A review on the Role of Oral Nutritional Supplements in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrient supplements for treating sarcopenia in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prone to malnutrition and sarcopenia as a result of nutritional deficiencies and increased energy metabolism. However, the effects of nutrient supplements (NS) on treating sarcopenia in patients with COPD are not well established from systematic evidence. This meta-analysis examined the effect of NS on sarcopenia in patients with COPD. A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted, and 29 randomized controlled trials involving 1625 participants (age, mean [SD] = 67.9 [7.8] years) were analyzed. NS demonstrated significant improvements in body weight (MD,1.33 kg; 95% CI, 0.60, 2.05 kg; P = 0.0003; I2 = 87%), fat-free mass index (MD, 0.74 kg/m2; 95% CI, 0.21, 1.27 kg/m2; P = 0.007; I2 = 75%), and 6-min walk test (MD, 19.43 m; 95% CI, 4.91, 33.94 m; P = 0.009; I2 = 81%) compared with control. However, NS had nonsignificant effects on handgrip strength (SMD, 0.36; 95% CI, - 0.15, 0.88; P = 0.16; I2 = 87%) and quadriceps muscle strength (SMD, 0.11; 95% CI, -  0.06, 0.27; P = 0.20; I2 = 25%) compared with the control. In conclusion, NS may be an effective treatment for improving body composition and physical performance in COPD. Future studies should explore the effects of intervention durations, specific NS types, or combined training in patients with COPD and sarcopenia.

Management of disease-related malnutrition: a real-world experience with a novel concentrated high-protein energy-dense oral nutritional supplement

OBJECTIVE

Despite the availability of a wide range of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) offerings, individuals with malnutrition are still struggling to meet their nutritional targets. A new concentrated and high-protein energy-dense ONS (≥2.1 kcal/mL;32 g protein/200 mL) with high-quality protein (60% whey protein) has emerged as a pivotal formula to reach the patient's energy-protein requirements, enhance compliance, and maximize stimulation of muscle protein synthesis, key factors driving better nutritional, functional, and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this article is to provide our clinical experience using this new nutritionally concentrated ONS as a therapeutic strategy for patients with DRM.

METHODS

Three clinical cases have been examined using new assessment procedures and a new form of nutritional therapy, and their impact on the nutritional and functional outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe DRM.

RESULTS

A tailored individualized nutritional interventions improved anthropometric, biochemical, and functional outcomes (Case 1,2, and 3) assessed using hand grip strength, bioimpedance and muscle ultrasound, and as well as good gastrointestinal tolerance (Case 1) and compliance to the ONS in patients with DRM (Case 1,2,3).

CONCLUSION

The use of this novel high-protein energy-dense formula with high-quality protein source (≥2.1 kcal/mL; 32 g protein/200 mL; 60% whey protein) overcome common practical challenges in the medical nutrition therapy of patients with DRM, either because these patients require a highly concentrated formulation to meet nutritional requirements due to loss of appetite, lack of interest in food, and high caloric-protein needs due to disease, and a large quantity and quality of protein to optimize muscle recovery due to sarcopenia, common in patients with moderate-severe malnutrition.

Chemosensory function and food perception is affected in COPD, but unrelated to sarcopenia risk

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with advanced COPD often have difficulty maintaining sufficient dietary intake. Chemosensory function influences food choice and intake but is often overlooked in dietary assessment and intervention strategies. This study aimed to assess differences in chemosensory function and hedonic evaluation of food between patients with COPD and age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Additionally, a possible association between increased risk of sarcopenia or frailty and chemosensory impairments was explored.

METHODS

We recruited 53 COPD patients (34 males, mean age 66.6 ± 7.6 years) and 53 controls (25 males, mean age 68.4 ± 5.7 years). Chemosensory function was assessed using a smell threshold, smell identification (Sniffin' Sticks, Burghart) and taste recognition test (Taste Strips, Burghart) and through self-report. Sensory properties (appearance, smell, taste, mouthfeel) of four standardized food products were evaluated on 9-point hedonic rating scales. Sarcopenia risk was assessed with the SARC-F.

RESULTS

The COPD group scored lower on both the smell (p = 0.026 for threshold, p = 0.001 for identification) and taste recognition tests (p < 0.001) and also reported more smell and taste impairments (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Hedonic evaluation of food items' appearance (p = 0.009) and smell (p = 0.033) was lower in COPD patients. Within the COPD group, risk of sarcopenia was not associated with chemosensory function.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that COPD patients have poorer chemosensory function and experience more impairments compared to controls. COPD patients also tend to evaluate foods less positive than do their controls but within COPD patients, sarcopenia risk is not associated with chemosensory function.