1
|
Kadowaki M, Sugiyama K, Nozaki T, Yamasaki T, Namba H, Shimizu M, Kurozumi K. Scalp Nerve Block Alleviates Headaches Associated With Sonication During Transcranial Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound. Neurosurgery 2024; 95:447-455. [PMID: 38687082 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) procedures, headache is a frequent symptom and cause of treatment discontinuation. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of scalp nerve block (SNB) for alleviating headache during MRgFUS procedures. METHODS The effect of SNB on intraprocedural headache was examined by retrospectively comparing 2 patient cohorts at a single institution. During the study period from April 2020 to February 2022, an SNB protocol for all patients with a skull density ratio ≤0.55 was instituted on October 6, 2021. The number of patients with a skull density ratio ≤0.55 was 34 before the protocol and 36 afterward. Headache intensity was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) after each sonication. To evaluate the effect of SNB on headache intensity, multiple regression analysis was performed per patient and per sonication. In the per-patient analysis, the effect of SNB was evaluated using the maximum NRS, mean NRS, and NRS at the first ultrasound exposure that reached 52.5°C. In the per-sonication analysis, the effect of SNB was evaluated not only for the entire sonication but also for sonications classified into ≤9999 J, 10 000 to 29 999 J, and ≥30 000 J energy doses. RESULTS With SNB, headache alleviation was observed in the NRS after the first sonication that reached 52.5°C in each patient (β = -2.40, 95% CI -4.05 to -0.758, P = .00499), in the NRS when all sonications were evaluated (β = -0.647, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.106, P = .0201), and in the NRS when all sonications were classified into 10 000 to 29 999 J (β = -1.83, 95% CI -3.17 to -0.485, P = .00889). CONCLUSION SNB significantly reduced headache intensity during MRgFUS, especially that caused by sonication with a moderate-energy dose. These findings suggest that scalp nerves play a role in headache mechanisms during MRgFUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Kadowaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu , Shizuoka , Japan
| | - Kenji Sugiyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toyoda Eisei Hospital, Iwata , Shizuoka , Japan
| | - Takao Nozaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu , Shizuoka , Japan
| | - Tomohiro Yamasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu , Shizuoka , Japan
| | - Hiroki Namba
- Department of Neurosurgery, JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital, Hamamatsu , Shizuoka , Japan
| | - Mikihiro Shimizu
- Center for Clinical Research, Hamamatsu University Hospital, Hamamatsu , Shizuoka , Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Kurozumi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu , Shizuoka , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mueller JM, Chiu LT, Lynn F, Lewis RG, Patel S, Wodziak M, Patel N, Sani S. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound without Anesthesiologist Support. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2024; 102:169-178. [PMID: 38657586 DOI: 10.1159/000537695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an effective treatment option for essential tremor (ET) and tremor dominant Parkinson's disease (TDPD), which is often performed with sedation or in the presence of an anesthesiologist in an effort to minimize adverse events and maximize patient comfort. This study explores the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of performing MRgFUS without an anesthesiologist. METHODS This is a single academic center, retrospective review of 180 ET and TDPD patients who underwent MRgFUS treatment without anesthesiologist support. Patient demographics, intra-procedural treatment parameters, peri-procedural adverse events, and 3-month Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor Part B (CRST-B) scores were compared to MRgFUS studies that utilized varying degrees of anesthesia. RESULTS There were no anesthesia related adverse events or unsuccessful treatments. There were no early treatment terminations due to patient discomfort, regardless of skull density ratio. 94.6% of patients would repeat the procedure again. The most common side effects during treatment were facial/tongue paresthesia (26.3%), followed by nausea (22.3%), dysarthria (8.6%), and scalp pain (8.0%). No anxiolytic, pain, or antihypertensive medications were administered. The most common early adverse event after MRgFUS procedure was gait imbalance (58.3%). There was a significant reduction of 83.1% (83.4% ET and 80.5% TDPD) of the mean CRST-B scores of the treated hand when comparing 3-month and baseline scores (1.8 vs. 10.9, n = 109, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION MRgFUS without intra-procedural anesthesiologist support is a safe, feasible, and well-tolerated option, without an increase in peri-procedural adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M Mueller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA,
| | - Lucinda T Chiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Fiona Lynn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rachel G Lewis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shama Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Matthew Wodziak
- Department of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Neepa Patel
- Department of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sepehr Sani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamamoto K, Sarica C, Loh A, Vetkas A, Samuel N, Milano V, Zemmar A, Germann J, Cheyuo C, Boutet A, Elias GJ, Ito H, Taira T, Lozano AM. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of tremor. Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:849-861. [PMID: 36469578 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2147826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an emerging treatment for tremor and other movement disorders. An incisionless therapy, it is becoming increasingly common worldwide. However, given MRgFUS' relative novelty, there remain limited data on its benefits and adverse effects. AREAS COVERED We review the current state of evidence of MRgFUS for tremor, highlight its challenges, and discuss future perspectives. EXPERT OPINION Essential tremor (ET) has been the major indication for MRgFUS since a milestone randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2016, with substantial evidence attesting to the efficacy and acceptable safety profile of this treatment. Patients with other tremor etiologies are also being treated with MRgFUS, with studies - including an RCT - suggesting parkinsonian tremor in particular responds well to this intervention. Additionally, targets other than the ventral intermediate nucleus, such as the subthalamic nucleus and internal segment of the globus pallidus, have been reported to improve parkinsonian symptoms beyond tremor, including rigidity and bradykinesia. Although MRgFUS is encumbered by certain unique technical challenges, it nevertheless offers significant advantages compared to alternative neurosurgical interventions for tremor. The fast-growing interest in this treatment modality will likely lead to further scientific and technological advancements that could optimize and expand its therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Yamamoto
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Can Sarica
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Loh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Artur Vetkas
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia
| | - Nardin Samuel
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vanessa Milano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ajmal Zemmar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, School of Medicine, KY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan University School of Medicine, China
| | - Jürgen Germann
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cletus Cheyuo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandre Boutet
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gavin Jb Elias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hisashi Ito
- Department of Neurology, Shonantobu General Hospital, Japan.,Department of Neurology, Shonan Fujisawa Tokushukai Hospital, Japan
| | - Takaomi Taira
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cacho-Asenjo E, Honorato-Cia C, Nuñez-Cordoba JM, Fernandez-Martinez M, Gonzalez-Quarante LH, Aviles-Olmos I, Gorospe MA, Panadero A, Rodríguez-Oroz MC, Guridi J, Martinez-Simon A. Factors Associated with Headache and Nausea During Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Tremor. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:701-708. [PMID: 34307742 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background During magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for essential or parkinsonian tremor, adverse events (headache, nausea/vomiting, or anxiety) may alter the outcome of the procedure despite being mostly transient and mild. Objectives Our aim was to analyze the relationship between demographic, procedural, and anesthetic characteristics with magnetic resonance/ultrasound-related events. Methods This was a retrospective study at the Clinica Universidad de Navarra of patients undergoing thalamotomy with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound between September 2018 and October 2019. The anesthesia protocol included headache and nausea/vomiting prophylaxis and rescue therapy. Dexmedetomidine was used for anxiolysis in some patients after thorough multidisciplinary assessment. Results A total of 123 patients were included. Headache was directly related to skull density ratio (P < 0.001) and skull thickness (P = 0.02). Patients with a skull density ratio less than 0.48 had 3 times the odds of experiencing moderate or severe headache (odds ratio [OR], 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-7.82) and had a higher odds of aborting sonication due to pain. Sex was associated with increased nausea (P = 0.007). Women had 4 times the odds of nausea than men (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.61-12.11). Dexmedetomidine did not reduce headache or nausea incidence. Patients who received dexmedetomidine had a higher number (P = 0.01) and total minutes of sonication (P = 0.01). Conclusions Patients with lower skull density ratios and higher skull thicknesses could benefit from an aggressive analgesic prophylaxis. Women are more likely to experience nausea. Dexmedetomidine did not reduce headache and nausea, but increased the number and duration of sonications. Its exact effect on tremor is still unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Cacho-Asenjo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra Pamplona Spain
| | - Cristina Honorato-Cia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra Pamplona Spain
| | - Jorge M Nuñez-Cordoba
- Research Support Service, Central Clinical Trials Unit Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Alfredo Panadero
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
| | | | - Jorge Guridi
- Department of Neurosurgery Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
| | - Antonio Martinez-Simon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra Pamplona Spain
| |
Collapse
|