Management of the Nasal Deformity in the Unilateral Cleft of the Lip and Nose

Rhinoplasty Exclusively Utilizing Autologous Costal Cartilage for Patients with Prior Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Background

Rhinoplasty in patients with previous unilateral cleft lip repair is a surgical challenge due to complex nasal deformities, including a horizontally positioned nasal wing, wide cleft side nostrils, nasal base defects, and a short and deviated nasal columella. To comprehensively address these complexities, we exclusively utilized autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty procedures, using various surgical techniques.

Methods

This study presents a comprehensive case series of 39 patients who had previously undergone unilateral cleft lip surgery but still had nasal deformities. Rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage was performed at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam. Costal cartilage was partially crushed and then finely cut to shape the dorsal area and raise the nasal base on the cleft side. Partially crushed cartilage was also used to shape shield grafts, cap grafts, and alar batten grafts, whereas sliced cartilage was utilized for septal extension grafts. Evaluation was based on improvements in anthropometric indicators, patient satisfaction using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale and FACE-Q scores.

Results

The average age of patients was 25.13 years. All postoperative anthropometric indicators showed significant improvements. Postsurgery, the total ROE score was three times higher than before surgery (P < 0.001), and the total FACE-Q score was 2.26 times higher (P < 0.001). No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusions

This procedure effectively addresses complex nasal deformities in patients with prior unilateral cleft lip repair, emphasizing the value of autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty for such individuals.

The Fisher Subunit Anatomical Approach for Cleft Lip Revisions: An Evolution and Case Series

ABSTRACT

Many techniques exist to reapproximate a cleft lip but can leave unsatisfactory results with nonanatomic scars and a short upper lip, creating a need for revision. Many revisions focus on adjacent tissue transfers and realignment of landmarks, but in the senior authors' experience, recreating the defect and utilizing the Fisher repair for revision have led to aesthetically pleasing results and less noticeable scars. A database was collected that included all cleft lip revisions performed at a large, comprehensive children's hospital from October 2018 to July 2021. Inclusion criteria included any cleft patient with a cleft lip revision performed by two craniofacial surgeons. Data collected included sex, characteristics of the cleft lip, age at initial and index repair, type of initial repair, previous revisions, type of revision with any additional tissue rearrangement, and any nose repair. Sixty-five patients were included in the study for analysis. The type of initial repair was known in sixty-four cases (98%), and fifty-four were Millard repairs (83%). Twenty-two patients (33%) had a previous revision prior to their index revision. Sixty patients (92%) underwent the Fisher repair technique for their index revision and forty-six patients (70%) underwent nasal revision. In follow-up, all patients demonstrated an improvement in lip aesthetics. This study demonstrates a large subset of patients that have undergone cleft lip revision using the Fisher technique. In the senior surgeons' experience, the Fisher repair technique in the setting of cleft lip revision is an ideal way to address the shortcomings of historical repair techniques.

A New Algorithm for Secondary Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

OBJECTIVES

Following primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip palate (UCLP), cleft lip nasal deformities (CLNDs) (nasal asymmetry, collapsed nasal alae, and a widened alar base) are generally inevitable and often require secondary rhinoplasty. However, reconstructing a cleft nose with an alar tissue deficiency remains challenging for rhinoplasty surgeons.

METHODS

The manifestations of common deformities are described herein, and a secondary rhinoplasty technique for unilateral CLNDs using a nasolabial flap (NLF) has been proposed for patients with alar tissue deficiency. Secondary rhinoplasties were performed in 12 patients with unilateral CLNDs between 2020 and 2021 using a NLF. Photogrammetric measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 12 flaps were successfully transferred. Ten patients were followed up for >1 year.

RESULTS

Significant postoperative decreases in nasal alar width were measured in both the base view (p < 0.050) and the frontal view (p < 0.050). Despite the additional facial scars that occurred in some cases, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The NLF achieved satisfactory results in secondary rhinoplasty of unilateral CLND for patients with nasal tissue deficiencies in whom the surgeon weighed the potential benefits over postoperative scarring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:1648-1655, 2024.

Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty remains a challenging operation that requires an understanding of the aberrant anatomy in cleft lip nasal deformity as well as the ability to adapt various techniques suited to the needs of each patient. In this article, we review some of the classically described approaches in cleft rhinoplasty and different strategies to address the nasal subunits. Presurgical adjuncts, surgical interventions before facial skeletal maturity, and patient reported outcome measures are also discussed.

An essential overview of orofacial clefting

An appreciation of the embryologic development of the face is essential to understanding the anatomic variation observed in this phenotypically broad condition. Embryologically, the nose, lip and palate are separated into the primary and secondary palate, which are divided anatomically by the incisive foramen. The epidemiology of orofacial clefting is reviewed together with the contemporaneous cleft classification systems that enable comparisons to be made between international centres for audit and research purposes. A detailed examination of the clinical anatomy of the lip and palate informs the surgical priorities for the primary reconstruction of both form and function. The pathophysiology of the submucous cleft palate is also explored. The seismic impact of the 1998 Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on the organisation of UK cleft care provision is outlined. The importance of the Cleft Registry and Audit Network database in auditing UK cleft outcomes is highlighted. The potential for the Cleft Collective study to establish the causes of clefting, the optimal treatment protocols, and the impact of cleft on patients is tremendously exciting for all health care professionals involved in the management of this challenging congenital deformity.

Cleft Rhinoplasty: Does Timing and Utilization of Cartilage Grafts Affect Perioperative Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and perioperative complications of different reconstructive strategies to correct cleft nasal deformity, with particular attention paid to type and timing of cartilage grafting.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted of cleft rhinoplasty performed between 2012 and 2017 in North America utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program- Pediatric hospital network. Medical/surgical complications, reoperations, and readmissions within 30 days postoperatively were analyzed with appropriate statistics.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 3317 pediatric patients underwent cleft rhinoplasty, with 8.0% involving the use of cartilage grafts. Ear cartilage was significantly more commonly used for intermediate repair, whereas rib cartilage was more commonly used for late repair (P=0.006). Overall, rhinoplasties with ear cartilage grafts had shorter procedure durations than those without cartilage grafts (P=0.005), whereas those with rib cartilage grafts had increased procedure duration (P<0.001). The use of cartilage grafts was not associated with increased complications in either intermediate or late cleft rhinoplasty. Patients with bilateral clefts were more likely to undergo rhinoplasty with cartilage grafts overall (P=0.047) and with cartilage grafts for late reconstruction (P=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Ear cartilage is most frequently utilized for intermediate repair, whereas rib cartilage is most frequently utilized for late repair during cleft rhinoplasty. Ear cartilage grafts are associated with significantly decreased procedure duration, whereas rib cartilage grafts are associated with significantly increased procedure duration. Not surprisingly, cleft rhinoplasty is relatively safe, with a 2% overall short-term complication rate.

Surgical design and application of alar cartilage positioning and repositioning in correcting cleft lip nose deformity

Correction of nasal deformity is integral to modern cleft lip repair, and high risk of postoperative relapse remains a technical hurdle to overcome. The authors previously presented internal fixation of alar cartilage based on Chinese nasal morphology and lateral columella tissue increment for the correction of unilateral cleft nose deformity. Through the application and review of these techniques, the authors developed a new technique named alar cartilage positioning for primary cleft nose correction, or alar cartilage repositioning for secondary cases. Here, we introduce the theoretical foundation and preliminary experience in using this new technique.

Anterior Nasal Spine Relocation With Cleft Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

In unilateral cleft nasal deformity, the skeletal, and cartilaginous framework of nose is deformed. The anterior nasal spine (ANS) is usually displaced to the non-cleft-side. In cleft orthognathic surgery, ANS relocation can help correct the deviated ANS and nasal septum and might lead to an improved esthetic and functional outcome.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral cleft lip who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery between July 2016 and July 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. During conventional two-jaw orthognathic surgery, the ANS was separated from the maxilla. The separated ANS with the attached septum was fixed on the maxillary midline by wiring. Computed tomography scan was used to measure the septal deviation angle and septal deviation from the midline.

RESULTS

The septal deviation from the maxillary midline decreased following surgery (preoperative versus postoperative: 4.6 ± 1.0 mm versus 3.2 ± 1.2 mm; P = 0.016). The coronal septal deviation angle was widened after ANS relocation, although the transverse septal deviation angle remained unchanged (coronal septal deviation angle, preoperative versus postoperative: 146.7 ± 12.6 versus 159.8 ± 7.6; P = 0.01; transverse septal deviation angle, preoperative versus postoperative: 156.5 ± 11.7 versus 162.8 ± 7.7; P = 0.128).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that simultaneous ANS relocation with orthognathic surgery is a viable option for cleft-related deformities, considering the resultant caudal septum straightening and stable structural support observed in the long-term.

Thermographic analysis of postoperative changes in the nasal breathing efficiency in infants and young children with unilateral cleft lip

PURPOSE

Nowadays, cheilorhinoseptoplasty is one of the most efficient methods of cleft lip primary surgical treatment eliminating both functional and esthetic issues. In this work, we have proposed, developed, and experimentally tested a new thermography-based algorithm for studying the efficiency and symmetry of nasal breathing prior to and after the surgery.

METHODS

To investigate and analyze the external respiration function of an infant with unilateral cleft lip after surgical respiration symmetry restoration followed by anatomically shaped postoperative endonasal retainer installation, we have applied contactless thermal imaging in real time.

RESULTS

The developed algorithm enables effective analysis of the respiratory function in infants before and after the surgery. Its combination with applied surgical technique experimentally demonstrated the potential of this approach for improving further the efficiency and symmetry of the airflows through the patient's nasal passages after the primary cheilorhinoseptoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study constitute a novel and promising avenue of investigation into the breathing function in infants and young children prior to and after their surgery for unilateral cleft lip. The adaptation of our technique to the conditions of a pediatric hospital will make it a safe and informative tool for noninvasive diagnosing the respiratory function in infants in the early postoperative period.