1
|
Kim S, Kim M, Kodra A. Risks and Benefits of Device-Assisted Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism. Int J Angiol 2024; 33:101-106. [PMID: 38846990 PMCID: PMC11152619 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the familiarity with this disease, the best treatment remains undefined. Traditionally, treatment of PE has involved a choice of anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery. However, the debate over pharmacologic versus mechanical treatment of acute PE reared up again with the advent of user-friendly mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy technologies. This is especially true for submassive PE, which is an area for potential growth both for understanding the pathophysiology of the disease process and management. Multiple devices are available for treatment of PE. Understanding the risks and benefits of each device is paramount in the complex management of PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital, New York
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital, New York
| | - Arber Kodra
- Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hobohm L, Farmakis IT, Duerschmied D, Keller K. The Current Evidence of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams and Their Role in Future. Hamostaseologie 2024; 44:172-181. [PMID: 38471662 DOI: 10.1055/a-2232-5395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a critical medical condition requiring prompt and accurate management. The introduction and growing significance of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT), also termed EXPERT-PE teams, signify a paradigm shift toward a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach in managing this complex entity. As the understanding of acute PE continues to evolve, PERTs stand as a linkage of optimized care, offering personalized and evidence-based management strategies for patients afflicted by this life-threatening condition. The evolving role of PERTs globally is evident in their increasing integration into the standard care pathways for acute PE. These teams have demonstrated benefits such as reducing time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, optimizing resource utilization, and improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Hobohm
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
- Center for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), and DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ioannis T Farmakis
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
- Center for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), and DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Duerschmied
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostasis, and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faulty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
- European Center for AngioScience (ECAS), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Heidelberg/ Mannheim, and Centre for Cardiovascular Acute Medicine Mannheim (ZKAM), Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Karsten Keller
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
- Center for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), and DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Sports Medicine, Internal Medicine VII, Medical Clinic, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Wit K, D'Arsigny CL. Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2023; 21:3016-3023. [PMID: 37187357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 5% of pulmonary embolism (PE) cases present with persistent hypotension, obstructive shock, or cardiac arrest. Given the high short-term mortality, management of high-risk PE cases focuses on immediate reperfusion therapies. Risk stratification of normotensive PE is important to identify patients with an elevated risk of hemodynamic collapse or an elevated risk of major bleeding. Risk stratification for short-term hemodynamic collapse includes assessment of physiological parameters, right heart dysfunction, and identification of comorbidities. Validated tools such as European Society of Cardiology guidelines and Bova score can identify normotensive patients with PE and an elevated risk of subsequent hemodynamic collapse. At present, we lack high-quality evidence to recommend one treatment over another (systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapy, or anticoagulation with close monitoring) for patients at elevated risk of hemodynamic collapse. Newer, less well-validated scores such as BACS and PE-CH may help identify patients at a high risk of major bleeding following systemic thrombolysis. The PE-SARD score may identify those at risk of major anticoagulant-associated bleeding. Patients at low risk of short-term adverse outcomes can be considered for outpatient management. The simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score or Hestia criteria are safe decision aids when combined with physician global assessment of the need for hospitalization following the diagnosis of PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin de Wit
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Götzinger F, Lauder L, Sharp ASP, Lang IM, Rosenkranz S, Konstantinides S, Edelman ER, Böhm M, Jaber W, Mahfoud F. Interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism. Nat Rev Cardiol 2023; 20:670-684. [PMID: 37173409 PMCID: PMC10180624 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-023-00876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the leading cause of in-hospital death and the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular death. The clinical presentation of PE is variable, and choosing the appropriate treatment for individual patients can be challenging. Traditionally, treatment of PE has involved a choice of anticoagulation, thrombolysis or surgery; however, a range of percutaneous interventional technologies have been developed that are under investigation in patients with intermediate-high-risk or high-risk PE. These interventional technologies include catheter-directed thrombolysis (with or without ultrasound assistance), aspiration thrombectomy and combinations of the aforementioned principles. These interventional treatment options might lead to a more rapid improvement in right ventricular function and pulmonary and/or systemic haemodynamics in particular patients. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials on the safety and efficacy of these interventions compared with conservative therapies is lacking. In this Review, we discuss the underlying pathophysiology of PE, provide assistance with decision-making on patient selection and critically appraise the available clinical evidence on interventional, catheter-based approaches for PE treatment. Finally, we discuss future perspectives and unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Götzinger
- Clinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Homburg, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Lucas Lauder
- Clinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Homburg, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Andrew S P Sharp
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Irene M Lang
- Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Rosenkranz
- Department of Cardiology - Internal Medicine III, Cologne University Heart Center, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Cardiovascular Research Center (CCRC), Cologne University Heart Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stavros Konstantinides
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Elazer R Edelman
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michael Böhm
- Clinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Homburg, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Wissam Jaber
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felix Mahfoud
- Clinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Homburg, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hobohm L, Farmakis IT, Keller K, Scibior B, Mavromanoli AC, Sagoschen I, Münzel T, Ahrens I, Konstantinides S. Pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) implementation and its clinical value across countries: a scoping review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 2023; 112:1351-1361. [PMID: 35976429 PMCID: PMC9383680 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02077-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last years, multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) have emerged to encounter the increasing variety and complexity in the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to systematically investigate the composition and added clinical value of PERTs. METHODS We searched PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science until January 2022 for articles designed to describe the structure and function of PERTs. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of controlled studies (PERT vs. pre-PERT era) to investigate the impact of PERTs on clinical outcomes and advanced therapies use. RESULTS We included 22 original studies and four surveys. Overall, 31.5% of patients with PE were evaluated by PERT referred mostly by emergency departments (59.4%). In 11 single-arm studies (1532 intermediate-risk and high-risk patients evaluated by PERT) mortality rate was 10%, bleeding rate 9% and length of stay 7.3 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-8.9]. In nine controlled studies there was no difference in mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.67-1.19] by comparing pre-PERT with PERT era. When analysing patients with intermediate or high-risk class only, the effect estimate for mortality tended to be lower for patients treated in the PERT era compared to those treated in the pre-PERT era (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.45-1.12). The use of advanced therapies was higher (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.29-5.50) and the in-hospital stay shorter (mean difference - 1.6 days) in PERT era compared to pre-PERT era. CONCLUSIONS PERT implementation led to greater use of advanced therapies and shorter in-hospital stay. Our meta-analysis did not show a survival benefit in patients with PE since PERT implementation. Large prospective studies are needed to further explore the impact of PERTs on clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/SBFK9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Hobohm
- Department of Cardiology, Center of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Ioannis T Farmakis
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Karsten Keller
- Department of Cardiology, Center of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- Medical Clinic VII, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Scibior
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anna C Mavromanoli
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ingo Sagoschen
- Department of Cardiology, Center of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- Department of Cardiology, Center of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ingo Ahrens
- Department of Cardiology and Medical Intensive Care, Augustinerinnen Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stavros Konstantinides
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Democritus University of Thrace, Thrace, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fleitas Sosa D, Lehr AL, Zhao H, Roth S, Lakhther V, Bashir R, Cohen G, Panaro J, Maldonado TS, Horowitz J, Amoroso NE, Criner GJ, Brosnahan SB, Rali P. Impact of pulmonary embolism response teams on acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31:31/165/220023. [PMID: 35831010 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0023-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) on treatment choice and outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is still uncertain. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of PERTs in the management and outcomes of patients with PE. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, WorldWideScience and MedRxiv were searched for original articles reporting PERT patient outcomes from 2009. Data were analysed using a random effects model. RESULTS 16 studies comprising 3827 PERT patients and 3967 controls met inclusion criteria. The PERT group had more patients with intermediate and high-risk PE (66.2%) compared to the control group (48.5%). Meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk of catheter-directed interventions, systemic thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy (odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-2.53; p<0.01), similar bleeding complications (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.88-1.37) and decreased utilisation of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.88; p<0.01) in the PERT group. Furthermore, there was a nonsignificant trend towards decreased mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.07; p=0.19) with PERTs. CONCLUSIONS The PERT group showed an increased use of advanced therapies and a decreased utilisation of IVC filters. This was not associated with increased bleeding. Despite comprising more severe PE patients, there was a trend towards lower mortality in the PERT group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derlis Fleitas Sosa
- Dept of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA .,Both authors contributed equally
| | - Andrew L Lehr
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.,Both authors contributed equally
| | - Huaqing Zhao
- Dept of Clinical Sciences, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephanie Roth
- Biomedical and Research Services Librarian, Simmy and Harry Ginsburg Library, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vlad Lakhther
- Dept of Cardiovascular Diseases, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Riyaz Bashir
- Dept of Cardiovascular Diseases, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary Cohen
- Dept of Radiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Panaro
- Dept of Radiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas S Maldonado
- Division of Vascular Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Horowitz
- Division of Cardiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy E Amoroso
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gerard J Criner
- Dept of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shari B Brosnahan
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parth Rali
- Dept of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lewis AE, Gerstein NS, Venkataramani R, Ramakrishna H. Evolving Management Trends and Outcomes in Catheter Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:3344-3356. [PMID: 34696967 PMCID: PMC8487849 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E Lewis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Neal S Gerstein
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Ranjani Venkataramani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Harish Ramakrishna
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|