Predicting Seminal Quality via Imbalanced Learning with Evolutionary Safe-Level Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique

Biomarker profiling and integrating heterogeneous models for enhanced multi-grade breast cancer prognostication

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of female mortality worldwide, exacerbated by limited awareness, inadequate screening resources, and treatment options. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for improving survival rates and effective treatment.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to develop an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) based model for predicting breast cancer and its various histopathological grades by integrating multiple biomarkers and subject age, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and prognostication.

METHODS

A novel ensemble-based machine learning (ML) framework has been introduced that integrates three distinct biomarkers-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-alongside subject age. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, and minority oversampling techniques were employed to mitigate overfitting. The model's performance was validated through rigorous five-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

The proposed model demonstrated superior performance, achieving a 97.93% accuracy and a 98.06% F1-score on meticulously labeled test data across diverse age groups. Comparative analysis showed that the model outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, highlighting its robustness and generalizability.

CONCLUSION

By providing a comprehensive analysis of multiple biomarkers and effectively predicting tumor grades, this study offers a significant advancement in breast cancer screening, particularly in regions with limited medical resources. The proposed framework has the potential to reduce breast cancer mortality rates and improve early intervention and personalized treatment strategies.

AI Tools for Assessing Human Fertility Using Risk Factors: A State-of-the-Art Review

Infertility has massively disrupted social and marital life, resulting in stressful emotional well-being. Early diagnosis is the utmost need for faster adaption to respond to these changes, which makes possible via AI tools. Our main objective is to comprehend the role of AI in fertility detection since we have primarily worked to find biomarkers and related risk factors associated with infertility. This paper aims to vividly analyse the role of AI as an effective method in screening, predicting for infertility and related risk factors. Three scientific repositories: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, are used to gather relevant articles via technical terms: (human infertility OR human fertility) AND risk factors AND (machine learning OR artificial intelligence OR intelligent system). In this way, we systematically reviewed 42 articles and performed a meta-analysis. The significant findings and recommendations are discussed. These include the rising importance of data augmentation, feature extraction, explainability, and the need to revisit the meaning of an effective system for fertility analysis. Additionally, the paper outlines various mitigation actions that can be employed to tackle infertility and its related risk factors. These insights contribute to a better understanding of the role of AI in fertility analysis and the potential for improving reproductive health outcomes.

Unboxing Industry-Standard AI Models for Male Fertility Prediction with SHAP

Infertility is a social stigma for individuals, and male factors cause approximately 30% of infertility. Despite this, male infertility is underrecognized and underrepresented as a disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), changes in lifestyle and environmental factors are the prime reasons for the declining rate of male fertility. Artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models have become an effective solution for early fertility detection. Seven industry-standard ML models are used: support vector machine, random forest (RF), decision tree, logistic regression, naïve bayes, adaboost, and multi-layer perception to detect male fertility. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are vital tools that examine the feature's impact on each model's decision making. On these, we perform a comprehensive comparative study to identify good and poor classification models. While dealing with the all-above-mentioned models, the RF model achieves an optimal accuracy and area under curve (AUC) of 90.47% and 99.98%, respectively, by considering five-fold cross-validation (CV) with the balanced dataset. Furthermore, we provide the SHAP explanations of existing models that attain good and poor performance. The findings of this study show that decision making (based on ML models) with SHAP provides thorough explanations for detecting male fertility, as well as a reference for clinicians for further treatment planning.

Imbalanced data preprocessing techniques for machine learning: a systematic mapping study

Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly replacing people in several application domains-in which the majority suffer from data imbalance. In order to solve this problem, published studies implement data preprocessing techniques, cost-sensitive and ensemble learning. These solutions reduce the naturally occurring bias towards the majority sample through ML. This study uses a systematic mapping methodology to assess 9927 papers related to sampling techniques for ML in imbalanced data applications from 7 digital libraries. A filtering process selected 35 representative papers from various domains, such as health, finance, and engineering. As a result of a thorough quantitative analysis of these papers, this study proposes two taxonomies-illustrating sampling techniques and ML models. The results indicate that oversampling and classical ML are the most common preprocessing techniques and models, respectively. However, solutions with neural networks and ensemble ML models have the best performance-with potentially better results through hybrid sampling techniques. Finally, none of the 35 works apply simulation-based synthetic oversampling, indicating a path for future preprocessing solutions.