Eosinophilic gastroenteritis presenting as achalasia cardia and responding to botulinum injection and therapy directed against eosinophilic esophagitis

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Are We Missing in Our Busy Endoscopy Practice?

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) form a significant part of a busy endoscopist's practice. Endoscopy plays an all-encompassing role in the diagnosis and management of EMDs including achalasia cardia. The focus on in-vogue third-space endoscopic procedures such as per-oral endoscopic myotomy often digresses the important role of endoscopy. Endoscopic evaluation forms the part of standard first-line evaluation of any dysphagia and serves to rule out a secondary cause such as an esophagogastric junction malignancy and eosinophilic esophagitis. Moreover, endoscopic evaluation may itself provide corroborative evidence that may contribute to the diagnosis of the motility disorder. Achalasia cardia may present with a wide spectrum of endoscopic findings from being entirely normal and the well-known and pathognomonic dilated sigmoid-shaped esophagus with food residue, to lesser-known ornate signs. The evidence on the role of endosonography in EMDs is conflicting and largely restricted to evaluation of pseudoachalasia. High-resolution manometry (HRM) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of EMDs. Endoscopists must also keep abreast of the latest iteration of the Chicago classification version 4.0, which differs significantly from its predecessor in being more stringent in making diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and disorders of peristalsis since these manometric findings may be seen in normal individuals and may be mimicked by opioid use and gastroesophageal reflux. The latest rendition also includes the use of provocative maneuvers and testing in both supine and sitting posture. Despite being the gold standard, there are certain lacunae in the use and interpretation of the Chicago classification of which the users should be well aware. Emerging technologies such as functional lumen imaging probe and planimetry, and timed barium esophagogram fill the lacuna in diagnosis of these motility disorders, which at times is beyond the resolution of HRM.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Clinical characteristics and management

There is paucity of published data related to eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE). We aimed to study the clinical characteristics, management, and follow-up of EGE. From March 2014 to December 2018, patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms suspected to have EGE were investigated. This is a retrospective study. Complete blood count, upper GI endoscopy (UGIE), and biopsy were done. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) abdomen was done when intestinal obstruction was suspected. Laparoscopic small bowel resection or stricturoplasty and full-thickness biopsy were obtained. EGE was diagnosed if the biopsies showed eosinophilic infiltration of one or more regions of the GI tract (> 30 eosinophils per high power field [HPF]). Patients were treated with immunosuppressive therapy and if indicated surgery. Clinical response to therapy was assessed and patients were followed up for 1 year. Forty-one patients (mean age 34.8 years, median age 32, range 25-70 years, 29 males) had EGE. Upper abdominal pain was the most common symptom. Peripheral eosinophilia was present in 82.9% patients. On UGIE, duodenal lesions were observed in 75% patients. EGE was confirmed in 37 patients by endoscopic duodenal biopsies, in 2 patients by jejunal mucosal biopsies using enteroscopy, and in 2 patients by full thickness surgical biopsies. Forty-one patients were treated with oral corticosteroids inclusive of 4 patients who underwent surgery. Of the 37 patients, 6 were lost to follow-up; 31 patients were followed up for a period of 1 year. All the patients who were treated with corticosteroids responded to initial therapy. Over a follow-up period one case had frequent relapses. EGE should be suspected in patients with upper abdominal pain. Peripheral eosinophilia occurs in the majority. Tissue diagnosis showing eosinophilic infiltration is diagnostic. Oral corticosteroid therapy is highly effective and relapse is rare.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Achalasia: Two Distinct Nosologic Entities or a Possible Etiopathogenic Association?

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that researchers have made significant progress in elucidating the pathophysiology of esophageal diseases, the understanding of esophageal motility alterations in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is in its infancy and current published medical literature remains rather scarce on this topic. A growing body of scientific data regarding associations between esophageal motor disorders, such as achalasia and EoE, exists nowadays.

SUMMARY

It seems that the association of EoE and achalasia does not constitute a cause and effect relationship, as it is not clear whether esophageal motility abnormalities are the result of EoE or vice versa. As such, there is no universally accepted treatment algorithm for patients presenting with both of these entities. Key Messages: The aim of this article is to review the existing data on achalasia-like motility disorders in patients with EoE, highlighting a possible association between these 2 esophageal disorders. Moreover, we seek to describe the clinical presentation in such cases, diagnostic modalities to be used, and current treatment strategies in patients suspected to suffer from both disorders.

Primary eosinophilic gastroenteritis: A case series from western India

Primary eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a rare inflammatory disorder of gastrointestinal tract characterized by symptoms like abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, weight loss, and eosinophilic infiltration of the intestinal wall with or without peripheral eosinophilia. We found four cases with different causes of eosinophilic enteritis with varying manifestations ranging from chronic diarrhea with malabsorption, dysphagia, and gastric outlet obstruction due to mass-like lesions.