Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure in gastroesophageal reflux disease: An ignored metric in high-resolution esophageal manometry

Anatomic and Manometric Abnormalities of the Upper and Lower Esophageal Sphincters in Patients With Reflux Disease

RESEARCH QUESTION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) may cause inflammation of the laryngeal and pharyngeal mucosa. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) involves retrograde flow of gastric content into the esophagus below the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). The goal of this study was to investigate the esophageal anatomical and manometric variations of the esophagus in patients with LPR and/or GERD.

METHODS

Adult voice center patients who underwent diagnostic workup for reflux complaints with 24-hour multichannel intraluminal pH-impedance testing and esophageal manometry were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were classified as having LPR (>10 proximal reflux events), LPR + GERD (>10 proximal reflux events plus >73 distal reflux events) or were assigned to a control group (≤10 proximal events and ≤73 distal reflux events) based on pH study results. Anatomic and manometric parameters were evaluated between groups.

RESULTS

There were 169 cases (65 male, 104 female) included in this study. The average age was 50.50 ± 17.29. Subjects in the LPR group had significantly higher UES relaxation pressures and greater UES length compared with the control group. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the control group compared with the LPR group or the GERD + LPR group. Subjects in the GERD + LPR group had a significantly shorter intra-abdominal portion of the lower esophageal sphincter compared with the LPR only group and the control group. Intrabolus pressure was significantly lower in both the LPR group and the LPR + GERD group compared with the control group. Distal wave amplitude was significantly lower in the LPR + GERD group compared to both the LPR group and the control group. The percentage of swallows with incomplete clearance was significantly greater in the LPR + GERD group than both the control group and the LPR group. The LPR group had significantly fewer swallows with incomplete clearance than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic and manometric abnormalities are present in subjects with LPR with or without GERD and may contribute to the pathogenesis of reflux disease. Further research is needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Acupuncture Improved the Function of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Motility in Chinese Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Randomized Trial

Objectives

Acupuncture is therapeutic for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease by an unclear mechanism. This study was aimed at investigating the effect of acupuncture on esophageal motility in patients with symptoms of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms were prospectively enrolled from August 2014 to December 2018 and randomized into acupuncture and control groups (n = 33 and 35, respectively). The acupuncture group received acupuncture, and the control group received sham acupuncture. Pre- and post-acupuncture high-resolution manometry was performed to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on esophageal motility. The GerdQ questionnaire was used to evaluate the pre- and post-intervention symptoms.

Results

After acupuncture, there was a significant increase in the length of lower esophageal sphincter (3.10 ± 1.08 cm vs. 3.78 ± 1.01 cm), length of intra-abdominal lower esophageal sphincter (2.14 ± 1.05 cm vs. 2.75 ± 1.16 cm), and mean basal pressure of lower esophageal sphincter (22.02 ± 10.03 mmHg vs. 25.06 ± 11.48 mmHg) in the acupuncture group (P = 0.014); moreover, the numbers of fragmented contraction and ineffective contraction decreased from 36 to 12 (P < 0.001) and 43 to 18 (P = 0.001), respectively, in the acupuncture group. However, no significant difference was observed in the control group. The GerdQ score decreased significantly from 9.45 ± 2.44 to 7.82 ± 2.21 points in the first week after acupuncture (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Acupuncture, which improves esophageal motility, has short-term efficacy in patients with symptoms of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. This trial is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019646).

Concise Review: Applicability of High-resolution Manometry in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Manometry, particularly high-resolution manometry is the preferred diagnostic tool used to evaluate esophageal motor function. This investigation is strongly indicated in the setting of dysphagia, but is also useful in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially in case of failure of conventional treatment to exclude alternative diagnoses and prior to anti-reflux surgery. Moreover, ineffective esophagogastric junction barrier function and esophageal motor dysfunction are pathophysiological mechanisms in GERD and can be identified by manometry. The recent international guidelines have positioned high-resolution manometry as an important part of functional diagnostic work up in GERD in order to identify the GERD phenotype to guide specific treatment. The proposed manometric identification and measurement is based on the Chicago classification version 4.0 adding with new established metrics for GERD evaluation.

Association between endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) and high-resolution manometry

Background and study aims  The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS), a novel diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), allows evaluation of the anti-reflux barrier using endoscopy by monitoring the intragastric pressure (IGP) during insufflation. In this study, we evaluated the association between EPSIS results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function measured by high-resolution manometry (HRM) to elucidate whether EPSIS can evaluate the LES function. Patients and methods  A retrospective, single-center study of patients with GERD symptoms who underwent endoscopy, pH-impedance monitoring, EPSIS, and HRM was conducted. The primary outcome was basal LES pressure and the secondary outcomes were end-respiratory LES pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). As EPSIS parameters, the following were measured: 1) pressure difference (mmHg), the difference between maximum and basal IGP; and 2) pressure gradient (mmHg/s), calculated by dividing pressure difference by the insufflating time. Pressure difference < 4.7 mmHg or pressure gradient < 0.07 mmHg/s was defined as an EPSIS GERD pattern. Results  Forty-seven patients (median age: 53 years, 37 female) were analyzed. Pressure difference and pressure gradient significantly correlated with basal LES pressure (ρ = 0.29; P =  0.04 and ρ = 0.29; P =  0.04). Patients with EPSIS GERD pattern showed significantly lower basal LES pressure [13.2 (4.8-26.6) vs 25.3 (10.4-66.7) mmHg, P =  0.002], lower end-respiratory LES pressure [8.5 (1.1-15.9) vs 15.5 (1.9-43.9) mmHg, P =  0.019] and lower IRP [5.9 (1.0-12.0) vs 9.8 (1.3-17.8) mmHg, P =  0.020]. Conclusions  This study showed a close association between EPSIS results and LES pressures measured by HRM. This indicates that EPSIS can evaluate the LES function during endoscopy and endorse the role of EPSIS as a diagnostic tool for GERD.

Ineffective esophageal motility assessment in patients with and without pathological esophageal acid reflux

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), defined as minor esophageal motility disorder, is also the most common esophageal motility disorder. The relationship between gastro-esophageal reflux disease is still controversial. Our aim in this study is to evaluate whether there are differences in terms of demographic, endoscopic, or motility findings between IEM patients with pathological esophageal acid reflux and physiological reflux.Patients diagnosed with IEM according to the Chicago classification v3 with high-resolution manometry (HRM) before acid monitoring constituted the study group of our investigation. The patients were divided into 2 groups as patients with pathological esophageal reflux and patients with physiological reflux according to 24-hour acid monitoring. Demographic data, endoscopic findings, and HRM findings were compared between 2 groups.A total of 62 patients who were diagnosed with IEM according to the Chicago classification v3 were included in the study. Patients in the physiological reflux group were 7 years younger on average than the pathological reflux group. Esophagitis rates were significantly higher in the pathological reflux group (P = .033). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, integrated relaxation pressure, and the presence of hernia were found to be similar in the 2 groups (P = 392, P = 182, P = 657, respectively). The rate of severe IEM was also similar between the 2 groups (P = .143).The fact that the physiological reflux patient group is younger may suggest that the IEM develops in the early period and then reflux accompanies the picture with advancing age.

Mosapride Improves Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Body Function in Patients With Minor Disorders of Esophageal Peristalsis

Background/Aims

High-resolution manometry (HRM) has broadened the awareness of minor esophageal peristaltic disorders. However, the treatments for these minor disorders are limited and the role of prokinetics has been controversial. This study evaluates the effect of mosapride in patients with minor peristaltic disorders.

Methods

This study prospectively enrolled 21 patients with esophageal symptoms who were diagnosed with minor peristaltic disorders by gastroscopy and HRM using the Chicago classification version 3.0. Patients received mosapride 30 mg daily for 2 weeks. Symptoms were assessed using the abbreviated World Health Organization quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and a HRM study was performed before and after 2 weeks of treatment.

Results

HRM metrics of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) respiratory mean pressure (median 14.6 mmHg vs 17.3 mmHg; interquartile range [IQR] 8.7-22.5 mmHg vs 12.5-25.9 mmHg; P = 0.004) and distal contractile integral (median 343.8 mmHg·sec·cm vs 698.1 mmHg·sec·cm; IQR 286.5-795.9 mmHg·sec·cm vs 361.0-1127.6 mmHg·sec·cm; P = 0.048) were significantly increased after treatment. Complete response (≥ 80.0%), satisfactory response (≥ 50.0%), partial response (< 50.0%), and refractory response rates were 19.0%, 52.4%, 14.3%, and 14.3%, respectively. However, there was no statistical difference in all WHOQOL-BREF scores before and after treatment. Univariate analysis showed LES respiratory mean pressure (P = 0.036) was associated with symptom improvement (complete + satisfactory group). However, no statistical difference was found in other factors after multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Mosapride improved esophageal symptoms and significantly increased LES respiratory mean pressure and distal contractile integral. Therefore, mosapride could enhance LES and esophageal body contraction pressures in patients with minor peristaltic disorders.

Indian consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: A position statement of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Society of Gastroenterology developed this evidence-based practice guideline for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in adults. A modified Delphi process was used to develop this consensus containing 58 statements, which were generated by electronic voting iteration as well as face-to-face meeting and review of the supporting literature primarily from India. These statements include 10 on epidemiology, 8 on clinical presentation, 10 on investigations, 23 on treatment (including medical, endoscopic, and surgical modalities), and 7 on complications of GERD. When the proportion of those who voted either to accept completely or with minor reservation was 80% or higher, the statement was regarded as accepted. The prevalence of GERD in India ranges from 7.6% to 30%, being  < 10% in most population studies, and higher in cohort studies. The dietary factors associated with GERD include use of spices and non-vegetarian food. Helicobacter pylori is thought to have a negative relation with GERD; H. pylori negative patients have higher grade of symptoms of GERD and esophagitis. Less than 10% of GERD patients in India have erosive esophagitis. In patients with occasional or mild symptoms, antacids and histamine H₂ receptor blockers (H2RAs) may be used, and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) should be used in patients with frequent or severe symptoms. Prokinetics have limited proven role in management of GERD.