Is Eminectomy Effective in the Management of Chronic Closed Lock?

State of the Art in Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis-A Systematic Review

Temporomandibular joint disorders are a heterogenic group of clinical conditions, which impair physiological functioning of the masticatory system. Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint has become a widely approved method for non-invasive treatment, bridging the gap between conservative and surgical approaches. Regardless of technique, treatment is based upon joint lavage and lysis of the inflammatory fibrous tissue adhesions, which, in turn, improves joint mobility and reduces pain and closed lock. Recently, approaches for intra-articular injections have been proposed as adjuvant or replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the most efficient technique of arthrocentesis. A systematic search based on PRISMA guidelines, including a computer search with specific keywords, a reference list search and a manual search, was performed. Relevant articles were selected after three search rounds for final review. The studies pulled for the analysis presented information about the relevant predictors, including the technique of arthrocentesis (single- or two-needle method), fluid used for lavage (Ringer lactate or saline), volume of the fluid, application of the injectable, number of interventions, pain (VAS) and mouth opening scores (MMO) and follow-up. All cohorts showed improvement in mouth opening, but significant pain reduction was observed only in cohorts treated either by arthrocentesis alone or arthrocentesis followed by intra-articular injectables. Intra-articular injectables used alone failed to reduce pain post-operatively when compared to other cohorts. We concluded that both double-needle and single-puncture arthrocentesis techniques are equally efficient. Application of the adjuvant injectable did not improve the outcomes of arthrocentesis performed alone. The volume of the fluid used for joint lavage and its chemical composition were not significant in clinical outcomes. However, due to the lack of homogeneity in the study settings, a meta-analysis could not be applied and a systematic review was conducted. We still, however, state that there is a knowledge gap in the current literature regarding the use of injectables alone, as well as a longitudinal follow-up, which provides information about treatment efficiency. More high-quality and randomized controlled trials are required to shed light on this subject.

Suprafoveal condylar arthroplasty in unilateral disc displacement without reduction - A retrospective study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of suprafoveal condylar arthroplasty (SFCA) in the management of patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction (DDWoR). A retrospective study comprising patients who underwent unilateral SFCA for clinically and radiologically confirmed unilateral DDWoR from 2008 to 2020 was conducted. Patients older than 18 years at the time of diagnosis with a minimum of 6 months of unsuccessful non-surgical and minimally invasive management (including diet and life style modification, physiotherapy, appliance therapy, pharmacotherapy, arthrocentesis and arthroscopic lysis and lavage) before undergoing surgery with a minimum of 1 year follow-up post-surgery were included in the study. Patients with other articular and extra-articular causes of restricted mouth opening, prior history of mandibular surgery and/or trauma, growth abnormalities, systemic, metabolic, infective, neoplastic conditions affecting TMJ, including gross occlusal disharmony, untreated existing para-functional habits and bilateral DDWoR, were excluded from the study. Patients were assessed in terms pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), interincisal mouth opening (MO) and subjective assessment of mandibular range of movements including deviation of mouth opening, protrusion and ability for contralateral laterotrusion. 23 patients (10 males and 13 female) were included in the study, with a mean age of 35.09 years and mean follow up period of 37.7 months (range = 12-58; SD = 15.3). The mean pain scores on the VAS reduced from 6.35 preoperatively to 1.13 postoperatively and were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The improvement of the mean pre-operative mouth opening of 21.83 mm to a mean post-operative mouth opening of 42.09 mm was also found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The subjective improvement in protrusive (p = 0.0003), laterotrusive (p = 0.0005) and opening movements (p = 0.0001) after 1 year were also found to be statistically significant. No patient developed any significant changes in occlusion post-operatively. Four of 23 (17.3%) patients developed transient neuromotor deficit of the temporal branch of the facial nerve. Within the limitations of the study, it seems that SFCA (without addressing the disc) might be an alternative to less invasive treatment approaches, if the latter turned out not to be successful.

Eminectomía bilateral como tratamiento para luxación crónica de articulación temporomandibular. Reporte de caso

Introducción: la luxación de la articulación temporomandibular es un desplazamiento del cóndilo fuera de sus posiciones funcionales dentro de la fosa articular y la eminencia articular, la cual ocasiona una pérdida completa de la función articular. La luxación crónica es toda luxación aguda que progresa sin un tratamiento específico y que puede ser de carácter recurrente. La eminectomía es un tratamiento quirúrgico definitivo contra la luxación crónica de articulación temporomandibular. Objetivo: reportar el caso clínico de un paciente masculino, de la tercera década de su vida, con diagnóstico de luxación crónica de la articulación temporomandibular de cinco meses de evolución y presentar una revisión actualizada de la literatura sobre este procedimiento quirúrgico. Caso clínico: el paciente fue tratado quirúrgicamente con eminectomía bilateral. Discusión: la eminectomía es un procedimiento quirúrgico controversial; sin embargo, recientes investigaciones lo catalogan como seguro y efectivo. Conclusión: el caso clínico presentado muestra un buen resultado.