Is Ultrafast or Abbreviated Breast MRI Ready for Prime Time?

Contrast-enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging

Imaging research pathways focus increasingly on the development of individualised approaches to breast cancer detection, diagnosis and management. Detection of breast cancer with X-ray mammography may fail in some cancer subtypes with limited changes in morphology/tissue density and in women with dense breasts. International organisations offer recommendations for contrast-enhanced breast imaging, as it provides superior sensitivity for screening, local staging and assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response, when compared with standard X-ray mammography (including tomosynthesis) and breast ultrasound. Arguably, the evidence base is stronger for contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). Unfortunately, patient access to breast MRI in rural and remote areas is limited by practical limitations and equipment licensing restrictions. Moreover, breast MRI is an expensive test, likely to be out of reach for many women. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) offers an attractive alternative to improve patient access to functional breast imaging. It is a new type of digital, dual energy X-ray mammography that can be performed on most modern units, following a relatively inexpensive hard- and software upgrade. In this paper, we review the rapidly accumulating evidence that CEM can provide similar diagnostic accuracy to CE-MRI, though at a significantly lower cost and offering greater comfort to the patient. The adoption of CEM can help meet the anticipated increased demand for CE-MRI.

Impact of non-contrast-enhanced imaging input sequences on the generation of virtual contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans using neural network

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how different combinations of T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) impact the performance of virtual contrast-enhanced (vCE) breast MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The IRB-approved, retrospective study included 1064 multiparametric breast MRI scans (age: 52 ± 12 years) obtained from 2017 to 2020 (single site, two 3-T MRI). Eleven independent neural networks were trained to derive vCE images from varying input combinations of T1w, T2w, and multi-b-value DWI sequences (b-value = 50-1500 s/mm2). Three readers evaluated the vCE images with regard to qualitative scores of diagnostic image quality, image sharpness, satisfaction with contrast/signal-to-noise ratio, and lesion/non-mass enhancement conspicuity. Quantitative metrics (SSIM, PSNR, NRMSE, and median symmetrical accuracy) were analyzed and statistically compared between the input combinations for the full breast volume and both enhancing and non-enhancing target findings.

RESULTS

The independent test set consisted of 187 cases. The quantitative metrics significantly improved in target findings when multi-b-value DWI sequences were included during vCE training (p < 0.05). Non-significant effects (p > 0.05) were observed for the quantitative metrics on the full breast volume when comparing input combinations including T1w. Using T1w and DWI acquisitions during vCE training is necessary to achieve high satisfaction with contrast/SNR and good conspicuity of the enhancing findings. The input combination of T1w, T2w, and DWI sequences with three b-values showed the best qualitative performance.

CONCLUSION

vCE breast MRI performance is significantly influenced by input sequences. Quantitative metrics and visual quality of vCE images significantly benefit when multi b-value DWI is added to morphologic T1w-/T2w sequences as input for model training.

KEY POINTS

Question How do different MRI sequences impact the performance of virtual contrast-enhanced (vCE) breast MRI? Findings The input combination of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences with three b-values showed the best qualitative performance. Clinical relevance While in the future neural networks providing virtual contrast-enhanced images might further improve accessibility to breast MRI, the significant influence of input data needs to be considered during translational research.

Localization of contrast-enhanced breast lesions in ultrafast screening MRI using deep convolutional neural networks

OBJECTIVES

To develop a deep learning-based method for contrast-enhanced breast lesion detection in ultrafast screening MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 837 breast MRI exams of 488 consecutive patients were included. Lesion's location was independently annotated in the maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of the last time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) sequence for each individual breast, resulting in 265 lesions (190 benign, 75 malignant) in 163 breasts (133 women). YOLOv5 models were fine-tuned using training sets containing the same number of MIP images with and without lesions. A long short-term memory (LSTM) network was employed to help reduce false positive predictions. The integrated system was then evaluated on test sets containing enriched uninvolved breasts during cross-validation to mimic the performance in a screening scenario.

RESULTS

In five-fold cross-validation, the YOLOv5x model showed a sensitivity of 0.95, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99, with 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 false positive per breast, respectively. The LSTM network reduced 15.5% of the false positive prediction from the YOLO model, and the positive predictive value was increased from 0.22 to 0.25.

CONCLUSIONS

A fine-tuned YOLOv5x model can detect breast lesions on ultrafast MRI with high sensitivity in a screening population, and the output of the model could be further refined by an LSTM network to reduce the amount of false positive predictions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The proposed integrated system would make the ultrafast MRI screening process more effective by assisting radiologists in prioritizing suspicious examinations and supporting the diagnostic workup.

KEY POINTS

• Deep convolutional neural networks could be utilized to automatically pinpoint breast lesions in screening MRI with high sensitivity. • False positive predictions significantly increased when the detection models were tested on highly unbalanced test sets with more normal scans. • Dynamic enhancement patterns of breast lesions during contrast inflow learned by the long short-term memory networks helped to reduce false positive predictions.

New Approaches and Recommendations for Risk-Adapted Breast Cancer Screening

Population-based breast cancer screening using mammography as the gold standard imaging modality has been in clinical practice for over 40 years. However, the limitations of mammography in terms of sensitivity and high false-positive rates, particularly in high-risk women, challenge the indiscriminate nature of population-based screening. Additionally, in light of expanding research on new breast cancer risk factors, there is a growing consensus that breast cancer screening should move toward a risk-adapted approach. Recent advancements in breast imaging technology, including contrast material-enhanced mammography (CEM), ultrasound (US) (automated-breast US, Doppler, elastography US), and especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (abbreviated, ultrafast, and contrast-agent free), may provide new opportunities for risk-adapted personalized screening strategies. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics techniques has the potential to enhance the performance of risk-adapted screening. This review article summarizes the current evidence and challenges in breast cancer screening and highlights potential future perspectives for various imaging techniques in a risk-adapted breast cancer screening approach. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND

The use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the diagnosis of breast cancer by mammography and/or ultrasound is inconsistent.

METHODS

After conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing preoperative breast MRI versus no MRI, we reconvened to prepare a clinical practice guideline on this topic.

RESULTS

Based on the evidence that MRI improved recurrence, decreased the rates of reoperations (re-excisions or conversion mastectomy), and increased detection of synchronous contralateral breast cancer, we recommend that preoperative breast MRI should be considered on a case-by-case basis in patients diagnosed with breast cancer for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. Based on stronger evidence, preoperative breast MRI is recommended in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. For both recommendations, the decision to proceed with MRI would be conditional on shared decision-making between care providers and the patient, taking into account the benefits and risks of MRI as well as patient preferences. Based on the opinion of the Working Group, preoperative breast MRI is also recommended in the following more specific situations: (a) to aid in surgical planning of breast conserving surgery in patients with suspected or known multicentric or multifocal disease; (b) to identify additional lesions in patients with dense breasts; (c) to determine the presence of pectoralis major muscle/chest wall invasion in patients with posteriorly located tumours or when invasion of the pectoralis major muscle or chest wall is suspected; (d) to aid in surgical planning for skin/nipple-sparing mastectomies, autologous reconstruction, oncoplastic surgery, and breast conserving surgery with suspected nipple/areolar involvement; and (e) in patients with familial/hereditary breast cancer but who have not had recent breast MRI as part of screening or diagnosis.

The effectiveness of an ultrafast breast MRI protocol in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of an ultrafast breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions were recruited between July 2020 to May 2021. A standard breast MRI was performed with the inclusion of the ultrafast protocol between the unenhanced sequence and the first contrast-enhanced sequence. Three radiologists performed image interpretation in consensus. Ultrafast kinetic parameters analysed included the maximum slope (MS), time to enhancement (TTE), and arteriovenous index (AVI). These parameters were compared using receiver operating characteristics with p-values of <0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Eighty-three histopathological proven lesions from 54 patients (mean age 53.87 years, SD 12.34, range 26-78 years) were analysed. Forty-one per cent (n=34) were benign and 59% (n=49) were malignant. All malignant and 38.2% (n=13) benign lesions were visualised on the ultrafast protocol. Of the malignant lesions, 77.6% (n=53) were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 18.4% (n=9) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The MS for malignant lesions (13.27%/s) were significantly larger than for benign (5.45%/s; p<0.0001). No significant differences were seen for TTE and AVI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MS, TTE, and AVI were 0.836, 0.647, and 0.684, respectively. Different types of invasive carcinoma had similar MS and TTE. The MS of high-grade DCIS was also similar to that of IDC. Lower MS values were observed for low-grade (5.3%/s) compared to high-grade DCIS (14.8%/s) but the results were not significant statistically.

CONCLUSION

The ultrafast protocol showed potential to discriminate between malignant and benign breast lesions with high accuracy using MS.

Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrafast DCE (UF-DCE) MRI after the completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in breast cancer. In this study, MR examinations of 55 post-NST breast cancers were retrospectively analyzed. Residual tumor sizes were measured in the 20th phase of UF-DCE MRI, early and delayed phases of conventional DCE MRI, and high spatial-resolution CE MRI (UF, early, delayed, and HR, respectively). The diagnostic performance for the detection of residual invasive cancer was calculated by ROC analysis. The size difference between MRI and pathological findings was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the Bonferroni correction. The overall AUC was highest for UF (0.86 and 0.88 for readers 1 and 2, respectively). The difference in imaging and pathological sizes for UF (5.7 ± 8.2 mm) was significantly smaller than those for early, delayed, and HR (p < 0.01). For luminal subtype breast cancer, the size difference was significantly smaller for UF and early than for delayed (p < 0.01). UF-DCE MRI demonstrated higher AUC and specificity for the more accurate detection of residual cancer and the visualization of tumor extent than conventional DCE MRI.

A Concise Review on the Utilization of Abbreviated Protocol Breast MRI over Full Diagnostic Protocol in Breast Cancer Detection

Breast MRI possesses high sensitivity for detecting breast cancer among the current clinical modalities and is an indispensable imaging practice. Breast MRI comprises diffusion-weighted imaging, ultrafast, and T2 weighted and T1 weighted CE (contrast-enhanced) imaging that may be utilized for improving the characterization of the lesions. This multimodal evaluation of breast lesions enables outstanding discrimination between the malignant and benign and malignant lesions. The expanding indications of breast MRI confirm the far superiority of MRI in preoperative staging, especially in the estimation of tumour size and identifying tumour foci in the contralateral and ipsilateral breast. Recent studies depicted that experts can meritoriously utilize this tool for improving breast cancer surgery despite their existence of no significant long term outcomes. For managing the, directly and indirectly, associated screening cost, abbreviated protocols are found to be more beneficial. Further, in some of the patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast MRI is utilized for documenting response. It is therefore essential to realise that oncological screening must be easily available, cost-effective, and time-consuming. Earlier detection of this short sequence protocol leads to prior and early breast cancer disease in high risky female populations like women with dense breasts, prehistoric evidence, etc. This proper utilization of AP reduces unnecessary mastectomies. Hence, this review focused on the explorative information for strongly suggesting the benefits of AP breast MRI compared to full diagnostic protocol MRI.

Screening Breast MRI Primer: Indications, Current Protocols, and Emerging Techniques

Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer. Screening MRI is currently performed predominantly in patients at high risk for breast cancer, but it could be of benefit in patients at intermediate risk for breast cancer and patients with dense breasts. Decreasing scan time and image interpretation time could increase cost-effectiveness, making screening MRI accessible to a larger group of patients. Abbreviated breast MRI (Ab-MRI) reduces scan time by decreasing the number of sequences obtained, but as multiple delayed contrast enhanced sequences are not obtained, no kinetic information is available. Ultrafast techniques rapidly acquire multiple sequences during the first minute of gadolinium contrast injection and provide information about both lesion morphology and vascular kinetics. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a noncontrast MRI technique with the potential to detect mammographically occult cancers. This review article aims to discuss the current indications of breast MRI as a screening tool, examine the standard breast DCE-MRI technique, and explore alternate screening MRI protocols, including Ab-MRI, ultrafast MRI, and noncontrast diffusion-weighted MRI, which can decrease scan time and interpretation time.

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly used to study breast cancer for screening high-risk cases, pre-operative staging, and problem-solving because of its high sensitivity. However, its cost-effectiveness is still debated. Thus, the concept of abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) protocols was proposed as a possible solution for reducing MRI costs.

PURPOSE

: to investigate the role of the abbreviated MRI protocols in detecting and staging breast cancer.

METHODS

: a systematic search of the literature was carried out in the bibliographic databases: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Science Direct.

RESULTS

: forty-one articles were included, which described results of the assessment of fifty-three abbreviated protocols for screening, staging, recurrence assessing, and problem-solving or clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

: the use of ABB-MRI protocols allows reducing the acquisition and reading times, maintaining a high concordance with the final interpretation, in comparison to a complete protocol. However, larger prospective and multicentre trials are necessary to validate the performance in specific clinical environments.

Routine use of both mammography and MRI surveillance in patients with previous 'mammogram occult' breast cancer: experience from a tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the role of combined MRI and mammogram follow-up in patients with previous 'mammographically occult' breast cancer.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, examinations of all patients undergoing routine surveillance following previous 'mammogram occult' breast cancer were evaluated. Patients had both MRI and mammograms on the same day with an interval of 12-18 months between consecutive pairs. Total number of recalls on both imaging modalities and the outcome of those recalls was recorded. There were six median examinations per patient.

RESULTS

There were a total of 325 examinations of 54 patients. There were 96 mammograms/MRI pairs and 87 lone MRI and 46 lone mammograms. There were a total of 26 recalls in 21 patients. MRI had specificity (95% CI) of 89.99 (85.67 to 93.11) compared to mammograms 96.27 (92.53 to 98.25). The diagnostic OR with 95% CI was 19.40 (3.70 to 101.57) vs 6.72 (1.43 to 31.58) of mammograms and MRI, respectively. Three of seven cancers presented symptomatically.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI surveillance leads to higher recalls and false positives compared to mammograms in this specific subgroup of high-risk patients. Large proportion of cancers presented symptomatically, stressing the importance of remaining vigilant of breast symptoms despite imaging surveillance.

Background parenchymal enhancement and its effect on lesion detectability in ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) often affects interpretation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. There is limited evidence that reduced BPE is a feature of ultrafast DCE (UF-DCE) MRI. We aimed to evaluate the effect of BPE levels on lesion detectability on UF-DCE MRI in comparison with conventional DCE MRI.

METHOD

MRIs of 70 patients with histologically proven breast lesions were retrospectively evaluated. The total number of analyzed lesions was 84 (56 malignant and 28 benign). Using 3 T MRI, 20 phases of UF-DCE MRI based on the three-dimensional gradient-echo VIBE sequence combined with a compressed sensing reconstruction were acquired followed by conventional DCE MRI. Three maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were generated from the 12th phase, the 20th phase of UF-DCE MRI and the initial phase of conventional DCE MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the degree of BPE and lesion detectability of the three MIP images for each breast with histologically confirmed lesions. The degree of BPE was scored on a four-point scale and lesion detectability (conspicuity and confidence levels) was scored on a three-point scale. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

BPE was lower on UF-DCE MRI than on conventional DCE MRI. Lesion detectability was higher on UF-DCE MRI among patients with higher BPE on conventional DCE MRI or premenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

Images with lower BPE can be achieved using UF-DCE MRI and may be advantageous when assessing breast lesions among patients with higher BPE or premenopausal women.

Characterization of Sub-1 cm Breast Lesions Using Radiomics Analysis

BACKGROUND

Small breast lesions are difficult to visually categorize due to the inherent lack of morphological and kinetic detail.

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of radiomics analysis in discriminating small benign and malignant lesions utilizing model free parameter maps.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective, single center.

POPULATION

In all, 149 patients, with a total of 165 lesions scored as BI-RADS 4 or 5 on MRI, with an enhancing volume of <0.52 cm³ .

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Higher spatial resolution T₁ -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with a temporal resolution of ~90 seconds performed at 3.0T.

ASSESSMENT

Parameter maps reflecting initial enhancement, overall enhancement, area under the enhancement curve, and washout were generated. Heterogeneity measures based on first-order statistics, gray level co-occurrence matrices, run length matrices, size zone matrices, and neighborhood gray tone difference matrices were calculated. Data were split into a training dataset (~75% of cases) and a test dataset (~25% of cases).

STATISTICAL TESTS

Comparison of medians was assessed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was utilized to determine significant correlations between individual features. Finally, a support vector machine was employed to build multiparametric predictive models.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions for 58/133 calculated features (P < 0.05). Support vector machine analysis resulted in areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.75-0.81. High negative (>89%) and positive predictive values (>83%) were found for all models.

DATA CONCLUSION

Radiomics analysis of small contrast-enhancing breast lesions is of value. Texture features calculated from later timepoints on the enhancement curve appear to offer limited additional value when compared with features determined from initial enhancement for this patient cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1468-1477.