Electrical impedance to detect accidental nerve puncture during ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks

"Knowing It Before Blocking It," the ABCD of the Peripheral Nerves: Part C (Prevention of Nerve Injuries)

"A clever person solves the problem. A wise person avoids it" (Albert Einstein). There is no convincing evidence that any modality 100% effectively prevents nerve injury. The risk of nerve injury remains the same even with the ultrasound due to limitations in the resolution of images and inter-operator and inter-patient differences. In a nutshell, caution is required when dealing with precious nerves in the perioperative period, either during peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), patient positioning, or surgery. Identifying pre-existing nerve injury, either due to trauma or an existing neuropathy, and preventing further nerve injury should be an important goal in providing safe regional anesthesia (RA). Multimodal monitoring is key to avoiding multifactorial nerve injuries. The use of triple guidance (ultrasound + peripheral nerve stimulator + injection pressure monitor) during PNBs further improves the safety of RA. The ultrasound helps in real-time visualization of the nerve, needle, and drug spread; the peripheral nerve stimulator helps confirm the target nerves; and the injection pressure monitor helps avoid nerve injury. Such multimodalities can also give the confidence to administer PNB without risk of nerve injury. This article is part of the comprehensive overview of the essential understanding of peripheral nerves before blocking them. It describes various preventive measures to avoid peripheral nerve injuries while administering PNBs. It will help readers understand the importance of prevention in each step to avoid perioperative PNIs.

Use of Continuous Electrical Impedance Measurement for Accurate Nerve Block in Rabbits

OBJECTIVE

To perform an effective and safe nerve block, the needle must be placed near the target nerve while avoiding nerve damage. Our objective was to conduct an animal study to determine whether changes in electrical impedance (EI) could be used to guide the needle and achieve a safe and accurate nerve block.

METHODS

We measured the EI of rabbit tissues during ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block using a bipolar needle via the in-plane needle approach. The EI values and needle track on the ultrasound monitor were video-recorded. When there was a change in the EI, the needle advancement was stopped, and a stained anesthetic was injected. Subsequently, the animals were euthanized, and the anesthetic-stained tissue was examined via dissection, while the other tissue was preserved at -80°C for microscopic analysis.

RESULTS

The EI remained stable as the needle advanced through the muscle (extraneural); however, it markedly decreased when the needle tip contacted the nerve or slightly punctured the epineurium (paraneural). The mean extra- and paraneural EIs were 4.92 ± 1.31 kΩ (range, 2.39-9.67 kΩ) and 2.86 ± 0.96 kΩ (range, 1.66-5.13 kΩ), respectively. Examination of the dissections and cryostat sections showed anesthetic delivery around the nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

EI values differed between extra- and paraneural sites, and monitoring these values allowed prediction of the needle tip location with respect to the target nerve. Real-time EI measurement could improve the nerve block.

Novel approaches to needle tracking and visualisation

The accuracy and reliability of ultrasound are still insufficient to guarantee complete and safe nerve block for all patients. Injection of local anaesthetic close to, but not touching, the nerve is key to outcomes, but the exact relationship between the needle tip and nerve epineurium is difficult to evaluate, even with ultrasound. Ultrasound has insufficient resolution, tissues are difficult to discern due to acoustic impedance and needles are more difficult to see with increased angulation. The limitations of ultrasound have shifted the focus of innovation towards bio-markers that help detect needle tip position by utilising the physical properties of tissues, (e.g. pressure, electrical, optics, acoustic and elastic). Although most are at the laboratory stage and results are as yet only available from phantom or cadaver studies, clinical trials are imminent. For example, fine optical fibres placed within the lumen of block needles can measure needle tip pressure. Electrical impedance differentiates between intraneural and perineural needle tip placement. A new tip tracker needle has a piezo element embedded at its distal end that tracks the needle tip in-plane and out-of-plane as a blue/red or green circle depending on its relative location within the beam. Micro-ultrasound at the tip of the needle is in development. Early images using 40MHz in anaesthetised pigs reveal muscle striation, distinct epineurium and 30-40 fascicles > 75 micron in diameter. The next few years will see a technological revolution in tip-tracking technology that has the potential to improve patient safety and, in doing so, change practice.

Cross-sectional area of the median nerve after intraneural vs perineural low volume administration

INTRODUCTION

To recognise the relationship between the needle tip and the median nerve during peripheral nerve block is of interest to avoid neural damage. However, signs of intraneural injection are not clearly established. The aim of this study was to define the changes observed in the peripheral nerve after the intraneural or perineural administration of 1ml of solution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ultrasound guided median nerve blocks were performed in the forearm of 10 fresh cadavers on 60 occasions (3 per forearm). They were randomised into the intraneural (n=30) or perineural (n=30) location of the needle tip, after the consensus of location by 7 specialists. After 1ml of solution was injected an evaluation was made of the changes in the cross-sectional area of the nerve, as well as the displacement along the nerve.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was increased in both groups, however, the increase was significantly higher in the intraneural group (perineural 0.007±0.013cm2 vs. intraneural 0.032±0.021cm2, P<.0001). An increase of more than 27% of the area ensures an intraneural injection in the median nerve according to the ROC curve analysis. Both proximal and distal diffusion were observed more frequently in the intraneural group (proximal: 86% vs 14%, P<.0001, Distal: 43% vs 4%, P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this experimental study, it is concluded that the injection of a small volume (1ml) allows to discriminate the disposition of the intraneural vs perineural needle in a high percentage of cases. Therefore, it is suggested that this "dose test" should be considered in the safety algorithms if it is required to reduce the incidence of intraneural injection.

Electrical Impedance to Assess Facial Nerve Proximity During Robotic Cochlear Implantation

Reported studies pertaining to needle guidance suggest that tissue impedance available from neuromonitoring systems can be used to discriminate nerve tissue proximity. In this pilot study, the existence of a relationship between intraoperative electrical impedance and tissue density, estimated from computer tomography (CT) images, is evaluated in the mastoid bone of in vivo sheep. In five subjects, nine trajectories were drilled using an image-guided surgical robot. Per trajectory, five measurement points near the facial nerve were accessed and electrical impedance was measured (≤1 KHz) using a multipolar electrode probe. Micro-CT was used postoperatively to measure the distances from the drilled trajectories to the facial nerve. Tissue density was determined from coregistered preoperative CT images and, following sensitivity field modeling of the measuring tip, tissue resistivity was calculated. The relationship between impedance and density was determined for 29 trajectories passing or intersecting the facial nerve. A monotonic decrease in impedance magnitude was observed in all trajectories with a drill axis intersecting the facial nerve. Mean tissue densities intersecting with the facial nerve (971-1161 HU) were different (p <0.01) from those along safe trajectories passing the nerve (1194-1449 HU). However, mean resistivity values of trajectories intersecting the facial nerve (14-24 Ωm) were similar to those of safe passing trajectories (17-23 Ωm). The determined relationship between tissue density and electrical impedance during neuromonitoring of the facial nerve suggests that impedance spectroscopy may be used to increase the accuracy of tissue discrimination, and ultimately improve nerve safety distance assessment in the future.

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Intrafascicular Local Anesthetic Injection Damages Peripheral Nerve-Induced Neuropathic Pain

Peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) is advantageous for patients undergoing surgery to decrease the perioperative opioid consumptions and enhance recovery after surgery.Inadvertent local anesthetic (LA) administration into nerve fiber intrafascicularly easily results in unrecognized nerve injury. Using nerve block guidance either by ultrasound, electrical nerve stimulator, or using pressure devices does not prevent nerve damage, even though most of the nerve injury is transiently. The incidence of neurologic symptoms or neuropathy is in the range of 0.02-2.2%, and no significant difference of postoperative neurologic symptoms is found as compared with using ultrasound or guided nerve stimulator technique. However, intrafascicular lidocaine brought about macrophage migration into the damaged fascicle, Schwann cell proliferation, increased intensity of myelin basic protein, and shorten withdrawal time to mechanical stimuli. In dorsal root ganglion (DRG), intrafascicular LA injection increased the activated transcriptional factor 3 (ATF-3) and downregulated Nav1.8 (Nav1.8). In spinal dorsal horn (SDH), the microglia and astrocytes located in SDH were activated and proliferated after intrafascicular LA injection and returned to baseline gradually at the end of the month. This is a kind of neuropathic pain, so low injection pressure should be maintained, the correct needle bevel used, nerve stimulator or ultrasound guidance applied, and careful and deliberately slow injection employed as important parts of the injection technique to prevent intrafascicular LA administration-induced neuropathic pain.

Stimulating effect of thyroid hormones in peripheral nerve regeneration: research history and future direction toward clinical therapy

Injury to peripheral nerves is often observed in the clinic and severe injuries may cause loss of motor and sensory functions. Despite extensive investigation, testing various surgical repair techniques and neurotrophic molecules, at present, a satisfactory method to ensuring successful recovery does not exist. For successful molecular therapy in nerve regeneration, it is essential to improve the intrinsic ability of neurons to survive and to increase the speed of axonal outgrowth. Also to induce Schwann cell phenotypical changes to prepare the local environment favorable for axonal regeneration and myelination. Therefore, any molecule that regulates gene expression of both neurons and Schwann cells could play a crucial role in peripheral nerve regeneration. Clinical and experimental studies have reported that thyroid hormones are essential for the normal development and function of the nervous system, so they could be candidates for nervous system regeneration. This review provides an overview of studies devoted to testing the effect of thyroid hormones on peripheral nerve regeneration. Also it emphasizes the importance of combining biodegradable tubes with local administration of triiodothyronine for future clinical therapy of human severe injured nerves. We highlight that the local and single administration of triiodothyronine within biodegradable nerve guide improves significantly the regeneration of severed peripheral nerves, and accelerates functional recovering. This technique provides a serious step towards future clinical application of triiodothyronine in human severe injured nerves. The possible regulatory mechanism by which triiodothyronine stimulates peripheral nerve regeneration is a rapid action on both axotomized neurons and Schwann cells.

Detection of needle to nerve contact based on electric bioimpedance and machine learning methods

In an ongoing project for electrical impedance-based needle guidance we have previously showed in an animal model that intraneural needle positions can be detected with bioimpedance measurement. To enhance the power of this method we in this study have investigated whether an early detection of the needle only touching the nerve also is feasible. Measurement of complex impedance during needle to nerve contact was compared with needle positions in surrounding tissues in a volunteer study on 32 subjects. Classification analysis using Support-Vector Machines demonstrated that discrimination is possible, but that the sensitivity and specificity for the nerve touch algorithm not is at the same level of performance as for intra-neuralintraneural detection.

The Use of Electrical Impedance to Identify Intraneural Needle Placement in Human Peripheral Nerves: A Study on Amputated Human Limbs

BACKGROUND

Even as the use of peripheral nerve blockade in the perioperative setting is increasing, neural injury secondary to accidental intraneural injection remains a significant patient safety concern. Current modalities, including electrical stimulation and ultrasound imaging, still lack consistency and absolute reliability in both the detection and prevention of this complication. The measurement of electrical impedance (EI) could be an easy and valuable additional tool to detect intraneural needle placement. Our objectives in this study were to measure the change in EI with intraneural needle advancement in recently amputated human limbs.

METHODS

The study was conducted within 45 minutes of amputation. The nerves that were studied were the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa in above-knee amputations or the tibial nerve below the calf in below-knee amputations. The amputated limb was placed on a tray and under ultrasound imaging guidance, an insulated peripheral block needle connected to a nerve stimulator was placed extraneurally and subsequently advanced intraneurally. The experiment was repeated on the same nerve after exposure by surgical dissection. The differences in impedance measurements between intraneural and extraneural needle placement were compared.

RESULTS

In the below-knee amputated extremity (tibial nerve, n = 6) specimens based on the ultrasound methods, mean ± SD for ultrasound-guided intraneural impedance was 10 ± 2 kΩ compared with an extraneural impedance of 6 ± 1.6 kΩ (P = 0.005). The difference between intraneural and extraneural impedance after open dissection was also significant when we repeated the analysis based on the same specimens (P = 0.005). Similarly, in the above-the-knee amputated extremity (sciatic nerve, n = 5) specimens, mean intraneural impedance was 35.2 ± 7.9 kΩ compared with an extraneural impedance of 25.2 ± 5.3 kΩ (P = 0.037). The difference between intraneural and extraneural impedance obtained after open dissection was also significant when we repeated the analysis based on the same specimens (P = 0.0002). The impedance values were consistent and similar to those obtained after open dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable "gold standard" to predict or prevent intraneural needle placement during peripheral nerve blockade. This small sample-sized study demonstrated that there is a change in EI with intraneural needle advancement. In clinical practice, measurement of the EI in conjunction with nerve stimulation may serve as another tool to use for identifying intraneural needle placement during peripheral nerve blockade.

Detection of intraneural needle-placement with multiple frequency bioimpedance monitoring: a novel method

Electrical impedance measurements have been used to detect intraneural needle placement, but there is still a lack of precision with this method. The purpose of the study was to develop a method for the discrimination of nerve tissue from other tissue types based on multiple frequency impedance measurements. Impedance measurements with 25 different frequencies between 1.26 and 398 kHz were obtained in eight pigs while placing the tip of a stimulation needle within the sciatic nerve and in other tissues. Various impedance variables and measurement frequencies were tested for tissue discrimination. Best tissue discrimination was obtained by using three different impedance parameters with optimal measurement frequencies: Modulus (126 kHz), Phase angle (40 kHz) and the Delta of the phase angle (between 126 and 158 kHz). These variables were combined in a Compound variable C. The area under the curve in a receiver operating characteristic was consecutively increased for the Modulus (78 %), Phase angle (86 %), Delta of the phase angle (94 %), and the Compound variable C (97 %), indicating highest specificity and sensitivity for C. An algorithm based on C was implemented in a real-time feasibility test and used in an additional test animal to demonstrate our new method. Discrimination between nerve tissue and other tissue types was improved by combining several impedance variables at multiple measurement frequencies.