Enhanced platelet activation following coronary stent implantation in patients on hemodialysis

Shape memory polyurethane potentially used for vascular stents with water-induced stiffening and improved hemocompatibility

We designed a shape memory polyurethane potentially used for vascular stents with water-induced stiffening in vivo and improved hemocompatibility.

Formation of Calcified Nodule as a Cause of Early In-Stent Restenosis in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

Background Dialysis is an independent risk factor for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stent implantation in coronary arteries. However, the characteristics of ISR in patients undergoing dialysis remain unclear, as there are no histological studies evaluating the causes of this condition. The aim of the present study was to investigate the causes of ISR between patients who are undergoing dialysis and those who are not by evaluating tissues obtained from ISR lesions using directional coronary atherectomy. Methods and Results A total of 29 ISR lesions from 29 patients included in a multicenter directional coronary atherectomy registry of 128 patients were selected for analysis and divided into a dialysis group (n=8) and a nondialysis group (n=21). Histopathological evaluation demonstrated that an in-stent calcified nodule was a major histological characteristic of ISR lesions in the dialysis group and the prevalence of an in-stent calcified nodule was significantly higher in the dialysis group compared with the nondialysis group (75% versus 5%, respectively; P<0.01). On the other hand, the prevalence of an in-stent lipid-rich plaque was significantly lower in the dialysis group compared with the nondialysis group (0% versus 43%, respectively; P=0.03). In all cases with an in-stent calcified nodule, the underlying calcification before stent implantation was moderate to severe. When tissue characteristics were stratified according to duration post-stent implantation, an in-stent calcified nodule in the dialysis group was mainly observed within 1 year after stent implantation. Conclusions In-stent calcified nodules are a common cause of ISR in patients undergoing dialysis and are observed within 1 year after stent implantation, suggesting different causes of ISR between patients undergoing dialysis and those who are not.

CD62P and P10 as predictive markers for assessing the efficacy of hemodialysis in treating end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

CD62P is a platelet α-granule membrane protein, and P10 is a platelet membrane glycoprotein thrombospondin. To better understand the effects of hemodialysis (HD), we have conducted this study to investigate CD62P and P10 in assessing the efficacy of HD in treating patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

The case group consisted of 111 patients suffering ESRD treated with regular HD and the control group enrolled 117 healthy subjects. Before and after HD treatment, a series of parameters were observed, based on which, CD62P and P10 levels were detected in the patients in two groups before and after HD therapy. The correlation analysis analyzed the correlations of CD62P and P10 markers with serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and subjective score; and logistic regression analysis was performed to reveal factors affecting the efficacy of HD.

RESULTS

BUN, Scr, serum phosphorus, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), fibrinogen, and β2-microglobulin (β2-MG) decreased while hemoglobin, albumin, and activated partial thromboplastin time increased in the patients suffering ESRD; patients presented with improvements in subjective symptoms and an increase in dry weight. CD62P and P10 levels were lower in post-treatment patients. CD62P and P10 positively correlated with Scr, BUN and subjective score; post-treatment CD62P and P10 levels, BUN, hemoglobin, albumin, triglyceride, iPTH, β2-MG, and fibrinogen were correlated with the efficacy of HD.

CONCLUSION

CD62P and P10 might be correlated to the efficacy of HD in treating ESRD, in turn providing predictive markers for assessing the ability of HD in treating ESRD.

Usefulness of Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis

The outcomes of second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) are unknown in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) although HD has been reported as a strong predictor of adverse outcome after the first-generation DES implantation. The OUCH-PRO Study is a prospective multicenter single-arm registry design to study clinical and angiographic outcomes after everolimus-eluting stent (EES). Patients who underwent maintenance HD were prospectively enrolled at the time of elective coronary intervention using EES. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed in an independent core laboratory. The primary end point was the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization at 1 year. A total of 123 patients were enrolled and 161 EES were implanted. The TVF rate at 1 year was 18% (4% cardiac death, 0% MI, 17% target vessel revascularization). No stent thrombosis was documented. Other clinical events at 1 year were 3% noncardiac death, 3% stroke, and 9% non-target-vessel revascularization. Late lumen loss in stent was 0.37 ± 0.63 mm at 8 months. In conclusion, EES had a high TVF rate and great late lumen loss in patients on HD compared with previous huge EES data in non-HD patients.

Effect of Hemodialysis on 7-Year Clinical Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are reported to show poor clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) compared with non-HD patients and their long-term prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 489 consecutive patients undergoing PCI with SES and performed a retrospective analysis focusing on HD patients. Median follow-up was 7.0 years (interquartile range, 4.2-7.9) and the follow-up rate was 100%. At the 7-year follow-up, the cumulative incidences of all-cause death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly higher in HD patients than in non-HD patients (HD vs. non-HD=34.7% vs. 9.6%, 42.6% vs. 10.2% and 75.3% vs. 24.4%, respectively; log-rank P<0.001). Cox-proportional hazard analysis revealed that independent predictors of all-cause death were HD (hazard ratio [HR] 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-6.00), insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (HR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.17-4.11), heart failure (HR 2.58, 95% CI: 1.25-5.32) and older age (HR 1.06/1-age, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10). Moreover, HD was an independent predictor of TLR (HR 3.63, 95% CI: 1.85-7.11) and MACE (HR 3.54, 95% CI: 2.19-5.73).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, Japanese HD patients undergoing PCI with SES showed poorer long-term clinical outcomes than non-HD patients. HD was a strong predictor of long-term adverse events after SES implantation.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors or famotidine on the antiplatelet actions during dual-antiplatelet therapy in Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that the antiplatelet action becomes attenuated when a proton pump inhibitor is used in combination with clopidogrel.

PURPOSE

The effect of an antacid causing platelet aggregation during the administration of clopidogrel was investigated.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects consisted of 265 patients with coronary artery disease. Platelet aggregation function testing (light transmittance aggregometry) was conducted while aspirin and clopidogrel 75 mg were taken orally and the minimum concentration of aggregation induction platelet aggregation threshold index was measured. The ADP-PATI, measured with ADP as the inducing substance, was compared and investigated according to the type of concomitantly used antacid.

RESULT

The results of the ADP-PATI were: control group: 3.47 ± 0.95 μM (N = 67), famotidine group: 3.80 ± 0.52 μM (N = 32), rabeprazole group: 3.43 ± 0.93 μM (N = 87), lansoprazole group: 3.28 ± 1.04 μM (N = 63) and omeprazole group: 3.33 ± 0.81 μM (N = 16). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding the ADP-PATI of respective groups compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant use of famotidine, rabeprazole, lansoprazole, and omeprazole did not affect the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel in Japanese patients.