Ensemble-Based Risk Scoring with Extreme Learning Machine for Prediction of Adverse Cardiac Events

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review

Our scoping review provides a comprehensive analysis of the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in prehospital emergency care (PEC). It contributes to the field by highlighting the most studied AI applications and identifying the most common methodological approaches across 106 included studies. The findings indicate a promising future for AI in PEC, with many unique use cases, such as prognostication, demand prediction, resource optimization, and the Internet of Things continuous monitoring systems. Comparisons with other approaches showed AI outperforming clinicians and non-AI algorithms in most cases. However, most studies were internally validated and retrospective, highlighting the need for rigorous prospective validation of AI applications before implementation in clinical settings. We identified knowledge and methodological gaps using an evidence map, offering a roadmap for future investigators. We also discussed the significance of explainable AI for establishing trust in AI systems among clinicians and facilitating real-world validation of AI models.

Cardiovascular disease incidence prediction by machine learning and statistical techniques: a 16-year cohort study from eastern Mediterranean region

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the predominant cause of early death worldwide. Identification of people with a high risk of being affected by CVD is consequential in CVD prevention. This study adopts Machine Learning (ML) and statistical techniques to develop classification models for predicting the future occurrence of CVD events in a large sample of Iranians.

METHODS

We used multiple prediction models and ML techniques with different abilities to analyze the large dataset of 5432 healthy people at the beginning of entrance into the Isfahan Cohort Study (ICS) (1990-2017). Bayesian additive regression trees enhanced with "missingness incorporated in attributes" (BARTm) was run on the dataset with 515 variables (336 variables without and the remaining with up to 90% missing values). In the other used classification algorithms, variables with more than 10% missing values were excluded, and MissForest imputes the missing values of the remaining 49 variables. We used Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) to select the most contributing variables. Random oversampling technique, recommended cut-point by precision-recall curve, and relevant evaluation metrics were used for handling unbalancing in the binary response variable.

RESULTS

This study revealed that age, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood sugar, two-hour postprandial glucose, diabetes mellitus, history of heart disease, history of high blood pressure, and history of diabetes are the most contributing factors for predicting CVD incidence in the future. The main differences between the results of classification algorithms are due to the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) algorithm presents the highest accuracy (75.50 ± 0.08) but the minimum sensitivity (49.84 ± 0.25); In contrast, decision trees provide the lowest accuracy (51.95 ± 0.69) but the top sensitivity (82.52 ± 1.22). BARTm.90% resulted in 69.48 ± 0.28 accuracy and 54.00 ± 1.66 sensitivity without any preprocessing step.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that building a prediction model for CVD in each region is valuable for screening and primary prevention strategies in that specific region. Also, results showed that using conventional statistical models alongside ML algorithms makes it possible to take advantage of both techniques. Generally, QDA can accurately predict the future occurrence of CVD events with a fast (inference speed) and stable (confidence values) procedure. The combined ML and statistical algorithm of BARTm provide a flexible approach without any need for technical knowledge about assumptions and preprocessing steps of the prediction procedure.

Applications of machine learning to undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chest pain is amongst the most common reason for presentation to the emergency department (ED). There are many causes of chest pain, and it is important for the emergency physician to quickly and accurately diagnose life threatening causes such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Multiple clinical decision tools have been developed to assist clinicians in risk stratifying patients with chest. There is growing recognition that machine learning (ML) will have a significant impact on the practice of medicine in the near future and may assist with diagnosis and risk stratification. This systematic review aims to evaluate how ML has been applied to adults presenting to the ED with undifferentiated chest pain and assess if ML models show improved performance when compared to physicians or current risk stratification techniques.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a systematic review of journal articles that applied a ML technique to an adult patient presenting to an emergency department with undifferentiated chest pain. Multiple databases were searched from inception through to November 2020. In total, 3361 articles were screened, and 23 articles were included. We did not conduct a metanalysis due to a high level of heterogeneity between studies in both their methods, and reporting. The most common primary outcomes assessed were diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (12 studies), and prognosis of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (6 studies). There were 14 retrospective studies and 5 prospective studies. Four studies reported the development of a machine learning model retrospectively then tested it prospectively. The most common machine learning methods used were artificial neural networks (14 studies), random forest (6 studies), support vector machine (5 studies), and gradient boosting (2 studies). Multiple studies achieved high accuracy in both the diagnosis of AMI in the ED setting, and in predicting mortality and composite outcomes over various timeframes. ML outperformed existing risk stratification scores in all cases, and physicians in three out of four cases. The majority of studies were single centre, retrospective, and without prospective or external validation. There were only 3 studies that were considered low risk of bias and had low applicability concerns. Two studies reported integrating the ML model into clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Research on applications of ML for undifferentiated chest pain in the ED has been ongoing for decades. ML has been reported to outperform emergency physicians and current risk stratification tools to diagnose AMI and predict MACE but has rarely been integrated into practice. Many studies assessing the use of ML in undifferentiated chest pain in the ED have a high risk of bias. It is important that future studies make use of recently developed standardised ML reporting guidelines, register their protocols, and share their datasets and code. Future work is required to assess the impact of ML model implementation on clinical decision making, patient orientated outcomes, and patient and physician acceptability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42020184977.

A review of risk prediction models in cardiovascular disease: conventional approach vs. artificial intelligent approach

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and is a global health issue. Traditionally, statistical models are used commonly in the risk prediction and assessment of CVD. However, the adoption of artificial intelligent (AI) approach is rapidly taking hold in the current era of technology to evaluate patient risks and predict the outcome of CVD. In this review, we outline various conventional risk scores and prediction models and do a comparison with the AI approach. The strengths and limitations of both conventional and AI approaches are discussed. Besides that, biomarker discovery related to CVD are also elucidated as the biomarkers can be used in the risk stratification as well as early detection of the disease. Moreover, problems and challenges involved in current CVD studies are explored. Lastly, future prospects of CVD risk prediction and assessment in the multi-modality of big data integrative approaches are proposed.

Understanding Violin Players’ Skill Level Based on Motion Capture: a Data-Driven Perspective

Learning to play and perform a music instrument is a complex cognitive task, requiring high conscious control and coordination of an impressive number of cognitive and sensorimotor skills. For professional violinists, there exists a physical connection with the instrument allowing the player to continuously manage the sound through sophisticated bowing techniques and fine hand movements. Hence, it is not surprising that great importance in violin training is given to right hand techniques, responsible for most of the sound produced. In this paper, our aim is to understand which motion features can be used to efficiently and effectively distinguish a professional performance from that of a student without exploiting sound-based features. We collected and made freely available a dataset consisting of motion capture recordings of different violinists with different skills performing different exercises covering different pedagogical and technical aspects. We then engineered peculiar features and trained a data-driven classifier to distinguish among two different levels of violinist experience, namely beginners and experts. In accordance with the hierarchy present in the dataset, we study two different scenarios: extrapolation with respect to different exercises and violinists. Furthermore, we study which features are the most predictive ones of the quality of a violinist to corroborate the significance of the results. The results, both in terms of accuracy and insight on the cognitive problem, support the proposal and support the use of the proposed technique as a support tool for students to monitor and enhance their home study and practice.

Heart rate n-variability (HRnV) and its application to risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department

Background

Chest pain is one of the most common complaints among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Causes of chest pain can be benign or life threatening, making accurate risk stratification a critical issue in the ED. In addition to the use of established clinical scores, prior studies have attempted to create predictive models with heart rate variability (HRV). In this study, we proposed heart rate n-variability (HRnV), an alternative representation of beat-to-beat variation in electrocardiogram (ECG), and investigated its association with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ED patients with chest pain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from the ED of a tertiary hospital in Singapore between September 2010 and July 2015. Patients > 20 years old who presented to the ED with chief complaint of chest pain were conveniently recruited. Five to six-minute single-lead ECGs, demographics, medical history, troponin, and other required variables were collected. We developed the HRnV-Calc software to calculate HRnV parameters. The primary outcome was 30-day MACE, which included all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between individual risk factors and the outcome. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the HRnV model (based on leave-one-out cross-validation) against other clinical scores in predicting 30-day MACE.

Results

A total of 795 patients were included in the analysis, of which 247 (31%) had MACE within 30 days. The MACE group was older, with a higher proportion being male patients. Twenty-one conventional HRV and 115 HRnV parameters were calculated. In univariable analysis, eleven HRV and 48 HRnV parameters were significantly associated with 30-day MACE. The multivariable stepwise logistic regression identified 16 predictors that were strongly associated with MACE outcome; these predictors consisted of one HRV, seven HRnV parameters, troponin, ST segment changes, and several other factors. The HRnV model outperformed several clinical scores in the ROC analysis.

Conclusions

The novel HRnV representation demonstrated its value of augmenting HRV and traditional risk factors in designing a robust risk stratification tool for patients with chest pain in the ED.