A novel approach of using brachial plexus blockade as an experimental model for diagnosis of intraoperative nerve dysfunction with somatosensory evoked potentials: a blinded proof-of-concept study

Postoperative ulnar neuropathy: a systematic review of evidence with narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ulnar neuropathy (PUN) is an injury manifesting in the sensory or motor distribution of the ulnar nerve after anaesthesia or surgery. The condition frequently features in cases of alleged clinical negligence by anaesthetists. We performed a systematic review and applied narrative synthesis with the aim of summarising current understanding of the condition and deriving implications for practice and research.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched up to October 2022 for primary research, secondary research, or opinion pieces defining PUN and describing its incidence, predisposing factors, mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention.

RESULTS

We included 83 articles in the thematic analysis. PUN occurs after approximately 1 in 14 733 anaesthetics. Men aged 50-75 yr with pre-existing ulnar neuropathy are at highest risk. Preventative measures, based on consensus and expert opinion, are summarised, and an algorithm of suspected PUN management is proposed, based upon the identified literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative ulnar neuropathy is rare and the incidence is probably decreasing over time with general improvements in perioperative care. Recommendations to reduce the risk of postoperative ulnar neuropathy are based on low-quality evidence but include anatomically neutral arm positioning and padding intraoperatively. In selected high-risk patients, further documentation of repositioning, intermittent checks, and neurological examination in the recovery room can be helpful.

Preventing patient positioning injuries in the nonoperating room setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postprocedural positioning injuries are an under-appreciated source of morbidity for patients. These injuries may not present until days after anesthesia and may be missed for multiple reasons including the distracting injury of the procedural site, illness of the patient, lack of follow-up, and insufficient awareness of this type of injury. Risks for these adverse events are exacerbated in the nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) population for several reasons. These patients tend to be older and sicker than patients presenting to the operating room, increasing the risk of an injury. Proceduralists and anesthesia providers are usually consultants, not the primary care team, so may have limited patient follow-up. This review will discuss the risk factors for position-related injuries and how to prevent them with proper positioning and padding.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mainstay of preventing periprocedural positioning injuries is careful positioning of the patient and proper padding of pressure points. This may be particularly challenging because of physical constraints and positioning requirements for NORA procedures, as well as preference for radiolucent positioning materials. Recent studies have shown the potential benefit of monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in high-risk patients.

SUMMARY

Careful consideration of patient positioning and thorough understanding of peripheral nerve and pressure injuries is essential for anesthesia providers to avoid positioning injuries during NORA procedures.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COAN/A87.