Intracardiac echocardiography for percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: initial experiences in Japan

A comparison of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for guiding device closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect: A 15-year experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Our aim was to evaluate the fluoroscopy time (FT), procedure time (PT) safety and efficacy when using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in comparison to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance for transcatheter closure of Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect (OS-ASD).

METHOD

Ninety patients (n = 90) diagnosed with OS-ASD underwent transcatheter closure between March 2006 and October 2021. Fifty-seven patients were treated under ICE guidance, while 33 patients were treated under TEE guidance.

RESULTS

Mean age was 43 ± 15 years and 42 ± 10 years in the ICE and TEE groups, respectively. The majority of patients had a centrally placed defect. Median FT was 8.40 min versus 11.70 min (p < .001) in the ICE group compared to the TEE group, respectively. Median PT was 43 min versus 94 min (p < .001) in the ICE group compared to the TEE group, respectively. Both ICE and TEE provided high quality images. All interventions were completed successfully, except for one patient in the ICE group who experienced a device migration, the development of atrial tachycardia in one patient and atrial fibrillation in two patients in the ICE group which spontaneously cardioverted. There were no other complications.

CONCLUSION

This study on a consistent cohort of patients with OS-ASD undergoing percutaneous closure suggests that use of ICE is safe and efficacious. Compared to TEE, ICE demonstrated significantly shorter FT and PT, decreasing the entire duration of the procedure and x-ray exposure. No relevant differences were observed in terms of success rate and complications.

Intracardiac vs. transesophageal echocardiography for guiding transcatheter closure of interatrial communications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an established practice, and it requires monitoring and guidance. Both transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can be used as guidance tools. However, the use of ICE and TEE in structural heart disease is controversial and the advantages and disadvantages of both for ASD and PFO closure need to be investigated. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TEE and ICE for guiding transcatheter closure of ASD and PFO.

Methods

A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science was conducted from inception to May 2022. The outcomes of this study included average time for both fluoroscopy and the procedure, complete closure, length of stay at hospital and adverse events. This study was performed using mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

The meta-analysis was conducted with a total of 11 studies, involving 4,748 patients were included in meta-analysis, including 2,386 patients in the ICE group and 2,362 patients in the TEE group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with TEE, ICE was shorter in time both fluoroscopy [MD: -3.72 (95%CI: -4.09 to -3.34) minutes, P < 0.00001] and the procedure [MD: -6.43 (95%CI: -7.65 to -5.21) minutes, P < 0.00001], shorter length of stay at hospital [MD = -0.95 (95% CI = -1.21 to -0.69) days, P < 0.00001], lower incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.84, P < 0.0001), and the arrhythmia (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.94, P = 0.03) and vascular complications (RR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.29 to 0.92, P = 0.02) in ICE group were lower than those in TEE group. No significant difference in complete closure was found between ICE and TEE (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.03, P = 0.74).

Conclusion

Under the premise of ensuring successful rate of complete closure, ICE can shorten time between fluoroscopy and procedure and length of stay at hospital, and there was no increase in adverse events. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm the benefits of using ICE in ASD and PFO closure.

Intracardiac Echocardiography Guidance for Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defects - Nationwide Registry Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been used for percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure, with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance recently being introduced.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Japanese Structural Heart Disease Registry was established by the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. This study analyzed data from the Registry for 2,859 consecutive cases undergoing percutaneous ASD closure between January 2015 and December 2020. ASD closure was performed under ICE guidance (n=519; 18.2%), TEE guidance (n=1,428; 49.9%), or TEE plus ICE guidance ("Both"; n=900 cases; 31.5%). The success rates were similar in the TEE, ICE, and both groups (99.0%, 99.2%, vs. 98.0%, respectively; P=0.054), as were complication rates (1.2%, 0.5%, vs. 2.1%, respectively; P=0.24). In the TEE and Both groups, 92.4% and 79.6% of patients required general anesthesia, compared with only 2.9% of patients in the ICE group (P<0.001). Fluoroscopic time was longer in the ICE and Both groups than in the TEE group (median [interquartile range] 19 [14-28] and 21 [13-30] vs. 12 [8-19] min, respectively; P<0.001). Rim deficiency and larger defect diameter were inversely related, whereas hospital volume was positively related to ICE guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous transcatheter ASD closure was as feasible under ICE as under TEE guidance. ICE guidance is used for less challenging cases in high-volume centers in Japan.

Visibility of Pulmonary Valve and Pulmonary Regurgitation on Intracardiac Echocardiography in Adult Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). However, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) cannot fully visualize the pulmonary valve (PV) and PR. We investigated whether intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) could visualize the PV and PR better than TTE. Thirty adult patients with TOF (mean age 33 ± 15 years) scheduled for cardiac catheterization underwent ICE. The visualization of PV and the severity of PR were classified into three grades. ICE depicted the PV better than TTE (ICE vs. TTE: not visualized, partially visualized, and fully visualized: n = 1 [3%], n = 13 [43%], and n = 16 [53%] vs. n = 14 [47%], n = 13 [43%], and n = 3 [10%], p < 0.001). Especially in patients after pulmonary valve replacement (PVR), the PV was more fully visualized by ICE. The assessment of PR by TTE underestimated the severity of PR in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (severe PR: 8 [28%] vs. 22 [76%], p = 0.004), while there was no discrepancy between the results of ICE and MRI (21 [72%] vs. 22 [76%], p = 1.000). In comparison to TTE, ICE can safely provide better visualization of the PV and PR in adults with TOF, especially in patients who have undergone PVR.

Appropriate device selection for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Detail morphological evaluation for ASD is essential to achieve successful transcatheter closure. Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) is emerging, but few studies have comprehensively verified the usefulness of 3D-TEE. We divided 329 patients who underwent transcatheter ASD closure at our university hospital into 157 in the Conventional group evaluated with 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing (BS), and 172 in the 3D-TEE group evaluated with 3D-TEE additionally. We assessed usefulness of 3D-TEE and consider appropriate device selection procedure. Overall, the percentage with re-sizing of device tended to be lower in the 3D-TEE group than in the Conventional group (10.1% vs 6.0%, p = 0.187). Among preprocedural modalities, the device size was mainly decided based on the BS diameter. A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that large atrial septum aneurysms (ASA) were associated with a ≥ 2 mm discrepancy of the BS diameter from the preprocedural 3D-TEE diameter (p < 0.05). Compared to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder, the differences in device size and the preprocedural ASD measurement were greater when using the Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder (FFII). Particularly, among the patients implanted with FFIIs, the discrepancies of the device size from the 3D-TEE measurement were greater in patients with large ASA than those with small ASA. Preprocedural 3D-TEE is useful to select the appropriate device size. Particularly, it is necessary to select a much larger device than that derived from the preprocedural 3D-TEE measurement when using FFII in patients with a septal aneurysm.

Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography with a mechanical probe for catheter-based interventions: a 10-year prospective registry

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcome benefit of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with a mechanical probe during congenital heart disease interventions has not been fully investigated. We reported the long-term results of a prospective registry of interatrial shunt closure guided by mechanical ICE.

METHODS

We enrolled 537 patients (mean age 48 ± 19.0 years, 378 females) submitted to ICE-aided procedures in a prospective registry over a 10-year period (September 2003-September 2013). All patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before the planned procedure. We evaluated (1) structure identification capability, (2) fossa ovale and interatrial septum component measurement, (3) procedure monitoring capability, (4) procedural and fluoroscopy times, and radiograph dose, (5) probe-related complications.

RESULTS

ICE was successfully performed and was able to correctly identify the structures previously assessed by TEE in all patients. In 24 patients (4.5%), ICE allowed better anatomy definition than TEE. In 35 other patients (6.5%), ICE identified structures not observed by TEE, which led to change indications to interventions or the operative technique to be used. In 131 patients (24.4%), ICE evaluation led to change the planned device to be implanted. There was only one probe-related complication (0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical ICE may offer a valid alternative to conventional TEE in guiding congenital heart disease interventional procedures.