Strategies for intraoperative glucose management: a scoping review

The pharmacist's role in optimizing medication management before, during, and after minimally invasive and bariatric surgery

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with integrated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) helps reduce length of stay and improve surgical outcomes. As these procedures have become more prevalent over time, pharmacists are in key positions to manage medications in the perioperative space to help optimize transitions of care and reduce safety events. Here we identify several clinical areas across phases of care for these procedures in which the knowledge and guidance of pharmacists, as members of the interprofessional team, are paramount.

SUMMARY

Perioperative pharmacy expertise is often required for MIS procedures in the areas of acid suppression, antithrombotic management, blood glucose control, drug formulation, immunosuppressant optimization, pain mitigation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention and treatment. For each MIS procedure, pharmacists should identify and consider diet and anatomical changes as well as patient- and surgery-specific risk factors. Pharmacists can then utilize their knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of individual medications along with evidence-based medicine to recommend selection of appropriate agents.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist contributions to perioperative medication management for MIS procedures can improve care as surgical patients navigate transitions through the perioperative setting. Pharmacists can further incorporate medication expertise through development and implementation of institutional MIS protocols within the context of ERPs. As such, any pharmacist should feel empowered to aid in the care of surgical patients.

Implementation of a Perioperative Glycemic Management Quality Improvement Pathway in Gynecologic Oncology Patients: A Single-cohort Interrupted Time-series Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated implementation and clinical outcomes of a perioperative glycemic management pathway in gynecologic oncology.

METHODS

Interrupted time-series analysis was used to compare process, balancing and outcome measures and clinical outcomes from 18 months preimplementation to 18 months postimplementation.

RESULTS

Compared with in the preimplementation period, the proportion of patients who underwent preoperative screening with glycated hemoglobin in the postimplementation period increased by 11.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 17.7%; p=0.001). The proportion of patients with diabetes who had at least 1 blood glucose measurement after surgery increased by 15.3% (95% CI, -3.2% to 33.8%; p=0.10). There was no change in the proportion of patients who had any hyperglycemia or moderate or severe hyperglycemia. The median length of stay decreased by 0.42 days (95% CI, -0.91 to 0.07 days; p=0.09). There were major quality gaps in perioperative glycemic management that did not clearly improve after implementation of a multidisciplinary care pathway.

CONCLUSION

Optimal strategies for improvement of perioperative glycemic management are not yet known.