1
|
Shete M, Kocher M, Pratt R, Lee H, Zierhut H. Genetic counseling processes and strategies for racially and ethnically diverse populations: A systematic review. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 37743585 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Genetic counseling outcomes are influenced by the processes and strategies used by counselors, yet little is known about how these strategies directly impact patients and populations. In particular, tailoring genetic counseling consultations to best meet the needs of cultural, racial, and ethnically diverse populations has been explored. This review aims to identify genetic counseling strategies tailored for a diversity of racial and ethnic populations with the goal to find ways to improve genetic counseling outcomes. Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases were searched for original research articles published in English that employed genetic counseling processes and strategies to improve genetic counseling outcomes, specifically for participants from ethnically or racially diverse populations. A review of 5300 titles and abstracts resulted in the identification of 36 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Three themes emerged: (1) community involvement in culturally tailoring genetic counseling, (2) creation and use of culturally tailored resources, and (3) modifications to the genetic counseling process. The effectiveness of genetic counseling strategies could not be evaluated due to lack of consistent outcome measures in the articles. The involvement of diverse ethnic and racial populations in developing inclusive genetic counseling tools and practices will help the profession provide better patient care in the future. More research connecting genetic counseling processes and outcomes will help to assess how well these modified approaches meet the needs of diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrunmayee Shete
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Megan Kocher
- University Libraries, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rebekah Pratt
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Heewon Lee
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kohut K, Morton K, Turner L, Shepherd J, Fenerty V, Woods L, Grimmett C, Eccles DM, Foster C. Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1092816. [PMID: 37395995 PMCID: PMC10311450 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision support resources in this context, and the impact on decision-making outcomes. Methods Systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies involving adults with or without cancer who used a decision support resource pre- or post-genetic test for any cancer susceptibility. To gather a broad view of existing resources and gaps for development, digital or paper-based patient resources were included and not limited to decision aids. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise patient impact and experience. Results Thirty-six publications describing 27 resources were included. Heterogeneity of resources and outcome measurements highlighted the multiple modes of resource delivery and personal tailoring acceptable to and valued by patients. Impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes was mixed, but mainly positive. Findings suggested clear potential for quality patient-facing resources to be acceptable and useful. Conclusions Decision support resources about genetic cancer susceptibility are likely useful to support decision-making, but should be co-designed with patients according to evidence-based frameworks. More research is needed to study impact and outcomes, particularly in terms of longer term follow-up to identify whether patients follow through on decisions and whether any increased distress is transient. Innovative, streamlined resources are needed to scale up delivery of genetic cancer susceptibility testing for patients with cancer in mainstream oncology clinics. Tailored patient-facing decision aids should also be made available to patients identified as carriers of a pathogenic gene variant that increases future cancer risks, to complement traditional genetic counselling. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020220460, identifier: CRD42020220460.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Kohut
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Morton
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Turner
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Shepherd
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Vicky Fenerty
- Engagement Services, University of Southampton Library, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lois Woods
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dibble KE, Connor AE. Residential Locale Is Associated with Disparities in Genetic Testing-Related Outcomes Among BRCA1/2-Positive Women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:718-729. [PMID: 35178668 PMCID: PMC8853067 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01259-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While research on hereditary genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations continues to emerge, there remain unanswered questions regarding access to testing and cancer-related care. Our study determined the associations between race/ethnicity, residential locale, and genetic testing provider and related outcomes among US women with BRCA1/2 genetic mutations. METHODS One hundred ninety-three BRCA1/2-positive women from vulnerable health backgrounds were recruited via private national Facebook BRCA1/2-oriented support groups and completed an online survey. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression for the associations between race/ethnicity, residential locale, and genetic testing-related outcomes. RESULTS Women ranged in age (18-75, M = 39.5, SD = 10.7), and most were non-Hispanic white (66.3%) and lived in a suburban locale (54.9%). Women living in suburban areas were significantly less likely (aOR, .369, 95% CI, .177-.771) to receive behavioral referrals after genetic testing compared to those living in an urban locale. Women living in rural areas and suburban areas were 4.72 times more likely (95% CI, 1.48-15.1, p = .009) and 2.61 times more likely (95% CI, 1.05-6.48, p = .038), respectively, to receive genetic testing from a primary care provider versus private genetic testing office/hospital compared to women in urban locales. Associations between race/ethnicity and genetic testing outcomes were not statistically significant. Residential locale did not predict the odds of undergoing surgery for risk reduction or surveillance for early detection. CONCLUSION Our study identifies disparities in genetic testing resources among women living in suburban and rural areas. These findings can be used to inform future care, research, and community resources that may impact services relating to genetic testing within these locales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate E Dibble
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Avonne E Connor
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tiller JM, Cousens NE, Kaur R, Rowley S, Ko YA, Mahale S, Bankier A, Meiser B, Barlow-Stewart K, Burnett L, Jacobs C, James P, Trainer A, Neil S, Campbell IG, Andrews L, Delatycki M. Population-based BRCA1/2 testing programmes are highly acceptable in the Jewish community: results of the JeneScreen Study. J Med Genet 2023; 60:265-273. [PMID: 36763037 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2022-108519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) people have a higher incidence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) than unselected populations. Three BRCA-Jewish founder mutations (B-JFMs) comprise >90% of BRCA1/2 PVs in AJ people. Personal/family cancer history-based testing misses ≥50% of people with B-JFM. METHODS We compared two population-based B-JFM screening programmes in Australia-using (1) an online tool (Sydney) and (2) in-person group sessions (Melbourne). RESULTS Of 2167 Jewish people tested (Sydney n=594; Melbourne n=1573), 1.3% (n=28) have a B-JFM, only 2 of whom had a significant cancer family history (Manchester score ≥12). Pretest anxiety scores were normal (mean 9.9±3.5 (6-24)), with no significant post-result change (9.5±3.3). Decisional regret (mean 7.4±13.0 (0-100)), test-related distress (mean 0.8+/2.2 (0-30)) and positive experiences (reverse-scored) (mean 3.4±4.5 (1-20)) scores were low, with no significant differences between Sydney and Melbourne participants. Post-education knowledge was good overall (mean 11.8/15 (±2.9)) and significantly higher in Melbourne than Sydney. Post-result knowledge was the same (mean 11.7 (±2.4) vs 11.2 (±2.4)). Participants with a B-JFM had higher post-result anxiety and test-related distress and lower positive experiences, than those without a B-JFM, but scores were within the normal range. Family cancer history did not significantly affect knowledge or anxiety, or pretest perception of B-JFM or cancer risks. Most participants (93%) were satisfied/very satisfied with the programme. CONCLUSION Both B-JFM screening programmes are highly acceptable to Australian Jewish communities. The programme enabled identification of several individuals who were previously unaware they have a B-JFM, many of whom would have been ineligible for current criteria-based testing in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Tiller
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole E Cousens
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simone Rowley
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yi-An Ko
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sakshi Mahale
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Agnes Bankier
- Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Leslie Burnett
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Andrews
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Delatycki
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia .,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pfeffer G, Lee G, Pontifex CS, Fanganiello RD, Peck A, Weihl CC, Kimonis V. Multisystem Proteinopathy Due to VCP Mutations: A Review of Clinical Heterogeneity and Genetic Diagnosis. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13060963. [PMID: 35741724 PMCID: PMC9222868 DOI: 10.3390/genes13060963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this work, we review clinical features and genetic diagnosis of diseases caused by mutations in the gene encoding valosin-containing protein (VCP/p97), the functionally diverse AAA-ATPase. VCP is crucial to a multitude of cellular functions including protein quality control, stress granule formation and clearance, and genomic integrity functions, among others. Pathogenic mutations in VCP cause multisystem proteinopathy (VCP-MSP), an autosomal dominant, adult-onset disorder causing dysfunction in several tissue types. It can result in complex neurodegenerative conditions including inclusion body myopathy, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or combinations of these. There is also an association with other neurodegenerative phenotypes such as Alzheimer-type dementia and Parkinsonism. Non-neurological presentations include Paget disease of bone and may also include cardiac dysfunction. We provide a detailed discussion of genotype-phenotype correlations, recommendations for genetic diagnosis, and genetic counselling implications of VCP-MSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald Pfeffer
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;
- Alberta Child Health Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Grace Lee
- Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (G.L.); (V.K.)
| | - Carly S. Pontifex
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;
| | - Roberto D. Fanganiello
- Oral Ecology Research Group, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada;
| | - Allison Peck
- Cure VCP Disease, Inc., Americus, GA 31709, USA;
| | - Conrad C. Weihl
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Virginia Kimonis
- Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (G.L.); (V.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gaba F, Oxley S, Liu X, Yang X, Chandrasekaran D, Kalsi J, Antoniou A, Side L, Sanderson S, Waller J, Ahmed M, Wallace A, Wallis Y, Menon U, Jacobs I, Legood R, Marks D, Manchanda R. Unselected Population Genetic Testing for Personalised Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction: A Qualitative Study Using Semi-Structured Interviews. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1028. [PMID: 35626184 PMCID: PMC9139231 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Unselected population-based personalised ovarian cancer (OC) risk assessments combining genetic, epidemiological and hormonal data have not previously been undertaken. We aimed to understand the attitudes, experiences and impact on the emotional well-being of women from the general population who underwent unselected population genetic testing (PGT) for personalised OC risk prediction and who received low-risk (<5% lifetime risk) results. This qualitative study was set within recruitment to a pilot PGT study using an OC risk tool and telephone helpline. OC-unaffected women ≥ 18 years and with no prior OC gene testing were ascertained through primary care in London. In-depth, semi-structured and 1:1 interviews were conducted until informational saturation was reached following nine interviews. Six interconnected themes emerged: health beliefs; decision making; factors influencing acceptability; effect on well-being; results communication; satisfaction. Satisfaction with testing was high and none expressed regret. All felt the telephone helpline was helpful and should remain optional. Delivery of low-risk results reduced anxiety. However, care must be taken to emphasise that low risk does not equal no risk. The main facilitators were ease of testing, learning about children’s risk and a desire to prevent disease. Barriers included change in family dynamics, insurance, stigmatisation and personality traits associated with stress/worry. PGT for personalised OC risk prediction in women in the general population had high acceptability/satisfaction and reduced anxiety in low-risk individuals. Facilitators/barriers observed were similar to those reported with genetic testing from high-risk cancer clinics and unselected PGT in the Jewish population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (F.G.); (S.O.); (X.L.); (D.C.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (F.G.); (S.O.); (X.L.); (D.C.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Xinting Liu
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (F.G.); (S.O.); (X.L.); (D.C.)
| | - Xin Yang
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (X.Y.); (A.A.)
| | - Dhivya Chandrasekaran
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (F.G.); (S.O.); (X.L.); (D.C.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Jatinderpal Kalsi
- Department of Women’s Cancer, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Antonis Antoniou
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (X.Y.); (A.A.)
| | - Lucy Side
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Saskia Sanderson
- Early Disease Detection Research Project UK (EDDRP UK), 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK;
| | - Jo Waller
- Cancer Prevention Group, King’s College London, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Department Clinical Genetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK;
| | - Andrew Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, 6th Floor Saint Marys Hospital, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
| | - Yvonne Wallis
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK;
| | - Usha Menon
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK;
| | - Ian Jacobs
- Department of Women’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia;
| | - Rosa Legood
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (R.L.); (D.M.)
| | - Dalya Marks
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (R.L.); (D.M.)
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (F.G.); (S.O.); (X.L.); (D.C.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK;
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (R.L.); (D.M.)
- Department of Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Etchegary H, Pullman D, Simmonds C, Rabie Z, Rahman P. Identifying Aspects of Public Attitudes Toward Whole Genome Sequencing to Inform the Integration of Genomics into Care. Public Health Genomics 2021; 24:229-240. [PMID: 34038902 DOI: 10.1159/000515952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The growth of global sequencing initiatives and commercial genomic test offerings suggests the public will increasingly be confronted with decisions about sequencing. Understanding public attitudes can assist efforts to integrate sequencing into care and inform the development of public education and outreach strategies. METHODS A 48-item online survey was advertised on Facebook in Eastern Canada and hosted on SurveyMonkey in late 2018. The survey measured public interest in whole genome sequencing and attitudes toward various aspects of sequencing using vignettes, scaled, and open-ended items. RESULTS While interest in sequencing was high, critical attitudes were observed. In particular, items measuring features of patient control and choice regarding genomic data were strongly endorsed by respondents. Majority wanted to specify upfront how their data could be used, retain the ability to withdraw their sample at a later date, sign a written consent form, and speak to a genetic counselor prior to sequencing. Concerns about privacy and unauthorized access to data were frequently observed. Education level was the sociodemographic variable most often related to attitude statements such that those with higher levels of education generally displayed more critical attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Attitudes identified here could be used to inform the development of implementation strategies for genomic medicine. Findings suggest health systems must address patient concerns about privacy, consent practices, and the strong desire to control what happens to their genomic data through public outreach and education. Specific oversight procedures and policies that are clearly communicated to the public will be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Etchegary
- Assistant Professor Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Daryl Pullman
- Professor of Medicine (Bioethics), Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Charlene Simmonds
- Manager, Health Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Zoha Rabie
- Research Assistant, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Proton Rahman
- Professor of Medicine (Rheumatology), Memorial University and Rheumatologist, Eastern Regional Health Authority, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
López-Fernández A, Villacampa G, Grau E, Salinas M, Darder E, Carrasco E, Torres-Esquius S, Iglesias S, Solanes A, Gadea N, Velasco A, Urgell G, Torres M, Tuset N, Brunet J, Corbella S, Balmaña J. Patients' and professionals' perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Genet Med 2021; 23:1450-1457. [PMID: 33824504 PMCID: PMC8023774 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01157-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify predictors of patient acceptance of non-in-person cancer genetic visits before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the preferences of health-care professionals. METHODS Prospective multicenter cohort study (N = 578, 1 February 2018-20 April 2019) and recontacted during the COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. Health-care professionals participated in May 2020. Association of personality traits and clinical factors with acceptance was assessed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS Before COVID-19, videoconference was more accepted than telephone-based visits (28% vs. 16% pretest, 30% vs. 19% post-test). Predictors for telephone visits were age (pretest, odds ratio [OR] 10-year increment = 0.79; post-test OR 10Y = 0.78); disclosure of panel testing (OR = 0.60), positive results (OR = 0.52), low conscientiousness group (OR = 2.87), and post-test level of uncertainty (OR = 0.93). Predictors for videoconference were age (pretest, OR 10Y = 0.73; post-test, OR 10Y = 0.75), educational level (pretest: OR = 1.61), low neuroticism (pretest, OR = 1.72), and post-test level of uncertainty (OR = 0.96). Patients' reported acceptance for non-in-person visits after COVID-19 increased to 92% for the pretest and 85% for the post-test. Health-care professionals only preferred non-in-person visits for disclosure of negative results (83%). CONCLUSION These new delivery models need to recognize challenges associated with age and the psychological characteristics of the population and embrace health-care professionals' preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrià López-Fernández
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Elia Grau
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Duran i Reynals Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mónica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Duran i Reynals Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Darder
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Josep Trueta University Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.,Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Torres-Esquius
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Iglesias
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Duran i Reynals Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ares Solanes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neus Gadea
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angela Velasco
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Josep Trueta University Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gisela Urgell
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maite Torres
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Noemí Tuset
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Josep Trueta University Hospital, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Corbella
- School of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences. Ramon Llull University-Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. .,Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Guerra C, Joseph G, Lee SSJ, Shipman KJ, Allen J, Eubanks D, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson K, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Mittendorf KF, Shuster E, Muessig KR, Arnold B, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:1-11. [PMID: 32981477 PMCID: PMC7785634 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical genomic implementation studies pose challenges for informed consent. Consent forms often include complex language and concepts, which can be a barrier to diverse enrollment, and these studies often blur traditional research-clinical boundaries. There is a move toward self-directed, web-based research enrollment, but more evidence is needed about how these enrollment approaches work in practice. In this study, we developed and evaluated a literacy-focused, web-based consent approach to support enrollment of diverse participants in an ongoing clinical genomic implementation study. Methods: As part of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, we developed a web-based consent approach that featured plain language, multimedia, and separate descriptions of clinical care and research activities. CHARM offered clinical exome sequencing to individuals at high risk of hereditary cancer. We interviewed CHARM participants about their reactions to the consent approach. We audio recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews using a deductively and inductively derived codebook. We reviewed coded excerpts as a team to identify overarching themes. Results: We conducted 32 interviews, including 12 (38%) in Spanish. Most (69%) enrolled without assistance from study staff, usually on a mobile phone. Those who completed enrollment in one day spent an average of 12 minutes on the consent portion. Interviewees found the information simple to read but comprehensive, were neutral to positive about the multimedia support, and identified increased access to testing in the study as the key difference from clinical care. Conclusions: This study showed that interviewees found our literacy-focused, web-based consent approach acceptable; did not distinguish the consent materials from other online study processes; and valued getting access to testing in the study. Overall, conducting empirical bioethics research in an ongoing clinical trial was useful to demonstrate the acceptability of our novel consent approach but posed practical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kelly J Shipman
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jake Allen
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Donna Eubanks
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Research Data and Analysis Center, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Briana Arnold
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kraft SA, Rothwell E, Shah SK, Duenas DM, Lewis H, Muessig K, Opel DJ, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Demonstrating 'respect for persons' in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2020-106440. [PMID: 33023975 PMCID: PMC8021602 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The ethical principle of 'respect for persons' in clinical research has traditionally focused on protecting individuals' autonomy rights, but respect for participants also includes broader, although less well understood, ethical obligations to regard individuals' rights, needs, interests and feelings. However, there is little empirical evidence about how to effectively convey respect to potential and current participants. To fill this gap, we conducted exploratory, qualitative interviews with participants in a clinical genomics implementation study. We interviewed 40 participants in English (n=30) or Spanish (n=10) about their experiences with respect in the study and perceptions of how researchers in a hypothetical observational study could convey respect or a lack thereof. Most interviewees were female (93%), identified as Hispanic/Latino(a) (43%) or non-Hispanic white (38%), reported annual household income under US$60 000 (70%) and did not have a Bachelor's degree (65%); 30% had limited health literacy. We identified four key domains for demonstrating respect: (1) personal study team interactions, with an emphasis on empathy, appreciation and non-judgment; (2) study communication processes, including following up and sharing results with participants; (3) inclusion, particularly ensuring materials are understandable and procedures are accessible; and (4) consent and authorisation, including providing a neutral informed consent and keeping promises regarding privacy protections. While the experience of respect is inherently subjective, these findings highlight four key domains that may meaningfully demonstrate respect to potential and current research participants. Further empirical and normative work is needed to substantiate these domains and evaluate how best to incorporate them into the practice of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin Rothwell
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Seema K Shah
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hannah Lewis
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kristin Muessig
- Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Douglas J Opel
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Manchanda R, Sun L, Patel S, Evans O, Wilschut J, De Freitas Lopes AC, Gaba F, Brentnall A, Duffy S, Cui B, Coelho De Soarez P, Husain Z, Hopper J, Sadique Z, Mukhopadhyay A, Yang L, Berkhof J, Legood R. Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing across Multiple Countries and Health Systems. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071929. [PMID: 32708835 PMCID: PMC7409094 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical criteria/Family history-based BRCA testing misses a large proportion of BRCA carriers who can benefit from screening/prevention. We estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA testing in general population women across different countries/health systems. A Markov model comparing the lifetime costs and effects of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing all general population women ≥30 years compared with clinical criteria/FH-based testing. Separate analyses are undertaken for the UK/USA/Netherlands (high-income countries/HIC), China/Brazil (upper–middle income countries/UMIC) and India (low–middle income countries/LMIC) using both health system/payer and societal perspectives. BRCA carriers undergo appropriate screening/prevention interventions to reduce breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Outcomes include OC, BC, and additional heart disease deaths and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic/one-way sensitivity analyses evaluate model uncertainty. For the base case, from a societal perspective, we found that population-based BRCA testing is cost-saving in HIC (UK-ICER = $−5639/QALY; USA-ICER = $−4018/QALY; Netherlands-ICER = $−11,433/QALY), and it appears cost-effective in UMIC (China-ICER = $18,066/QALY; Brazil-ICER = $13,579/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in LMIC (India-ICER = $23,031/QALY). From a payer perspective, population-based BRCA testing is highly cost-effective in HIC (UK-ICER = $21,191/QALY, USA-ICER = $16,552/QALY, Netherlands-ICER = $25,215/QALY), and it is cost-effective in UMIC (China-ICER = $23,485/QALY, Brazil−ICER = $20,995/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in LMIC (India-ICER = $32,217/QALY). BRCA testing costs below $172/test (ICER = $19,685/QALY), which makes it cost-effective (from a societal perspective) for LMIC/India. Population-based BRCA testing can prevent an additional 2319 to 2666 BC and 327 to 449 OC cases per million women than the current clinical strategy. Findings suggest that population-based BRCA testing for countries evaluated is extremely cost-effective across HIC/UMIC health systems, is cost-saving for HIC health systems from a societal perspective, and can prevent tens of thousands more BC/OC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (L.S.); (S.P.); (O.E.); (F.G.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Li Sun
- Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (L.S.); (S.P.); (O.E.); (F.G.)
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (Z.S.); (R.L.)
| | - Shreeya Patel
- Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (L.S.); (S.P.); (O.E.); (F.G.)
| | - Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (L.S.); (S.P.); (O.E.); (F.G.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Janneke Wilschut
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands; (J.W.); (J.B.)
| | - Ana Carolina De Freitas Lopes
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil; (A.C.D.F.L.); (P.C.D.S.)
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (L.S.); (S.P.); (O.E.); (F.G.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.B.); (S.D.)
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.B.); (S.D.)
| | - Bin Cui
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (B.C.); (L.Y.)
| | - Patricia Coelho De Soarez
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil; (A.C.D.F.L.); (P.C.D.S.)
| | - Zakir Husain
- Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India;
- Department of Economics, Presidency University, Kolkata 700073, India
| | - John Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population & Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia;
| | - Zia Sadique
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (Z.S.); (R.L.)
| | - Asima Mukhopadhyay
- Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, West Bengal 700160, India;
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Li Yang
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (B.C.); (L.Y.)
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands; (J.W.); (J.B.)
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (Z.S.); (R.L.)
| |
Collapse
|