Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy

Analysis of the implementation of a circuit for intra-operative superposition and comparison of the surgical outcomes using ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery

PURPOSE

This paper describes a novel circuit for intraoperative analysis with ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery. The aim is to establish guidelines, define indications, and conduct an analysis of the implementation of the circuit for intraoperative comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to 3D virtual planning in maxillofacial surgery.

METHODS

The study included 150 maxillofacial surgical procedures. Intraoperative actions involved fluoroscopy localization, intraoperative CBCT acquisition, segmentation, and superimposition, among other steps. Surgical times due to intraoperative superposition were measured, including time required for ICBCT positioning and acquisition, image segmentation, and comparison of 3D surfaces from the surgical planning.

RESULTS

Successful intraoperative comparison was achieved in all 150 cases, enabling surgeons to detect and address modifications before concluding the surgery. Out of the total, 26 patients (17.33%) required intraoperative revisions, with 11 cases (7.33%) needing major surgical revisions. On average, the additional surgical time with this circuit implementation was 10.66 ± 3.03 min (n = 22).

CONCLUSION

The results of our research demonstrate the potential for performing intraoperative surgical revision, allowing for immediate evaluation, enhancing surgical outcomes, and reducing the need for re-interventions.

Postoperative complications following orthognathic surgery in patients with rheumatic diseases: A 2-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the complications following orthognathic surgery in patients with rheumatic diseases and to evaluate rheumatic disease as a possible risk factor.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted during a 6-year period. The sample consisted of rheumatic and healthy patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. The outcome variables included infection, relapse, respiratory complications, hemorrhage, neurosensory disturbances, temporomandibular joint complications, and removal of osteosynthesis material. Bivariate analysis and logistic regression were applied to identify rheumatic disease as an independent risk factor for complications after orthognathic surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified as having rheumatic diseases (male: 2; female: 18; mean age: 37.8 ± 13.6 years), and 278 patients were systemically healthy (male: 105; female: 173; mean age: 25.8 ± 11.8 years). The most frequent complications in rheumatic and healthy patients were delayed recovery from neurosensory disturbance (55% and 33%), removal of osteosynthesis material (45% and 26%), and infection (35% and 7%). Following adjustment for possible confounders, rheumatic disease showed a significant association with infection (OR = 4.191, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Patients with rheumatic diseases are at a higher risk of postoperative infection following orthognathic surgery compared to healthy patients.

The Last 40 Years of Orthognathic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis

PURPOSE

Bibliometric analyses provide information on the effectiveness, performance, trends, and various other characteristics of research by using mathematical and statistical analysis methods for data related to scientific publications. This study aims to determine the focus of studies in the field of orthognathic surgery, map it, and present the results in a simplified manner through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the relevant literature.

METHODS

In this bibliometric analysis study, orthognathic surgery publications from 1980 to 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The independent variables were co-citations, while the outcome variables included cross-country collaboration analysis, keyword analysis, co-citation analysis, and cluster analysis of the co-citation network. Covariates were the number of publications, number of citations, year range, centrality value, and silhouette value. The bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R-Studio software.

RESULTS

A total of 7,135 publications and 75,822 references were included in the analysis, and the annual growth rate of publications was 9.52%. The co-citation clustering analysis revealed that the orthognathic surgery literature was organized into 16 subject headings. Patient satisfaction was found to be the most widely published topic. The youngest clusters, representing new topics in the field, were virtual planning and examination of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Bibliometric analysis methods were used to evaluate the 40-year history of the orthognathic surgery literature. The analysis identified the most influential publications, the topics in which the literature is divided, and hot spots in the field. By conducting similar bibliometric research studies in the future, the progress and future direction of the literature can be monitored based on evidence.