Infliximab in patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: Indian experience

Maintaining infliximab induced clinical remission with azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylates in acute severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis has lower cost and high efficacy (MIRACLE): a multicenter study

Background/Aims

Infliximab (IFX) has been used to induce and maintain remission in patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Long-term use of biologics in developing countries is limited by high cost and frequent side effects. An optimal maintenance strategy in these patients needs to be established.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of maintenance of clinical remission with combination of azathioprine (AZA) and 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) in patients with severe steroid-refractory UC where IFX (5 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6) had been used only as an induction therapy was done at 2 centers in India. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining corticosteroid-free sustained clinical remission (SCR) at the end of study period. Rates of relapse and cost of therapy were also analyzed.

Results

Of the 137 patients who received rescue IFX induction therapy, 77 (56.2%) achieved clinical remission (mean age 34.81 ± 13.32 years, 68.83% males, median follow-up 4 years, range 3 months to 6 years) and were included. Cumulative corticosteroid-free SCR was maintained in 68%, 59%, 42%, and 35% patients at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years respectively. Sixty-seven relapses were observed in 33 patients. Majority of the relapses (45/67, 67.16%) occurred within first 2 years of follow-up. Two relapses were managed with re-induction with IFX, one required colectomy, whereas all other responded to repeat course(s) of corticosteroids. Annual per capita maintenance therapy with 5-ASA and AZA was cheaper by US$ 4,526 compared to maintaining remission with IFX.

Conclusions

Clinical remission achieved with IFX induction therapy in severe steroid-refractory UC can be sustained over long time with a combination of AZA and 5-ASA.

Relapse rate following withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A real-life cohort from northern India

BACKGROUND

The decision to withdraw anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial, especially in the developing world, where its long-term use is restrained by side effects and prohibitive cost. Present study evaluated the relapse rate and its predictors following anti-TNF withdrawal in a cohort of IBD patients from northern India.

METHODS

Patients with IBD who received anti-TNF therapy (induction and beyond), and were under follow-up at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, from January 2005 to July 2018 were included. Demographic features, disease characteristics, duration, response to anti-TNF therapy, and relapse rate after its withdrawal were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 4600 patients with IBD under follow-up, 90 (1.9%) received anti-TNF therapy, of whom 11 were excluded (8-complete records unavailable; 3-received only single dose). Of 79 patients (mean age-40.1 ± 14.2 years; 53.2% males; 31 [39.2%] ulcerative colitis, 47 [59.5%] Crohn's disease; median follow-up-24 [12-39] months), 9 (11.4%) were primary non-responders, 19 (24.1%) had secondary loss of response, and 51 (64.5%) maintained clinical response on anti-TNF. Anti-TNF was withdrawn in 45 (57%) patients (major causes: financial burden-16.5%; tubercular reactivation-12.7%), of whom 33 were in clinical remission. Over a median follow-up of 26 (7.5-45) months, 15 patients (45.5%) relapsed. Most of them responded to antibiotics, steroids, or anti-TNF agents; only 3 required surgery. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, long disease duration prior to therapy was a significant predictor of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.33, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Almost 50% patients with IBD in clinical remission relapse within a year of anti-TNF withdrawal. However, most of these patients have a favorable disease course and respond to medical therapy.

Prediction of outcome of treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis using principal component analysis and artificial intelligence

Background and Aim

About 15% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) fail to respond to medical treatment and may require colectomy. An early prediction of response may help the treating team and the patients and their family to prepare for alternative treatment options.

Methods

Data of 263 patients (mean age 37.0 ± 14.0-years, 176, 77% male) with acute severe UC admitted during a 12-year period were used to study predictors of response using univariate analysis, multivariate linear principal component analysis (PCA), and nonlinear artificial neural network (ANN).

Results

Of 263 patients, 231 (87.8%) responded to the initial medical treatment that included oral prednisolone (n = 14, 5.3%), intravenous (IV) hydrocortisone (n = 238, 90.5%), IV cyclosporine (n = 9, 3.4%), and inflixmab (n = 2, 0.7%), and 28 (10.6%) did not respond and the remaining 4 (1.5%) died, all of whom did were also nonresponders. Nonresponding patients had to stay longer in the hospital and died more often. On univariate analysis, the presence of complications, the need for use of cyclosporin, lower Hb, platelets, albumin, serum potassium, and higher C-reactive protein were predictors of nonresponse. Hb and albumin were strong predictive factors on both PCA and ANN. Though the nonlinear modeling using ANN had a good predictive accuracy for the response, its accuracy for predicting nonresponse was lower.

Conclusion

It is possible to predict the response to medical treatment in patients with UC using linear and nonlinear modeling technique. Serum albumin and Hb are strong predictive factors.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Optimal Salvage Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is an effective salvage therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis; however, the optimal dosing strategy is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of infliximab dosage and intensification on colectomy-free survival in acute severe ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Studies reporting outcomes of hospitalized steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab salvage were identified. Infliximab use was categorized by dose, dose number, and schedule. The primary outcome was colectomy-free survival at 3 months. Pooled proportions and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

RESULTS

Forty-one cohorts (n = 2158 cases) were included. Overall colectomy-free survival with infliximab salvage was 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.48% to 83.6%) at 3 months and 69.8% (95% CI, 65.7% to 73.7%) at 12 months. Colectomy-free survival at 3 months was superior with 5-mg/kg multiple (≥2) doses compared with single-dose induction (odds ratio [OR], 4.24; 95% CI, 2.44 to 7.36; P < 0.001). However, dose intensification with either high-dose or accelerated strategies was not significantly different to 5-mg/kg standard induction at 3 months (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.27; P = 0.24) despite being utilized in patients with a significantly higher mean C-reactive protein and lower albumin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In acute severe ulcerative colitis, multiple 5-mg/kg infliximab doses are superior to single-dose salvage. Dose-intensified induction outcomes were not significantly different compared to standard induction and were more often used in patients with increased disease severity, which may have confounded the results. This meta-analysis highlights the marked variability in the management of infliximab salvage therapy and the need for further studies to determine the optimal dose strategy.

High risk of tuberculosis during infliximab therapy despite tuberculosis screening in inflammatory bowel disease patients in India

Background/Aims

The data on the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation with infliximab (IFX) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from TB endemic countries, like India, is limited. The risk of TB reactivation on IFX and its predictors in patients with IBD was assessed.

Methods

This retrospective review included consecutive patients with IBD who received IFX, and were on follow-up from January 2005 to November 2017. The data was recorded on age/disease duration, indications for IFX, screening for latent tuberculosis (LTB) before IFX, response to IFX, incidence and duration when TB developed after IFX, and type of TB (pulmonary [PTB]/extra-pulmonary [EPTB]/disseminated).

Results

Of 69 patients (22 ulcerative colitis/47 Crohn's disease; mean age, 35.6±14.5 years; 50.7% males; median follow-up duration after IFX, 19 months [interquartile range, 5.5-48.7 months]), primary non-response at 8 weeks and secondary loss of response at 26 and 52 weeks were seen in 14.5%, 6% and 15% patients respectively. Prior to IFX, all patients were screened for LTB, 8 (11.6%) developed active TB (disseminated, 62.5%; EPTB, 25%; PTB, 12.5%) after a median of 19 weeks (interquartile range, 14.0-84.5 weeks) of IFX. Of these 8 patients' none had LTB, even when 7 of 8 were additionally screened with contrast-enhanced chest tomography. Though not statistically significant, more patients with Crohn's disease than ulcerative colitis (14.9% vs. 4.5%, P=0.21), and those with past history of TB (25% vs. 9.8%, P=0.21), developed TB. Age, gender, disease duration, or extraintestinal manifestations could not predict TB reactivation.

Conclusions

There is an extremely high rate of TB with IFX in Indian patients with IBD. Current screening techniques are ineffective and it is difficult to predict TB after IFX.

Efficacy and safety of the adalimumab biosimilar Exemptia as induction therapy in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Data on the efficacy and safety of the adalimumab biosimilar Exemptia are limited.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) treated at Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, India were offered cyclosporine A, biologicals or biosimilars, or surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who were treated with the adalimumab biosimilar, Exemptia. These patients were administered an induction dosing schedule of 160 mg Exemptia at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, and then 40 mg every other week from week 4 to 8. The clinical response and remission were assessed at week 8 using Mayo score.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients (62.1% male; mean age, 34.9 ± 9.7 years) with moderate-to-severe steroid-refractory active UC (mean disease duration, 6.3±5.1 years; pancolitis in 9 patients [31.1%]; left-sided colitis in 20 patients [68.9%]) were treated with the Exemptia induction dosing schedule. The mean Mayo score at presentation was 8.2±1.4. At week 8, clinical response was observed in 7 patients (24.1%), whereas clinical remission was observed only in 1 patient (3.5%). Among the non-responders (n=21), 4 patients required colectomy, 1 died, 1 was lost to follow-up, 10 were offered fecal microbiota transplant, 3 were administered infliximab, and 2 patients were administered cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively. Four patients (13.8%) developed extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The adalimumab biosimilar Exemptia has limited efficacy for the attainment of clinical response and remission in moderate-to-severe steroid-refractory UC, with a significant risk of acquisition or reactivation of tuberculosis in developing countries such as India.

Colectomy rates in patients with ulcerative colitis following treatment with infliximab or ciclosporin: a systematic literature review

This review aimed to compile all available published data on colectomy rates following treatment using infliximab or ciclosporin in adult ulcerative colitis patients and to analyse colectomy rates, timing to colectomy and postcolectomy mortality for each treatment. We systematically reviewed the literature after 1990 reporting colectomy rates in ulcerative colitis patients treated with infliximab or ciclosporin, excluding articles on paediatric patients, patients with indeterminate colitis or Crohn's disease and bowel surgery not related to ulcerative colitis. We presented weighted mean colectomy rates and mortality rates. Cox's regression was used to assess time to colectomy adjusting for colitis severity, patient age and sex. We tabulated 78 studies reporting on ciclosporin and/or infliximab and colectomy rates or postcolectomy mortality rates. Not all studies reported data in a standardized manner. Infliximab had a significantly lower colectomy rate than ciclosporin at 36 months when analysing all studies, studies directly comparing infliximab and ciclosporin and studies using severe colitis patients, but not at 3, 12 or 24 months. Severity and age were key indicators in the likelihood of undergoing colectomy after treatment. Postcolectomy mortality rates were less than 1.5% for both drugs. This review indicates that long-term colectomy rates following infliximab are significantly lower than ciclosporin in the longer term, and that postcolectomy mortality following infliximab and ciclosporin is very low. However, many key data items were missing from research articles, reducing our ability to establish with more confidence the actual impact of these two drugs on colectomy rates and postcolectomy mortality rates.