1
|
Yusuf H, Hillman A, Stegeman JA, Cameron A, Badger S. Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship. Front Vet Sci 2024; 11:1349188. [PMID: 38895711 PMCID: PMC11184142 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1349188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Digital clinical decision support (CDS) tools are of growing importance in supporting healthcare professionals in understanding complex clinical problems and arriving at decisions that improve patient outcomes. CDS tools are also increasingly used to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices in healthcare settings. However, far fewer CDS tools are available in lowerand middle-income countries (LMICs) and in animal health settings, where their use in improving diagnostic and treatment decision-making is likely to have the greatest impact. The aim of this study was to evaluate digital CDS tools designed as a direct aid to support diagnosis and/or treatment decisionmaking, by reviewing their scope, functions, methodologies, and quality. Recommendations for the development of veterinary CDS tools in LMICs are then provided. Methods The review considered studies and reports published between January 2017 and October 2023 in the English language in peer-reviewed and gray literature. Results A total of 41 studies and reports detailing CDS tools were included in the final review, with 35 CDS tools designed for human healthcare settings and six tools for animal healthcare settings. Of the tools reviewed, the majority were deployed in high-income countries (80.5%). Support for AMS programs was a feature in 12 (29.3%) of the tools, with 10 tools in human healthcare settings. The capabilities of the CDS tools varied when reviewed against the GUIDES checklist. Discussion We recommend a methodological approach for the development of veterinary CDS tools in LMICs predicated on securing sufficient and sustainable funding. Employing a multidisciplinary development team is an important first step. Developing standalone CDS tools using Bayesian algorithms based on local expert knowledge will provide users with rapid and reliable access to quality guidance on diagnoses and treatments. Such tools are likely to contribute to improved disease management on farms and reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use, thus supporting AMS practices in areas of high need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jan Arend Stegeman
- Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elhaddad M, Hamam S. AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: An Ongoing Pursuit of Potential. Cureus 2024; 16:e57728. [PMID: 38711724 PMCID: PMC11073764 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are essential tools in contemporary healthcare, enhancing clinicians' decisions and patient outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) is now revolutionizing CDSS even further. This review delves into AI technologies transforming CDSS, their applications in healthcare decision-making, associated challenges, and the potential trajectory toward fully realizing AI-CDSS's potential. The review begins by laying the groundwork with a definition of CDSS and its function within the healthcare field. It then highlights the increasingly significant role that AI is playing in enhancing CDSS effectiveness and efficiency, underlining its evolving prominence in shaping healthcare practices. It examines the integration of AI technologies into CDSS, including machine learning algorithms like neural networks and decision trees, natural language processing, and deep learning. It also addresses the challenges associated with AI integration, such as interpretability and bias. We then shift to AI applications within CDSS, with real-life examples of AI-driven diagnostics, personalized treatment recommendations, risk prediction, early intervention, and AI-assisted clinical documentation. The review emphasizes user-centered design in AI-CDSS integration, addressing usability, trust, workflow, and ethical and legal considerations. It acknowledges prevailing obstacles and suggests strategies for successful AI-CDSS adoption, highlighting the need for workflow alignment and interdisciplinary collaboration. The review concludes by summarizing key findings, underscoring AI's transformative potential in CDSS, and advocating for continued research and innovation. It emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts to realize a future where AI-powered CDSS optimizes healthcare delivery and improves patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malek Elhaddad
- Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, CAN
- Medicine, Upper Canada College, Toronto, CAN
| | - Sara Hamam
- Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wenk J, Voigt I, Inojosa H, Schlieter H, Ziemssen T. Building digital patient pathways for the management and treatment of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1356436. [PMID: 38433832 PMCID: PMC10906094 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1356436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) could yield new insights into the potential causes of multiple sclerosis (MS) and factors influencing its course as the use of AI opens new possibilities regarding the interpretation and use of big data from not only a cross-sectional, but also a longitudinal perspective. For each patient with MS, there is a vast amount of multimodal data being accumulated over time. But for the application of AI and related technologies, these data need to be available in a machine-readable format and need to be collected in a standardized and structured manner. Through the use of mobile electronic devices and the internet it has also become possible to provide healthcare services from remote and collect information on a patient's state of health outside of regular check-ups on site. Against this background, we argue that the concept of pathways in healthcare now could be applied to structure the collection of information across multiple devices and stakeholders in the virtual sphere, enabling us to exploit the full potential of AI technology by e.g., building digital twins. By going digital and using pathways, we can virtually link patients and their caregivers. Stakeholders then could rely on digital pathways for evidence-based guidance in the sequence of procedures and selection of therapy options based on advanced analytics supported by AI as well as for communication and education purposes. As far as we aware of, however, pathway modelling with respect to MS management and treatment has not been thoroughly investigated yet and still needs to be discussed. In this paper, we thus present our ideas for a modular-integrative framework for the development of digital patient pathways for MS treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Wenk
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Isabel Voigt
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hernan Inojosa
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hannes Schlieter
- Research Group Digital Health, Faculty of Business and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geldsetzer P, Flores S, Flores B, Rogers AB, Chang AY. Healthcare provider-targeted mobile applications to diagnose, screen, or monitor communicable diseases of public health importance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2023; 2:e0000156. [PMID: 37801442 PMCID: PMC10558072 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
Communicable diseases remain a leading cause of death and disability in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). mHealth technologies carry considerable promise for managing these disorders within resource-poor settings, but many existing applications exclusively represent digital versions of existing guidelines or clinical calculators, communication facilitators, or patient self-management tools. We thus systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for studies published between January 2007 and October 2019 involving technologies that were mobile phone- or tablet-based; able to screen for, diagnose, or monitor a communicable disease of importance in LMICs; and targeted health professionals as primary users. We excluded technologies that digitized existing paper-based tools or facilitated communication (i.e., knowledge-based algorithms). Extracted data included disease category, pathogen type, diagnostic method, intervention purpose, study/target population, sample size, study methodology, development stage, accessory requirement, country of development, operating system, and cost. Given the search timeline, studies involving COVID-19 were not included in the analysis. Of 13,262 studies identified by the screen, 33 met inclusion criteria. 12% were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with 58% of publications representing technical descriptions. 62% of studies had 100 or fewer subjects. All studied technologies involved diagnosis or screening steps; none addressed the monitoring of infections. 52% focused on priority diseases (HIV, malaria, tuberculosis), but only 12% addressed a neglected tropical disease. Although most reported studies were priced under 20USD at time of publication, two thirds of the records did not yet specify a cost for the study technology. We conclude that there are only a small number of mHealth technologies focusing on innovative methods of screening and diagnosing communicable diseases potentially of use in LMICs. Rigorous RCTs, analyses with large sample size, and technologies assisting in the monitoring of diseases are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Geldsetzer
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University; Stanford, California; United States of America
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub; San Francisco, California; United States of America
- Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University; Stanford, California; United States of America
| | - Sergio Flores
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University; Sweden
| | | | - Abu Bakarr Rogers
- Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, California; United States of America
| | - Andrew Y. Chang
- Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University; Stanford, California; United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University; Stanford, California; United States of America
- Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, California; United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beynon F, Guérin F, Lampariello R, Schmitz T, Tan R, Ratanaprayul N, Tamrat T, Pellé KG, Catho G, Keitel K, Masanja I, Rambaud-Althaus C. Digitalizing Clinical Guidelines: Experiences in the Development of Clinical Decision Support Algorithms for Management of Childhood Illness in Resource-Constrained Settings. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2023; 11:e2200439. [PMID: 37640492 PMCID: PMC10461705 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can strengthen the quality of integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) in resource-constrained settings. Several IMCI-related CDSSs have been developed and implemented in recent years. Yet, despite having a shared starting point, the IMCI-related CDSSs are markedly varied due to the need for interpretation when translating narrative guidelines into decision logic combined with considerations of context and design choices. Between October 2019 and April 2021, we conducted a comparative analysis of 4 IMCI-related CDSSs. The extent of adaptations to IMCI varied, but common themes emerged. Scope was extended to cover a broader range of conditions. Content was added or modified to enhance precision, align with new evidence, and support rational resource use. Structure was modified to increase efficiency, improve usability, and prioritize care for severely ill children. The multistakeholder development processes involved syntheses of recommendations from existing guidelines and literature; creation and validation of clinical algorithms; and iterative development, implementation, and evaluation. The common themes surrounding adaptations of IMCI guidance highlight the complexities of digitalizing evidence-based recommendations and reinforce the rationale for leveraging standards for CDSS development, such as the World Health Organization's SMART Guidelines. Implementation through multistakeholder dialogue is critical to ensure CDSSs can effectively and equitably improve quality of care for children in resource-constrained settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenella Beynon
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Torsten Schmitz
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rainer Tan
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Digital and Global Health Unit, Unisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Natschja Ratanaprayul
- Department of Digital Health and Innovations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tigest Tamrat
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Gaud Catho
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Keitel
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mlakar I, Smrke U, Flis V, Bergauer A, Kobilica N, Kampič T, Horvat S, Vidovič D, Musil B, Plohl N. A randomized controlled trial for evaluating the impact of integrating a computerized clinical decision support system and a socially assistive humanoid robot into grand rounds during pre/post-operative care. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221129068. [PMID: 36185391 PMCID: PMC9515524 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221129068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly emphasized as
one of the possible levers for improving care, they are still not widely used
due to different barriers, such as doubts about systems’ performance, their
complexity and poor design, practitioners’ lack of time to use them, poor
computer skills, reluctance to use them in front of patients, and deficient
integration into existing workflows. While several studies on CDSS exist, there
is a need for additional high-quality studies using large samples and examining
the differences between outcomes following a decision based on CDSS support and
those following decisions without this kind of information. Even less is known
about the effectiveness of a CDSS that is delivered during a grand round routine
and with the help of socially assistive humanoid robots (SAHRs). In this study,
200 patients will be randomized into a Control Group (i.e. standard care) and an
Intervention Group (i.e. standard care and novel CDSS delivered via a SAHR).
Health care quality and Quality of Life measures will be compared between the
two groups. Additionally, approximately 22 clinicians, who are also active
researchers at the University Clinical Center Maribor, will evaluate the
acceptability and clinical usability of the system. The results of the proposed
study will provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of CDSS systems
and SAHR in the grand round routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izidor Mlakar
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Urška Smrke
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Vojko Flis
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Nina Kobilica
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Tadej Kampič
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Samo Horvat
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Bojan Musil
- Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Nejc Plohl
- Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|