Point-of-care ultrasonography in Canadian anesthesiology residency programs: a national survey of program directors

Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Nomenclature

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) involves the acquisition, interpretation, and immediate clinical integration of ultrasonographic imaging performed by a treating clinician. The current state of cardiac POCUS terminology is heterogeneous and ambiguous, in part because it evolved through siloed specialty practices. In particular, the medical literature and colloquial medical conversation contain a wide variety of terms that equate to cardiac POCUS. While diverse terminology aided in the development and dissemination of cardiac POCUS throughout multiple specialties, it also contributes to confusion and raises patient safety concerns. This statement is the product of a diverse and inclusive Writing Group from multiple specialties, including medical linguistics, that employed an iterative process to contextualize and standardize a nomenclature for cardiac POCUS. We sought to establish a deliberate vocabulary that is sufficiently unrelated to any specialty, ultrasound equipment, or clinical setting to enhance consistency throughout the academic literature and patient care settings. This statement (1) reviews the evolution of cardiac POCUS-related terms; (2) outlines specific recommendations, distinguishing between intrinsic and practical differences in terminology; (3) addresses the implications of these recommendations for current practice; and (4) discusses the implications for novel technologies and future research.

Competencies for proficiency in basic point-of-care ultrasound in anesthesiology: national expert recommendations using Delphi methodology

PURPOSE

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) allows for rapid bedside assessment and guidance of patient care. Recently, POCUS was included as a mandatory component of Canadian anesthesiology training; however, there is no national consensus regarding the competencies to guide curriculum development. We therefore aimed to define national residency competencies for basic perioperative POCUS proficiency.

METHODS

We adopted a Delphi process to delineate relevant POCUS competencies whereby we circulated an online survey to academic anesthesiologists identified as POCUS leads/experts (n = 25) at all 17 Canadian anesthesiology residency programs. After reviewing a list of competencies derived from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's National Curriculum, we asked participants to accept, refine, delete, or add competencies. Three rounds were completed between 2022 and 2023. We discarded items with < 50% agreement, revised those with 50-79% agreement based upon feedback provided, and maintained unrevised those items with ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

We initially identified and circulated (Round 1) 74 competencies across 19 clinical domains (e.g., basics of ultrasound [equipment, nomenclature, clinical governance, physics]; cardiac [left ventricle, right ventricle, valve assessment, pericardial effusion, intravascular volume status] and lung ultrasound anatomy, image acquisition, and image interpretation; and clinical applications [monitoring and serial assessments, persistent hypotension, respiratory distress, cardiac arrest]). After three Delphi rounds (and 100% response rate maintained), panellists ultimately agreed upon 75 competencies.

CONCLUSION

Through national expert consensus, this study identified POCUS competencies suitable for curriculum development and assessment in perioperative anesthesiology. Next steps include designing and piloting a POCUS curriculum and assessment tool(s) based upon these nationally defined competencies.

Intraoperative FoCUS: Training Practices and Views on Feasibility

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether resident anesthesiologists perceive intraoperative focused cardiac ultrasonography (FoCUS) as feasible, the self-reported confidence of residents performing intraoperative FoCUS, and United States graduate medical education resident ultrasound training practices.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

The United States Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-listed anesthesiology programs over a 3-month period between June 2022 to September 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

United States anesthesiology residents.

INTERVENTIONS

A survey.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Reported training practices were as follows: 87.3% of respondents reported formal FoCUS training, and the most commonly reported training was "lectures + live-model training under 5 hours annually" at 31%. Most respondents (82%) stated that faculty never or rarely performed bedside FoCUS, and most respondents (69%) reported no intraoperative FoCUS education exposure. The proportion of residents who reported a positive view on the perceived feasibility of intraoperative FoCUS was 53.2% for extremity surgery, 19.8% for laparoscopic surgery, 18.6% for exploratory laparotomy surgery, and 7.9% for robotic surgery. Most respondents (78.6%) indicated a lack of confidence in performing intraoperative FoCUS independently. The authors found no statistical difference in views on feasibility or reported confidence independently performing FoCUS across training years. Training that included "lectures + simulation" or "live-model" for more than 5 hours annually, faculty routinely using bedside FoCUS, and frequent exposure to intraoperative FoCUS increased the odds of reporting confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The misconception that intraoperative FoCUS is infeasible appears prevalent, and most of the authors' respondents expressed a lack of comfort independently performing intraoperative FoCUS. Alterations of training practices, including increasing faculty usage of bedside ultrasonography, increasing trainee time performing FoCUS, and incorporating specific intraoperative ultrasound into the ultrasound curriculum, may address these deficiencies.

Current Use, Training, and Barriers of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Anesthesiology: A National Survey of Veterans Affairs Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine current use, training needs, and barriers to point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use among anesthesiologists in practice.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Anesthesiology departments in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Chiefs of staff and chiefs of anesthesiology departments.

INTERVENTIONS

A web-based survey was conducted between June 2019 and March 2020. Chiefs of staff answered questions about facility-level POCUS use, training, competency, and policies. Anesthesiology chiefs responded to a follow-up survey with specialty-specific POCUS questions. The results of the 2020 survey were compared with a similar survey conducted by the authors' group in 2015.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All chiefs of staff (n = 130) and 77% of anesthesiology chiefs (n = 96) completed the survey. The most common POCUS applications used were central and peripheral vascular access (69%-72%), peripheral nerve blocks (66%), and evaluation of cardiac function (29%-31%). Compared with 2015, there was a statistically significant increase in desire for training (p = 0.00015), but no significant change in POCUS use (p = 0.31). Training was most desired for volume-status assessment (52%), left ventricular function (47%), pneumothorax (47%), central line placement (40%), peripheral nerve blocks (40%), and pleural effusion (40%). The most common barriers to POCUS use were lack of funding for training (35%), trained providers (33%), and training opportunities (28%).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant increase in desire for POCUS training was seen among anesthesiologists practicing in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system since 2015, and lack of training continues to be a top barrier for POCUS use among anesthesiologists.

Use of an ultrasound-guided intravenous catheter insertion simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to improve paediatric anaesthesia care

Background

We previously showed that an ultrasound-guided i.v. catheter insertion (USGIV) simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum improves the simulated USGIV skills of paediatric anaesthesiologists. It remains unclear if improvements in simulated USGIV skills translate to improved patient care.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted from August 2018 to August 2020 to evaluate paediatric anaesthesiologists' USGIV performance in the operating theatre before and after they participated in the USGIV SBML curriculum. Paediatric anaesthesiologists' use of ultrasound for successful i.v. insertion and first-attempt i.v. insertion success rate with ultrasound were compared before and after training.

Results

Twenty-nine paediatric anaesthesiologists completed training. Unadjusted analysis showed a significant increase in the percentage of i.v. catheters inserted with ultrasound for successful i.v. catheter insertion (9.5-14.5%; P<0.001) and first i.v. catheter insertion attempt success with ultrasound (5.5-8.9%; P<0.001) from before to after training. Multivariable regression analysis showed higher odds of ultrasound use for a successful i.v. catheter attempt (1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.90; P=0.018) and first-attempt success with ultrasound (4.11; 95% CI: 2.02-8.37; P<0.001) after training.

Conclusions

After completing the USGIV SBML curriculum, paediatric anaesthesiologists increased their ultrasound use for successful i.v. catheter insertion and first-attempt success rate with ultrasound for patients in the operating theatre.

Competence of anesthesiology residents following a longitudinal point-of-care ultrasound curriculum

PURPOSE

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) facilitates diagnostic, procedural, and resuscitative applications in anesthesiology. Structured POCUS curricula improve learner satisfaction, test scores, and clinical management, but the learning curve towards competency and retention of skills over time remain unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study to determine when anesthesiology trainees enrolled in a POCUS curriculum achieve competency in POCUS skills. We also investigated the learning curve of trainees' competency using a POCUS-specific competency-based medical education assessment. The structured, longitudinal POCUS curriculum included online lectures, journal articles, live model scanning sessions, video review of cases, and a portfolio of supervised scans. Point-of-care ultrasound scanning sessions on standardized patients were conducted in the simulation lab for 2.5 hr a week and each resident completed eight sessions (20 hr) per academic year. At each scanning session, timed image acquisition scores were collected and POCUS skills entrustment scale evaluations were conducted. The primary outcome was the number of supervised scans and sessions required to achieve a mean entrustment score of 4 ("may use independently"). Secondary outcomes included image acquisition scores and retention of skills after six months.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) number of supervised scans required for trainees (n = 29) to reach a mean entrustment score of ≥ 4 was 36 (10) scans over nine sessions for rescue echo. A mean entrustment score of ≥ 4 was observed for lung ultrasound after a mean (SD) of 8 (3) scans over two sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that anesthesiology residents can achieve competence in rescue echo and lung ultrasound through participation in a structured, longitudinal POCUS curriculum, and outlines the learning curve for progression towards competency.

Point of care ultrasound training in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs

OBJECTIVES

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been endorsed as an important clinical tool by the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) and is a training objective of emergency medicine (EM) residency programs accredited by both the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC). Our objectives are to describe the national state of POCUS training in RCPSC-EM and CFPC-EM residency programs and to evaluate the implementation of the CAEP core POCUS curriculum in these programs.

METHODS

This was an online survey study of all POCUS education leads for both RCPSC-EM and CFPC-EM programs. The survey queried participants on program demographics, description of POCUS training, methods of POCUS assessment, and implementation of the CAEP core POCUS curriculum.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% (39/39). All RCPSC-EM and CFPC-EM programs provide POCUS training for their residents, and 100% of RCPSC-EM programs and 91% (20/22) of CFPC-EM programs have a POCUS lead. All programs provide POCUS training for their residents, but there is variability in how POCUS is introduced to residents, ongoing POCUS instruction provided throughout residency, and POCUS assessment. Only 47% (8/17) of RCPSC-EM and 32% (7/22) of CFPC-EM programs have a quality assurance process for the use of POCUS by their residents. POCUS leads believe their residents are proficient in the CAEP core POCUS applications by the end of training except for advanced cardiac and thoracic ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS training in Canadian EM programs is prevalent, but there is variability in support for POCUS leads, delivery of training, determination of proficiency, and presence of quality assurance. While almost all programs deliver POCUS education aligning with the CAEP core POCUS curriculum position statement, more support is required both locally and nationally for sharing best practices for POCUS education.

Taking the Pulse of POCUS: The State of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital

We aim to quantify and categorize point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) usage by pediatric practitioners and trainees at our tertiary care center, and assess the degree of interest from pediatric residents, fellows, and program leaders for integrating POCUS into their training. Data was collected via online survey, evaluating the current use of POCUS in clinical decision making, desire for further formal training, and opinions on the importance of POCUS to future clinical practice. In total, 14 program directors/assistant program directors (PD/APDs) representing 10 of 15 training programs, 30 of 95 fellows representing 9 of 15 fellowships, and 32 of 82 residents responded. From PD/APDs, only 2 of the programs reported active use POCUS for clinical decision making, but 13 of the fellows and 9 residents reported doing so. In regard to desire for a formal POCUS program, 30.8% of PD/APDs, 43.8% of fellows without current curricula, and 87.5% of residents were interested in participating in such a program. When considering specialty, some non-acute care-based PD/APDs and fellows at our institution felt that POCUS was important to future practice. Pediatric subspecialty PD/APDs and their fellows had divergent outlooks on the importance of POCUS in future practice. Finally, an overwhelming majority of residents at our institution expressed a desire to learn, and half believing it will be important to future practice. Based on the degree of interest, medicolegal considerations, and trajectory of patient care, pediatric residency and fellowship programs should strongly consider integrating POCUS education into their curricula.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Before and After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Surgical aortic valve replacement requires a comprehensive transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) assessment before and after the intervention by cardiac anaesthesiologists. For patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI), TEE is not routinely used. We started using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a diagnostic and monitoring modality during TF-TAVI procedures. The aim of this study is to examine the usefulness of TTE before and after TF-TAVI. We hypothesised that TTE can serve as a screening tool in TF-TAVI patients and help rule out significant paravalvular leaks (PVLs), and serve as a monitoring tool.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study of 24 patients who underwent TF-TAVI with perioperative TTE over a 3-month period was conducted. Intraoperatively, two TTE examinations were performed. The first was a baseline pre-procedural TTE examination after anaesthetic induction, and the second was performed after TAVI valve implantation. Both pre- and post-procedural examinations included five focused TTE views. PVLs were graded as none, non-significant (trace or mild) or significant (moderate or severe).

RESULTS

The average age and median body mass index of the patients were 82 years and 28.5 kg m-2, respectively. The average time recorded for the pre- and post-TAVI TTE examinations were approximately 4 and 5.5 min, respectively. Non-significant PVL was detected in 6 (25%) patients, and no leak was detected in 18 (75%) patients.

CONCLUSION

A focused TTE examination was found to be a useful adjunct during TF-TAVI for a cardiac anaesthesiologist in the absence of TEE, and useful in ruling out significant PVLs.

Barriers to learning and using point-of-care ultrasound: a survey of practicing internists in six North American institutions

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in internal medicine, but a lack of trained faculty continues to limit the spread of POCUS education. Using a framework based on organizational change theories, this study sought to identify barriers and enablers for hospital-based practicing internists to learn and use POCUS in clinical practice.

Methods

We invited practicing internists at six North American institutions to participate in an electronic survey on their opinions regarding 39 barriers and enablers.

Results

Of the 342 participants invited, 170 participated (response rate 49.3%). The top barriers were lack of training (79%), lack of handheld ultrasound devices (78%), lack of direct supervision (65%), lack of time to perform POCUS during rounds (65%), and lack of quality assurance processes (53%). The majority of participants (55%) disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement “My institution provides funding for POCUS training.” In general, participants’ attitudes towards POCUS were favourable, and future career opportunities and the potential for billing were not considered significant factors by our participants in the decision to learn or use POCUS.

Conclusions

This survey confirms the perceived importance of POCUS to practicing internists. To assist in closing faculty development gap, interventions should address training, supervision, quality assurance processes, availability of handheld devices, as well as dedicated time to perform POCUS during clinical care.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the upper airway

Airway management is a critical skill in the practice of several medical specialities including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care. Over the years mounting evidence has showed an increasing role of ultrasound (US) in airway management. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the indications for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the upper airway. The use of US to guide and assist clinical airway management has potential benefits for both provider and patient. Ultrasound can be utilized to determine airway size and predict the appropriate diameter of single-lumen endotracheal tubes (ETTs), double-lumen ETTs, and tracheostomy tubes. Ultrasonography can differentiate tracheal, esophageal, and endobronchial intubation. Ultrasonography of the neck can accurately localize the cricothyroid membrane for emergency airway access and similarly identify tracheal rings for US-guided tracheostomy. In addition, US can identify vocal cord dysfunction and pathology before induction of anesthesia. A rapidly growing body of evidence showing ultrasonography used in conjunction with hands-on management of the airway may benefit patient care. Increasing awareness and use of POCUS for many indications have resulted in technologic advancements and increased accessibility and portability. Upper airway POCUS has the potential to become the first-line non-invasive adjunct assessment tool in airway management.

Focused assessment with sonography in trauma: a review of concepts and considerations for anesthesiology

The use of point-of-care ultrasound in trauma provides diagnostic clarity and routinely influences management. A scanning protocol known as the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) has been widely adopted by trauma providers of all specialties. The FAST exam addresses a broad array of pathologic conditions capable of causing instability, including hemoperitoneum, hemopericardium, hemothorax, and pneumothorax. The exam is an integral component to the primary assessment of injured patients and an iconic application of point-of-care ultrasound.This review article aims to summarize the application of the FAST exam with special consideration, where relevant, to anesthesiologists. The scope of the FAST exam, technical considerations, and clinical decision-making in trauma are explored.