Ultrasound-guided radial nerve block to relieve cannulation-induced radial arterial spasm

Retained radial catheters associated with variant radial anatomy in neurointerventional procedures

BACKGROUND

Transradial artery access (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures is gaining widespread acceptance. However, complications that were previously rare may arise as TRA procedures increase. Here we report a series of retained catheter cases with a literature review.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a neurointerventional procedure during a 23-month period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for a retained catheter in TRA cases. In cases of retained catheters, imaging was reviewed for anatomical variances in the radial artery, and clinical and demographic case details were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1386 nondiagnostic neurointerventional procedures were performed during the study period, 631 (46%) initially via TRA. The 631 TRA cases were performed for aneurysm embolization (n=221, 35%), mechanical thrombectomy (n=116, 18%), carotid stent/angioplasty (n=40, 6%), arteriovenous malformation embolization (n=38, 6%), and other reasons (n=216, 34%). Thirty-nine (6%) TRA procedures crossed over to femoral access, most commonly because the artery of interest could not be catheterized (26/39, 67%). A retained catheter was identified in five cases (1%), and one (0.2%) patient had an entrapped catheter that was recovered. All six patients with a retained or entrapped catheter had aberrant radial anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Retained catheters for neurointerventional procedures performed via TRA are rare. However, this complication may be associated with variant radial anatomy. With the increased use of TRA for neurointerventional procedures, awareness of anatomical abnormalities that may lead to a retained catheter is necessary. We propose a simple protocol to avoid catheter entrapment, including in emergent situations such as TRA for stroke thrombectomy.

Risk factors for radial artery occlusion after neurointervention for unruptured intracranial aneurysm via transradial access

PURPOSE

Neurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is less invasive than via transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur with TRA. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for RAO after coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) via TRA.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for UIAs via TRA between March 2021 and March 2022 and were available for angiographic evaluation 1 year after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for RAO.

RESULTS

Seventeen (40%) of the 42 patients showed RAO. Compared with the non-RAO group, radial artery size was significantly smaller (2.2 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm]; p = 0.001) and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) was significantly higher in the RAO group. Multivariate analysis identified radial artery size (odds ratio [OR] 4.9 × 10^-3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4 × 10^-5-0.38) and incidence of RAS (OR 14.8, 95%CI 2.1-105) as significant independent predictors of subsequent RAO. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for radial artery size was 2.5 mm (sensitivity, 82.4%; specificity, 76.0%; area under the ROC curve, 0.80 [95%CI 0.66-0.95]).

CONCLUSION

Radial artery size and RAS represent reliable parameters for predicting RAO 1 year after coil embolization for UIA via TRA. Prophylaxis against RAS and limiting neurointervention via TRA to patients with radial artery larger than 2.5 mm in diameter may reduce the risk of postoperative RAO.

Echocardiogram-Guided Stenting of a Critical Aortic Coarctation in an Extremely Low Weight Preterm Infant

We report a case of critical aortic coarctation in an extremely low birth weight preterm infant weighing 600 g that was successfully treated with interventional stent implantation. The intervention was guided by echocardiography without using contrast agent due to associated renal failure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Radial Artery Spasm During Coronary Angiography

This study describes an attempt to develop a user-friendly nomogram incorporating psychological factors to individually predict the risk of radial artery spasm. Patients consecutively recruited between June 2020 and June 2021 constituted the development cohort for retrospective analysis of the development of a prediction model. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression combined with clinical significance was employed to screen out appropriate independent variables. The model's discrimination and calibration were subsequently evaluated and calibrated by using the C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration plot. Decision curve analysis was also performed to evaluate the net benefit with the nomogram, and internal validation was assessed using bootstrapping validation. The predictors included in the risk nomogram included "body mass index ," "anxiety score," "duration of interventional surgery," "latency time (time spent waiting in the catheterization laboratory)," "vascular circuity (substantial changes in the curvature of vessels)," and "puncture number." The derived model showed good discrimination with an area under the ROC curve of .77, a C-index of .771 (95% CI: .72-.822) and good calibration. Decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram provided a better net benefit than the alternatives.

Radial artery access for neuroendovascular procedures: safety review and complications

Although enthusiasm for transradial access for neurointerventional procedures has grown, a unique set of considerations bear emphasis to preserve safety and minimize complications. In the first part of this review series, we reviewed anatomical considerations for safe and easy neuroendovascular procedures from a transradial approach. In this second part of the review series, we aim to (1) summarize evidence for safety of the transradial approach, and (2) explain complications and their management.

Does radial or median nerve blocks affect the area and blood flow of radial artery?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Radial artery is a common site of cannulation in acute care setting. There are conflicting reports as to which nerve, radial or median or both supplies the radial artery. We did this prospective study in patients undergoing minor procedures under peripheral nerve blocks to ascertain which nerve block, radial or median increases the cross sectional area and blood flow in the radial artery.

METHODS

Ninety ASA I/II patients undergoing upper limb minor surgeries under various blocks (radial or median or radial + median nerve) were enrolled in this study. Patients in group R were those who received Ultrasound-guided (USG) radial nerve block, group M median nerve block while group MR received both the nerve blocks. The primary objective was to assess the increase in cross sectional area (CSA) of radial artery in the groups after the block. Secondary objectives included assessment of time average maximum velocity (TAMAX) and blood volume (BV) after the block.

RESULTS

The CSA, TAMAX and BV of radial artery increased in all the three groups. Within each group the difference between the preblock and postblock parameters were highly significant. However, the differences are greater in groups M and M + R than in group R; (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided median nerve block causes arterial vasodilation, and an increase in radial artery blood flow velocity. There was no added benefit of radial block along with median block in increasing the blood flow further.

Transradial Artery Access Complications

Transradial access (TRA) is favored over transfemoral access for performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention due to the reduced risk for vascular and bleeding complications and the documented survival benefit in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. TRA complications can be categorized as intra- or postprocedural and further categorized as related to bleeding or nonbleeding issues. Major intra- and postprocedural complications such as radial artery perforation and compartment syndrome are rare following TRA. Their occurrence, however, can be associated with morbid consequences, including requirement for surgical intervention if not identified and treated promptly. Nonbleeding complications such as radial artery spasm and radial artery occlusion are typically less morbid but occur much more frequently. Strategies to prevent TRA complications are essential and include the use of contemporary access techniques that limit arterial injury. This document summarizes contemporary techniques to prevent, identify, and manage TRA complications.