Improvement of left ventricular function after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a comprehensive echocardiographic assessment using two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis

Catheter ablation versus medical therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare catheter ablation and medical therapy (antiarrhythmics for rhythm or rate control) in patients with AF and HFpEF.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Outcomes were the composite end points of death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, all-cause rehospitalization, and HF hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software, version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

RESULTS

We included 20,257 patients from 8 studies. Of those, 3 were derived from RCTs, either through post hoc analysis or subgroup analysis, and 5 were observational studies. The median follow-up ranged from 24.6 to 61.2 months. Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.83; P = .001; I2 = 66%), all-cause death (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.46-0.99; P = .047; I2 = 61%), cardiovascular death (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21-0.84; P = .014; I2 = 22%), and HF hospitalization (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23-0.82; P = .011; I2 = 87%).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, and all-cause rehospitalization in comparison to medical therapy in patients with AF and HFpEF.

Ablation for atrial fibrillation improves the outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have worse clinical outcomes than those with sinus rhythm (SR). We aim to investigate whether maintaining SR in patients with HFpEF through a strategy such as AF ablation would improve outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a cohort study that analysed 1034 patients (median age 69 [63-76] years, 46.2% [478/1034] female) with HFpEF and AF. Of these, 392 patients who underwent first-time AF ablation were assigned to the ablation group, and the remaining 642 patients, who received only medical therapy, were assigned to the no ablation group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or rehospitalization for worsening heart failure. After a median follow-up of 39 months, the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the ablation group compared to the no ablation group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.37-0.82], P = 0.003) in the propensity score-matched model. Secondary endpoint analysis showed that the benefit of AF ablation was mainly driven by a reduction in rehospitalization for worsening heart failure (adjusted HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34-0.80], P = 0.003). Patients in the ablation group showed a 33% relative decrease in atrial tachycardia/AF recurrence compared to the no ablation group (adjusted HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54-0.84], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with HFpEF and AF, the strategy of AF ablation to maintain SR was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of all-cause death or rehospitalization for worsening heart failure.

The prevalence and characteristics of candidates for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion using a WATCHMAN device among patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using a WATCHMAN device could be a treatment option for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with thromboembolic and bleeding risk. We sought to determine the prevalence and characteristics of patients with AF ablation who are potential candidates for WATCHMAN implantation in a Japanese population.

METHODS

We enrolled 2443 consecutive patients who had previously undergone AF ablation and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We assessed their clinical characteristics and measured their LAA orifice diameter and depth retrospectively using the obtained TEE images. We defined patients who met both anatomical criteria (LAA orifice max diameter: 17-31 mm and LAA max depth > LAA orifice max diameter) and clinical criteria (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 2 and HAS-BLED score ≥ 3) as LAAO candidates.

RESULTS

Among the 2443 enrolled patients, 361 (15%) met the clinical criteria, and 1928 (79%) met the anatomical criteria. Thus 12% (293/2443) of the total patient group met the criteria of LAAO candidates. LAAO candidates showed larger left atrial (LA) volume (77.6 ± 30.1 vs. 67.7 ± 29.1 mL, P < 0.001), larger LAA orifice diameter (22.5 ± 3.2 vs. 22.0 ± 4.3 mm, P = 0.026), and larger LAA depth (28.9 ± 4.6 vs. 27.0 ± 4.8 mm, P < 0.001). LAAO candidates made up only 23% of patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 2 (N = 1295), whereas 78% of patients with a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 (N = 378) were LAAO candidates.

CONCLUSION

Twelve percent of patients who underwent AF ablation were potential candidates for LAAO using a WATCHMAN device in this Japanese population. It is imperative to evaluate bleeding risk when considering the indications for LAAO.

A prospective STudy using invAsive haemodynamic measurements foLLowing catheter ablation for AF and early HFpEF: STALL AF-HFpEF

AIMS

The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the impact of AF ablation on symptoms and exercise haemodynamic parameters of early HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Symptomatic AF patients referred for index AF ablation with ejection fraction ≥50% underwent baseline quality of life questionnaires, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, exercise right heart catheterisation (exRHC), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing. HFpEF was defined by resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg or peak exercise PCWP ≥25 mmHg. Patients with HFpEF were offered AF ablation and follow-up exRHC ≥6 months post-ablation. Of 54 patients undergoing baseline evaluation, 35 (65%) had HFpEF identified by exRHC. HFpEF patients were older (64 ± 10 vs. 54 ± 13 years, P < 0.01), and more frequently female (54% vs. 16%, P < 0.01), hypertensive (63% vs. 16%, P < 0.001), and suffering persistent AF (66% vs. 11%, P < 0.001), compared to those without HFpEF. Twenty HFpEF patients underwent AF ablation and follow-up exRHC 12 ± 6 months post-ablation. Nine (45%) patients no longer fulfilled exRHC criteria for HFpEF at follow-up. Patients remaining arrhythmia free (n = 9, 45%) showed significant improvements in peak exercise PCWP (29 ± 4 to 23 ± 2 mmHg, P < 0.01) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) score (55 ± 30 to 22 ± 30, P < 0.01) while the remainder did not (PCWP 31 ± 5 to 30.0 ± 4 mmHg, P = NS; MLHF score 55 ± 23 to 25 ± 20, P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction frequently coexists in patients with symptomatic AF and preserved ejection fraction. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with comorbid AF and HFpEF improves haemodynamic parameters, BNP and symptoms associated with HFpEF.

Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus with the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: impact of SGLT2 inhibitors

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) for non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. We also tested the hypothesis that sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of development of new-onset AF for non-ischemic DCM patients. We retrospectively studied 210 patients with non-ischemic DCM and sinus rhythm, mean age of 59.0 ± 16.7 years and left ventricular ejection fraction of 31.0 ± 8.2% (all < 45%). T2DM was identified in 60 patients (28.6%), and the remaining 150 patients (71.4%) were classified as non-T2DM patients. New-onset AF occurred in 21 patients (10.0%) over a median follow-up of 6.1 years. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that non-ischemic DCM patients without T2DM experienced fewer occurrences of the development of new-onset AF compared with those with T2DM (log-rank p = 0.0003). Furthermore, global longitudinal strain in patients who showed development of new-onset AF was significantly lower than that in those whose sinus rhythm was preserved (6.4 ± 1.4% vs. 7.7 ± 2.2%, p = 0.01). Of the 60 non-ischemic DCM patients with T2DM, those treated with SGLT2 inhibitors experienced fewer occurrences of the development of new-onset AF than did those not treated with SGLT2 inhibitors (log-rank p = 0.040). T2DM is associated with the development of new-onset AF in non-ischemic DCM patients, and treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors can significantly reduce the development of new-onset AF. Our findings may thus offer a new insight into the management of non-ischemic DCM patients with T2DM.