1
|
Li Q, Yang Y, Leng Y, Yin X, Liu J, Zhou C. Dexmedetomidine with different concentrations added to local anesthetics in erector spinae plane block: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1326566. [PMID: 38841587 PMCID: PMC11150627 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1326566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Dexmedetomidine has been used as a perineural local anesthetic (LA) adjuvant to facilitate the potency of erector spinal plane block (ESPB). This quantitative review aimed to evaluate whether perineural dexmedetomidine for ESPB can improve the effects of analgesia compared to LA alone. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the addition of dexmedetomidine to LA compared to LA alone in ESPB were included. The pain scores, duration of sensory block, the time to first analgesia requirement, postoperative morphine consumption, rescue analgesia, and dexmedetomidine-related side effects were analyzed and combined using random-effects models. Results A total of 823 patients from 13 RCTs were analyzed. Dexmedetomidine was used at the concentration of 0.5 μg/kg in three trials and 1 μg/kg in nine trials, and both in one trial. Both concentrations of dexmedetomidine perineurally administrated significantly reduced the rest VAS scores postoperatively at 12 h (0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.86; 95% CI: -1.59 to -0.12; p = 0.02; 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.49; 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.16; p = 0.004), and 24 h (0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.43; 95% CI: -0.74 to -0.13; p = 0.005; 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.62; 95% CI: -0.84 to -0.41; p < 0.00001). Both concentrations of dexmedetomidine added in LAs improved the dynamic VAS scores postoperatively at 12 h (0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.55; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15; p = 0.007; 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.66; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.28; p = 0.0006) and 24 h (0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.52; 95% CI: -0.94 to -0.10; p = 0.01; 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine: MD = -0.46; 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.16; p = 0.002). Furthermore, perineural dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of the sensory block and the time to first analgesia requirement, reduced postoperative morphine consumption, and lowered the incidence of rescue analgesia and chronic pain. Conclusion The meta-analysis showed that using perineural dexmedetomidine at either 0.5 μg/kg or 1 μg/kg doses in ESPB can effectively and safely enhance pain relief. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42023424532: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yaoxin Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu Leng
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaowei Yin
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin Liu
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Cheng Zhou
- Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martinez GJ, Lautenschlager KA, Aden JK, Maani CV, Lopez EM, McCallin JP. Effects of Multimodal Analgesia on Recovery From Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:252-259. [PMID: 31851404 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the relationship between number and type of analgesic modalities utilized and postoperative pain after percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implantation. Secondary measures include opioid requirements, discharge times, and effects of specific modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort at Brooke Army Medical Center from April 2008 through July 2017 reviewed 70 patients undergoing stimulator implantation by a pain specialist. Data included: home opioid regimen; preoperative/postoperative medications and pain; intraoperative medications; and discharge times. Analysis utilized a Wilcoxon nonparametric mode, and chi-square testing for specific modalities. We compared outcomes based on the number of modalities administered and whether patients received specific medications. RESULTS Patients averaged receiving 3.8 modalities (standard deviation 1.4). Patients receiving ≥5 modalities had increased pain from preoperative to postoperative scores by two points, while those who received ≤4 had no increase (p < 0.01). Patients receiving ketamine had a median three point increase in pain scores from their baseline vs no change for others (p < 0.05). Patients receiving four modalities had shorter phase one recovery times vs ≤ 2 (median 66 vs 91.5 min; p = 0.01). Patients receiving ≥4 modalities had shorter times vs ≤3 (median 74 vs 88.5 min; p < 0.01). Patients receiving NSAIDs had shorter times than others (median 78 vs 87 min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Ketamine administration and use of ≥5 analgesic modalities were associated with more postoperative pain for unclear reasons. Patients receiving NSAIDs or ≥4 analgesic modalities had shorter recovery times. These data may lead to further work that could optimize ambulatory practices for stimulator implantation. More work is warranted on this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greggory J Martinez
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Karl A Lautenschlager
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA; Department of Pain Management, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - James K Aden
- Research Division, Graduate Medical Education, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher V Maani
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edward M Lopez
- Department of Pain Management, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - John P McCallin
- Department of Pain Management, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bader A. The Value of Preoperative Assessment. Perioper Med (Lond) 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-56724-4.00004-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
4
|
Kaye AD, Chernobylsky DJ, Thakur P, Siddaiah H, Kaye RJ, Eng LK, Harbell MW, Lajaunie J, Cornett EM. Dexmedetomidine in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Postoperative Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2020; 24:21. [PMID: 32240402 PMCID: PMC7223065 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00853-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Effective acute pain management has evolved considerably in recent years and is a primary area of focus in attempts to defend against the opioid epidemic. Persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) has an incidence of up to 30-50% and has negative outcome of quality of life and negative burden on individuals, family, and society. The 2016 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines states that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) forms an integral part of Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) and is now recommended to use a multimodal opioid-sparing approach for management of postoperative pain. As such, dexmedetomidine is now being used as part of ERAS protocols along with regional nerve blocks and other medications, to create a satisfactory postoperative outcome with reduced opioid consumption in the Post anesthesia care unit (PACU). RECENT FINDINGS Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha2 agonist, possesses analgesic effects and has a different mechanism of action when compared with opioids. When dexmedetomidine is initiated at the end of a procedure, it has a better hemodynamic stability and pain response than ropivacaine. Dexmedetomidine can be used as an adjuvant in epidurals with local anesthetic sparing effects. Its use during nerve blocks results in reduced postoperative pain. Also, local infiltration of IV dexmedetomidine is associated with earlier discharge from PACU. Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine has significantly improved postoperative outcomes when used as part of ERAS protocols. An in-depth review of the use of dexmedetomidine in ERAS protocols is presented for clinical anesthesiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan David Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA USA
| | | | - Pankaj Thakur
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Harish Siddaiah
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Rachel J. Kaye
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Lauren K. Eng
- Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
| | - Monica W. Harbell
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Jared Lajaunie
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Room 656, 1542 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
| | - Elyse M. Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Small C, Laycock H. Acute postoperative pain management. Br J Surg 2020; 107:e70-e80. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundAcute postoperative pain is common. Nearly 20 per cent of patients experience severe pain in the first 24 h after surgery, a figure that has remained largely unchanged in the past 30 years. This review aims to present key considerations for postoperative pain management.MethodsA narrative review of postoperative pain strategies was undertaken. Searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Google Scholar databases were performed using the terms postoperative care, psychological factor, pain management, acute pain service, analgesia, acute pain and pain assessment.ResultsInformation on service provision, preoperative planning, pain assessment, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies relevant to acute postoperative pain management in adults is presented, with a focus on enhanced recovery after surgery pathways.ConclusionAdequate perioperative pain management is integral to patient care and outcomes. Each of the biological, psychological and social dimensions of the pain experience should be considered and understood in order to provide optimum pain management in the postoperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Small
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - H Laycock
- Department of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sherwin A, Pollard V, Bolger C, Moore M. Adjuvant analgesics in spinal surgery. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2019; 78:712-715. [PMID: 29240497 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.12.712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Peri- and postoperative pain control can present a challenge to any doctor, particularly in the setting of spinal surgery. The use of adjuvant pain agents and multimodal analgesia is changing the face of modern anaesthesia and offering clinicians more avenues to control perioperative pain. This article discusses the use of adjuvant medications and some of the evidence surrounding their use in spinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aislinn Sherwin
- Specialist Registrar, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Valerie Pollard
- Consultant Anaesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Ciaran Bolger
- Consultant Neurosurgeon, Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Michael Moore
- Consultant Anaesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Severe chronic pain is often devastating for the affected individuals causing substantial suffering, health impairment, and a very low quality of life, including significant negative consequences for the patient and for society. Patients with complex pain disorders are seen often in relation to anaesthesia. They deserve special attention and require long time hospitalization and multiple contacts with health-care providers after discharge from hospital. A wider adoption of best perioperative and intraoperative pain management practice is required. This paper reviews current knowledge of perioperative and intraoperative pain management and anaesthetic care of the chronic pain patient. The individual topics covered include the magnitude of the problem created by chronic pain, the management of the patients taking various types of opioids, tolerance and opioid induced hyperalgesia and the multidisciplinary approach to pain management. The preventive and preemptive strategies for reducing the opioid needs and chronic pain after surgery are reviewed. The last section includes the role of acute pain services and an example of the implementation of a transitional pain service with the various benefits it offers; for example, the decrease of the opioid dose after discharge from the hospital. Patients also receive the continuity of care, with not only pain relief but also improvements in physical functioning, quality of life and emotional stress.
Collapse
|
8
|
Analysis of Multiple Routes of Analgesic Administration in the Immediate Postoperative Period: a 10-Year Experience. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:22. [DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0754-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
9
|
Evolving healthcare delivery paradigms and the optimization of ‘value’ in anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30:223-229. [DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
10
|
Lollo L, Bhananker S, Stogicza A. Postoperative sciatic and femoral or saphenous nerve blockade for lower extremity surgery in anesthetized adults. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2016; 5:232-6. [PMID: 26807391 PMCID: PMC4705568 DOI: 10.4103/2229-5151.170846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Guidelines warn of increased risks of injury when placing regional nerve blocks in the anesthetized adult but complications occurred in patients that received neither sedation nor local anesthetic. This restriction of nerve block administration places vulnerable categories of patients at risk of severe opioid induced side effects. Patient and operative technical factors can preclude use of preoperative regional anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess complications following sciatic popliteal and femoral or saphenous nerve blockade administered to anesthetized adult patients following foot and ankle surgery. Materials and Methods: Postoperative patients administered general anesthesia received popliteal sciatic nerve blockade and either femoral or saphenous nerve blockade if operative procedures included medial incisions. Nerve blocks were placed with nerve stimulator or ultrasound guidance. A continuous nerve catheter was inserted if hospital admission was over 24 hours. Opioid analgesic supplementation was administered for inadequate pain relief. Postoperative pain scores and total analgesic requirements for 24 hours were recorded. Nerve block related complications were monitored for during the hospital admission and at follow up surgical clinic evaluation. Results: 190 anesthetized adult patients were administered 357 nerve blocks. No major nerve injury or deficit was reported. One patient had numbness in the toes not ascribed to a specific nerve of the lower extremity. Perioperative opioid dose differences were noted between male and female and between opioid naïve and tolerant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loreto Lollo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sanjay Bhananker
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Agnes Stogicza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clarke H, Poon M, Weinrib A, Katznelson R, Wentlandt K, Katz J. Preventive analgesia and novel strategies for the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain. Drugs 2016; 75:339-51. [PMID: 25752774 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-015-0365-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a serious complication of major surgery that can impair a patient's quality of life. The development of CPSP is a complex process which involves biologic, psychosocial, and environmental mechanisms that have yet to be fully understood. Currently perioperative pharmacologic interventions aim to suppress and prevent sensitization with the aim of reducing pain and analgesic requirement in acute as well as long-term pain . Despite the detrimental effects of CPSP on patients, the body of literature focused on treatment strategies to reduce CPSP remains limited and continues to be understudied. This article reviews the main pharmacologic candidates for the treatment of CPSP, discusses the future of preventive analgesia, and considers novel strategies to help treat acute post-operative pain and lessen the risk that it becomes chronic. In addition, this article highlights important areas of focus for clinical practice including: multimodal management of CPSP patients, psychological modifiers of the pain experience, and the development of a Transitional Pain Service specifically designed to manage patients at high risk of developing chronic post-surgical pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hance Clarke
- Pain Research Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Eaton North 3 EB 317, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evans SF, Porter JM. Simplified technique for injection of Botulinum Toxin to Obturator Internus muscle using ultrasound-guided nerve stimulation for persistent pelvic pain. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015. [PMID: 26224128 PMCID: PMC5034745 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections have been used to reduce muscle spasm in the presence of severe pelvic pain. However, while pubococcygeus is easily accessed vaginally, injection to obturator internus is more complex – with variation in operative technique and needle placement confounding the ability to assess outcomes. We describe a simplified technique for BoNT injection to obturator internus using neurostimulation under ultrasound guidance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Blum JM, Biel SS, Hilliard PE, Jutkiewicz EM. Preoperative ultra-rapid opiate detoxification for the treatment of post-operative surgical pain. Med Hypotheses 2015; 84:529-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
14
|
Gharapetian A, Chung F, Wong D, Wong J. Perioperative fellowship curricula in anesthesiology: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth 2014; 62:403-12. [DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0299-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 12/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
Chronic pain is a significant complex problem in the perioperative environment. The management of patients with chronic pain has presented new challenges to anesthesia providers in the perioperative setting. The treatment of pain is often inadequate, and patients with preexisting chronic pain are not being managed properly. Although numerous techniques for intraoperative analgesia have been established, no official guidelines have been published for the growing population of patients with chronic pain. This article provides insight into and awareness of the various elements that should be addressed, along with interventions for the patient with chronic pain in the perioperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee N Benfari
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, 20 York Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stundner O, Ortmaier R, Memtsoudis SG. Which outcomes related to regional anesthesia are most important for orthopedic surgery patients? Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 32:809-821. [PMID: 25453663 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2014.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
An increasing body of evidence supports the benefits of regional anesthesia in orthopedic surgery. Compared with systemic anesthetic and analgesic approaches, these benefits include more focused and sustained pain control, less systemic side effects, improved patient comfort, earlier mobilization and hospital discharge, lower rates of advanced service requirements, and lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, there is discussion about the various outcomes as judged by patients and heath care practitioners. This article recapitulates the literature and presents an overview of endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ottokar Stundner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg 5020, Austria
| | - Rainhold Ortmaier
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg 5020, Austria
| | - Stavros G Memtsoudis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|