly higher effects (r = .19; 95% CI .16, .22). Whether this effect varies among different expectation constructs remains unclear. High-quality studies using validated, multidimensional expectation measures are needed to further understand the role of different expectation constructs in THA and TKA surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes A C Laferton
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Division of Psychological Medicine, Department of Medicine, Health and Medical University Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Lara Oeltjen
- Department of Psychological Methods, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | - David D Ebert
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Munder
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laferton JAC, Kube T, Salzmann S, Auer CJ, Shedden-Mora MC. Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment. Front Psychol 2017; 8:233. [PMID: 28270786 PMCID: PMC5318458 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients’ expectations in the context of medical treatment represent a growing area of research, with accumulating evidence suggesting their influence on health outcomes across a variety of medical conditions. However, the aggregation of evidence is complicated due to an inconsistent and disintegrated application of expectation constructs and the heterogeneity of assessment strategies. Therefore, based on current expectation concepts, this critical review provides an integrated model of patients’ expectations in medical treatment. Moreover, we review existing assessment tools in the context of the integrative model of expectations and provide recommendations for improving future assessment. The integrative model includes expectations regarding treatment and patients’ treatment-related behavior. Treatment and behavior outcome expectations can relate to aspects regarding benefits and side effects and can refer to internal (e.g., symptoms) and external outcomes (e.g., reactions of others). Furthermore, timeline, structural and process expectations are important aspects with respect to medical treatment. Additionally, generalized expectations such as generalized self-efficacy or optimism have to be considered. Several instruments assessing different aspects of expectations in medical treatment can be found in the literature. However, many were developed without conceptual standardization and psychometric evaluation. Moreover, they merely assess single aspects of expectations, thus impeding the integration of evidence regarding the differential aspects of expectations. As many instruments assess treatment-specific expectations, they are not comparable between different conditions. To generate a more comprehensive understanding of expectation effects in medical treatments, we recommend that future research should apply standardized, psychometrically evaluated measures, assessing multidimensional aspects of patients’ expectations that are applicable across various medical treatments. In the future, more research is needed on the interrelation of different expectation concepts as well as on factors influencing patients’ expectations of illness and treatment. Considering the importance of patients’ expectations for health outcomes across many medical conditions, an integrated understanding and assessment of such expectations might facilitate interventions aiming to optimize patients’ expectations in order to improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes A C Laferton
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule BerlinBerlin, Germany; Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of MarburgMarburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kube
- Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Salzmann
- Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte J Auer
- Division of Psychotherapy and Psychiatry, University Hospital Lübeck Lübeck, Germany
| | - Meike C Shedden-Mora
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Theunissen M, Peters ML, Schepers J, Maas JW, Tournois F, van Suijlekom HA, Gramke HF, Marcus MA. Recovery 3 and 12 months after hysterectomy: epidemiology and predictors of chronic pain, physical functioning, and global surgical recovery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e3980. [PMID: 27367998 PMCID: PMC4937912 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000003980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is 1 important aspect of surgical recovery. To improve perioperative care and postoperative recovery knowledge on predictors of impaired recovery is essential. The aim of this study is to assess predictors and epidemiological data of CPSP, physical functioning (SF-36PF, 0-100), and global surgical recovery (global surgical recovery index, 0-100%) 3 and 12 months after hysterectomy for benign indication.A prospective multicenter cohort study was performed. Sociodemographic, somatic, and psychosocial data were assessed in the week before surgery, postoperatively up to day 4, and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Generalized linear model (CPSP) and linear-mixed model analyses (SF-36PF and global surgical recovery index) were used. Baseline data of 468 patients were collected, 412 (88%) patients provided data for 3-month evaluation and 376 (80%) patients for 12-month evaluation.After 3 and 12 months, prevalence of CPSP (numeric rating scale ≥ 4, scale 0-10) was 10.2% and 9.0%, respectively, SF-36PF means (SD) were 83.5 (20.0) and 85.9 (20.2), global surgical recovery index 88.1% (15.6) and 93.3% (13.4). Neuropathic pain was reported by 20 (5.0%) patients at 3 months and 14 (3.9%) patients at 12 months. Preoperative pain, surgery-related worries, acute postsurgical pain on day 4, and surgery-related infection were significant predictors of CPSP. Baseline level, participating center, general psychological robustness, indication, acute postsurgical pain, and surgery-related infection were significant predictors of SF-36PF. Predictors of global surgical recovery were baseline expectations, surgery-related worries, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, type of anesthesia, acute postsurgical pain, and surgery-related infection.Several predictors were identified for CPSP, physical functioning, and global surgical recovery. Some of the identified factors are modifiable and optimization of patients' preoperative pain status and psychological condition as well as reduction of acute postsurgical pain and surgery-related infection may lead to improvement of outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice Theunissen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht UMC+
- Correspondence: Maurice Theunissen, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht UMC+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands ()
| | - Madelon L. Peters
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | - Jan Schepers
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| | | | - Fleur Tournois
- Department of Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht/Orbis Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen
| | - Hans A. van Suijlekom
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco A.E. Marcus
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht UMC+
- Department of Anesthesiology, ICU, and Perioperative Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heisig SR, Shedden-Mora MC, von Blanckenburg P, Rief W, Witzel I, Albert US, Nestoriuc Y. What do women with breast cancer expect from their treatment? Correlates of negative treatment expectations about endocrine therapy. Psychooncology 2016; 25:1485-1492. [PMID: 26913587 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2015] [Revised: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients' negative treatment expectations can lead to nocebo-related side effects and non-initiation of treatment. This study aims to identify correlates of treatment expectations in patients with breast cancer before the start of endocrine therapy. METHODS Expectations were assessed in a cross-sectional sample of 166 patients with breast cancer after receiving treatment information. Side effect expectations (one item) and treatment necessity-concern balance (Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire) were assessed. Correlates were analyzed using regression analyses. The structure of treatment expectations was investigated using a network analysis. RESULTS About 25% of patients expressed negative expectations. Higher side effect expectations were associated with lower treatment efficacy expectations (ß = -0.20, p = 0.01), higher medication overuse beliefs (ß = 0.17, p = 0.01), and a negative treatment appraisal before study treatment information (ß = -0.17, p = 0.02). A negative necessity-concern balance was associated with lower treatment efficacy expectations (ß = 0.36, p < 0.001), lower adherence intention (ß = 0.21, p < 0.001), and no knowledge of tumor's receptor status (ß = 0.21, p < 0.001); furthermore, it was associated with higher medication harmfulness beliefs (ß = -0.16, p = 0.02), negative treatment pre-appraisal (ß = 0.15, p = 0.01), higher somatosensory amplification (ß = -0.14, p = 0.02), and higher education (ß = -0.12, p = 0.02). The most important network node was the concern that endocrine therapy disrupts life. CONCLUSION Negative treatment expectations before treatment start are mainly associated with psychological variables. These results are relevant for patient education in clinical settings. To improve expectations, clinicians might emphasize treatment efficacy and discuss general and specific medication concerns. Improving treatment knowledge could also be beneficial. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Heisig
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Meike C Shedden-Mora
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pia von Blanckenburg
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Department of Gynecology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yvonne Nestoriuc
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Auer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, Winkler A, Laferton JAC, Broadbent E, Rief W. Patients’ Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s12529-015-9500-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
7
|
Laferton JAC, Auer CJ, Shedden-Mora MC, Moosdorf R, Rief W. Optimizing preoperative expectations in cardiac surgery patients is moderated by level of disability: the successful development of a brief psychological intervention. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2015; 21:272-85. [PMID: 26042657 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1051063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Patients' expectations have shown to be a major psychological predictor of health outcome in cardiac surgery patients. However, it is unclear whether patients' expectations can be optimized prior to surgery. This study evaluates the development of a brief psychological intervention focusing on the optimization of expectations and its effect on change in patients' expectations prior to cardiac surgery. Ninety patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft were randomly assigned to (1) standard medical care, (2) additional expectation manipulation intervention (EMI), and (3) additional attention control group. Therapists' fidelity to intervention manuals and patients satisfaction with the intervention were assessed for both active intervention conditions. Patients' expectations about post-surgical disability, treatment control, personal control, and disease duration were assessed before and after the psychological intervention. Demographical, medical, and psychosocial characteristics and disability were assessed at baseline. Treatment fidelity and patient satisfaction was very high in both intervention conditions. Only patients receiving EMI developed higher personal control expectations and longer (more realistic) expectations of disease duration. The effect of intervention group on patients' disability expectations and patients' personal control expectations was moderated by patient's level of disability. EMI patients with low to moderate disability developed positive expectations whereas patients with high disability did not. This study shows the successful development of a short psychological intervention that was able to modify patients' expectations, especially in those with low to moderate disability. Given the robust association of expectations and surgery outcome, such an intervention might offer the opportunity to enhance patients' health following cardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes A C Laferton
- a Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , Philipps University of Marburg , Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032 Marburg , Germany
| | - Charlotte J Auer
- a Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , Philipps University of Marburg , Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032 Marburg , Germany
| | - Meike C Shedden-Mora
- b Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy , University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Rainer Moosdorf
- c Department of Cardiovascular Surgery , Heart Centre, Philipps University of Marburg , Marburg , Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- a Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , Philipps University of Marburg , Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032 Marburg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|