Characteristics Analyses and Comparisons of the Protein Structure Networks Constructed by Different Methods

gRINN: a tool for calculation of residue interaction energies and protein energy network analysis of molecular dynamics simulations

Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations generate a wealth of information related to the dynamics of proteins. If properly analyzed, this information can lead to new insights regarding protein function and assist wet-lab experiments. Aiming to identify interactions between individual amino acid residues and the role played by each in the context of MD simulations, we present a stand-alone software called gRINN (get Residue Interaction eNergies and Networks). gRINN features graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and a command-line interface for generating and analyzing pairwise residue interaction energies and energy correlations from protein MD simulation trajectories. gRINN utilizes the features of NAMD or GROMACS MD simulation packages and automatizes the steps necessary to extract residue-residue interaction energies from user-supplied simulation trajectories, greatly simplifying the analysis for the end-user. A GUI, including an embedded molecular viewer, is provided for visualization of interaction energy time-series, distributions, an interaction energy matrix, interaction energy correlations and a residue correlation matrix. gRINN additionally offers construction and analysis of Protein Energy Networks, providing residue-based metrics such as degrees, betweenness-centralities, closeness centralities as well as shortest path analysis. gRINN is free and open to all users without login requirement at http://grinn.readthedocs.io.

An optimal distance cutoff for contact-based Protein Structure Networks using side-chain centers of mass

Proteins are highly dynamic entities attaining a myriad of different conformations. Protein side chains change their states during dynamics, causing clashes that are propagated at distal sites. A convenient formalism to analyze protein dynamics is based on network theory using Protein Structure Networks (PSNs). Despite their broad applicability, few efforts have been devoted to benchmarking PSN methods and to provide the community with best practices. In many applications, it is convenient to use the centers of mass of the side chains as nodes. It becomes thus critical to evaluate the minimal distance cutoff between the centers of mass which will provide stable network properties. Moreover, when the PSN is derived from a structural ensemble collected by molecular dynamics (MD), the impact of the MD force field has to be evaluated. We selected a dataset of proteins with different fold and size and assessed the two fundamental properties of the PSN, i.e. hubs and connected components. We identified an optimal cutoff of 5 Å that is robust to changes in the force field and the proteins. Our study builds solid foundations for the harmonization and standardization of the PSN approach.

The adaptive nature of protein residue networks

Protein residue networks PRNs are used to describe proteins. These networks are usually based on an average structure for the protein. However, proteins are dynamic entities that are affected by their surroundings. In this work, we study the effect of temperatures above and below the protein dynamical transition temperature(≈200 K), on three important network parameters gleaned from weighted PRNs for the solvated β-lactamase inhibitory protein BLIP: the betweenness centrality B, the closeness centrality C, and the clustering coefficient CC. The B and C values will be extracted for each node from PRNs at six different temperatures: 150 K, 180 K, 200 K, 220 K, 250 K, and 310 K respectively. The average value for the CC for each PRN will also be calculated at each temperature, respectively. We find that at temperatures ≤200 K, the network nodes with the most significant B and C values tend to have lower relative solvent accessibility RSA values, and to fall within the protein secondary structure elements (α helices and β sheets). At temperatures >200 K, the significant nodes in terms of B and C tend to have larger RSA values, and to fall on the connecting loops in the protein. The average CC decreases in value for the PRNs up to 200 K, and then remains basically constant above 200 K. This clearly shows that any conclusions based on static PRNs should be handled with care. The dynamic nature of proteins and its coupling to the surrounding environment should be taken into consideration when using the PRN paradigm. Proteins 2017; 85:917-923. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparative Study of Elastic Network Model and Protein Contact Network for Protein Complexes: The Hemoglobin Case

The overall topology and interfacial interactions play key roles in understanding structural and functional principles of protein complexes. Elastic Network Model (ENM) and Protein Contact Network (PCN) are two widely used methods for high throughput investigation of structures and interactions within protein complexes. In this work, the comparative analysis of ENM and PCN relative to hemoglobin (Hb) was taken as case study. We examine four types of structural and dynamical paradigms, namely, conformational change between different states of Hbs, modular analysis, allosteric mechanisms studies, and interface characterization of an Hb. The comparative study shows that ENM has an advantage in studying dynamical properties and protein-protein interfaces, while PCN is better for describing protein structures quantitatively both from local and from global levels. We suggest that the integration of ENM and PCN would give a potential but powerful tool in structural systems biology.

Characterization of Protein-Protein Interfaces through a Protein Contact Network Approach

Anthrax toxin comprises three different proteins, jointly acting to exert toxic activity: a non-toxic protective agent (PA), toxic edema factor (EF), and lethal factor (LF). Binding of PA to anthrax receptors promotes oligomerization of PA, binding of EF and LF, and then endocytosis of the complex. Homomeric forms of PA, complexes of PA bound to LF and to the endogenous receptor capillary morphogenesis gene 2 (CMG2) were analyzed. In this work, we characterized protein–protein interfaces (PPIs) and identified key residues at PPIs of complexes, by means of a protein contact network (PCN) approach. Flexibility and global and local topological properties of each PCN were computed. The vulnerability of each PCN was calculated using different node removal strategies, with reference to specific PCN topological descriptors, such as participation coefficient, contact order, and degree. The participation coefficient P, the topological descriptor of the node’s ability to intervene in protein inter-module communication, was the key descriptor of PCN vulnerability of all structures. High P residues were localized both at PPIs and other regions of complexes, so that we argued an allosteric mechanism in protein–protein interactions. The identification of residues, with key role in the stability of PPIs, has a huge potential in the development of new drugs, which would be designed to target not only PPIs but also residues localized in allosteric regions of supramolecular complexes.