Management and Treatment Outcomes of Maxillofacial Fibro-osseous Lesions: A Retrospective Study

Single stage maxillofacial reconstruction combined radical surgery for managing juvenile ossifying fibroma: A case report

Ossifying fibroma (OF) in craniofacial is a rare disease, benign, locally aggressive fibro-osseous tumor. The 2017 World Health Organization classifications divided OF into two types: OF of odontogenic origin and juvenile ossifying fibroma (JOF). Determining the right surgical treatment to reduce the postoperative recurrence rate is incredibly challenging. The author reports two cases of paranasal sinuses with disease onset progressed from pre-pubertal age. The first case is an example of a recurrent case after undergoing conservative surgery, and the second is a new one. All cases underwent radical surgery with subtotal maxillectomy and reconstructive surgery in one stage. After observing all patients until one year, there was no sign of recurrence through clinical and endoscopic examination. There are two types of surgery that compare in this case report: conservative surgery and radical surgery. Conservative surgical procedures include curettage, enucleation, or peripheral osteotomies. Several studies have shown high recurrence levels in OF patients when curettage or enucleation is performed; residue caused by incomplete excision is the most common reason that is easily caused by conservative surgery. Radical surgery such as open maxillectomy is a promising approach for degrading the level of recurrence. JOF, especially trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma, shows a high recurrence percentage comparing other types. The first-choice management for treating OF was the surgical approach. Types of surgery depend on the disease's aggressiveness and morbidity. Radical surgery was proven better at decreasing recurrence level than conservative surgery.

Clinical, Radiological, and Pathological Diagnosis of Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: A Retrospective Study

Background: Fibro-osseous lesions (FOL) of the jaw represent a rare, benign group of lesions that share similar clinical, radiological, and histopathological features and are characterized by progressive, variable replacement of healthy bone tissue by fibrous connective tissue. Methods: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence of fibro-osseous lesions and to reassess the efficacy of case-specific treatment management from a clinical, radiological, and histopathological perspective based on 14 years of data. Results: Forty-four patients with a radiological and/or histopathological diagnosis of benign FOLs were identified and re-evaluated. Cemento-osseous dysplasia was the most common group of FOLs present in our patient cohort (45%), followed by ossifying fibroma (39%) and fibrous dysplasia (16%). The diagnostic imaging technique of choice was CBCT (68%), followed by PAN (18%), with most patients (95 %) additionally undergoing biopsy. The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 40.54 ± 13.7 years, with most lesions being located in the mandible (86%), with females being predominantly affected (73%). Conclusion: An interdisciplinary approach that analyzes all case-specific factors, including demographic data, medical history, intraoperative findings, and, most importantly, histopathological and radiological features, is essential for an accurate diagnosis and key to avoiding inappropriate treatment.

Comparison radical surgery versus conservative surgery to decrease post-operative recurrence in ossifying fibroma: systematic review

Background: Ossifying fibroma in craniofacial is a rare disease, benign, locally aggressive fibro-osseous tumor. In the recent 2017 WHO classifications, ossifying fibroma divided into 2 type, ossifying fibroma of odontogenic origin and juvenile ossifying fibroma. Choosing the right treatment that can reduce the recurrence rate are particularly challenging. In this systematic review we try to analyse related study to determine the best treatment for ossifying fibroma. Aim: The aim of this review to evaluate best treatment option and analysed level of recurrence in each type of treatment. Method: Collected Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma (JOF) and Ossifying Fibroma (OF) related Article from four different database (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Proquest). Study selection was done by using PRISMA strategy. Result: Eight retrospective case series studies were analyzed. Recurrence rate after surgery was 15.3%, most frequent recurrence occurs in conservative surgery. Recurrence rate after conservative surgery was 19.7%, compared with radical surgery which relatively lower in percentage, with recurrence rate after surgery was 10.6%. Conclusion: Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma, especially Trabecular Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma (TrJOF), show high recurrence percentage comparing other type. The first-choice management for treating OF was surgical approach. Types of surgery choose to depend on the aggressiveness and morbidity of the disease. Radical surgery was proven better to decrease level of recurrence compared with conservative surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Fibroosseous Lesion in Young Patient with Reduced Mouth Opening

Fibrous dysplasia is a benign fibroosseous disorder that can affect the maxillary bones, causing aesthetic deformity and functional impairment. This article reports the case of a 13-year-old male patient at the time of diagnosis. The patient showed increased facial volume with relevant asymmetry, having reported the onset of the condition 12 months before. Upon examination, the patient presented an 8-mm mouth opening and an acute inflammatory process associated with tooth 37 pericoronal hood. Upon imaging exam, exuberant bone growth in the left mandibular ramus area of ground glass aspect was observed. After incisional biopsy, fibrous dysplasia was diagnosed and sequentially treated with osteoplasty and coronoid process removal. The patient evolved to a 43-mm mouth opening and favorable aesthetics without recurrence in a 3-year follow-up period. In this case, coronoidectomy and bone plasty proved to be effective, returning aesthetics and function. The patient is supposed to be followed up in the long term.

Retrospective Study of 383 Cases of Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Jaws

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to describe the clinical and radiologic features of 383 fibro-osseous lesions (FOLs) from an oral pathology reference service in Brazil and to compare the findings with previous studies. The hypothesis of the study was that the most common type of FOL would differ from other investigations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study with review of the records of the clinical and biopsy services (1990 to 2015). All records of the patients included showed a definitive diagnosis of FOL. The primary outcome variable was the type of FOL, and the predictor variables were gender, age, ethnicity, location, and clinical and radiologic characteristics. Descriptive analyses and χ² tests were performed. The P value was set at .05.

RESULTS

From the 27,998 records available, 383 showed FOLs, with 187 (48.8%) being cemento-osseous dysplasias (CODs), 103 (26.9%) being fibrous dysplasias (FDs), and 93 (24.3%) being ossifying fibromas (OFs). The mean age of the patients was 38.5 ± 17.5 years. CODs presented a predilection for female gender (n = 314, 82.0%), African descent (n = 134, 71.6%), and the mandible (n = 248, 64.6%). The most common radiologic feature was a mixed radiolucent-radiopaque image (n = 149, 51.7%). FDs and OFs were commonly diagnosed during the first and second decades of life (P < .001), whereas CODs were more frequently diagnosed beyond the third decade (P < .001). Secondary osteomyelitis was more significantly observed in CODs (P < .001) than in FDs and OFs. Swelling was more frequently reported for FDs and OFs than for CODs (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

CODs were the most frequently observed FOLs in this Brazilian population. Female patients, patients of African descent, and patients with mandibular localization were most commonly affected by these conditions. The most common type of FOL differed from that in similar case reports or series from various geographic locations. It is believed that the data source (clinical and/or biopsy services) can directly influence the outcome.

Management of Large Maxillomandibular Osteofibrous Dysplasia as Part of a Humanitarian Mission

PURPOSE

Maxillomandibular ossifying fibroma is a benign tumor that affects young adults. Complete excision can allow satisfactory management with no recurrence. During a humanitarian mission, one is confronted with many types of damage from these fibromas. Their management requires wide resection (mandibulectomy interrupter or maxillectomy) and free flap reconstruction. However, technical conditions during a humanitarian mission might not allow the performance of a free flap reconstruction. How can such patients be managed? Should these patients receive a straightforward intervention performed on site during the mission or should they go to another country with a technical platform suitable for microsurgical reconstruction?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a humanitarian mission in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 6 patients with large ossifying fibromas traveled to France to undergo wide excision of the lesion and free flap reconstruction using the fibula. The Enfants du Noma paid for the travel and medical costs.

RESULTS

No flap was lost. Four patients (67%) had local (disunity of scar or local infection) or general (malaria) complications that quickly resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

Most teams agree that free flaps should not be performed during humanitarian missions, and only 1 German team practices in Sokoto, Nigeria. Therefore, medical travel is an attractive solution that allows optimal management and requires financial assistance from humanitarian organizations.