The evaluation of technical outcome and wire manipulation time within 30 min in patients with poor distal vessel quality on percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion

The added value of coronary CTA in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically investigate and summarize the utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in the management of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The authors searched the four databases between 2005 and 2023 for studies investigating the role of CCTA and invasive coronary angiograms (ICA) images when used as the pre-procedural tool for CTO-PCI. Efficacy and safety of CCTA in CTO-PCI treatment as a pre-procedural assessment tool was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were finally chosen for this systematic review. CCTA had a high degree of agreement with ICA when applied for J-CTO scoring system. A J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score > 3, together with calcification, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, and bending > 45° were shared imaging risk factors on both ICA and CCTA for technique failure and guidewire crossing over 30 min. Additionally, negative remodeling and multiple diseased vessel were significant indicators on CCTA. Although patients with pre-procedural CCTA showed a trend of higher success rate and easier guidewire crossing, and CCTA showed a slightly higher predictive accuracy for process success, no significant improvement in post-PCI major adverse cardiac events of using CCTA for assessment has been achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA is a safe and effective pre-operative tool of CTO-PCI. Except for the shared imaging risk factors with ICA for a hard CTO-PCI including calcification, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, bending > 45°, and J-CTO score > 3, factors like negative remodeling and multiple diseased vessel were also recognized as significant pre-operative assessment indicators on CCTA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A pre-procedural assessment based on coronary computed tomographic angiography has the potential to aid in the management of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

KEY POINTS

• A coronary computed tomographic angiography-based pre-procedural assessment can help chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention management. • The recognized high-risk features detected via coronary computed tomographic angiography and invasive coronary angiograms are comparable in detecting difficult lesions and chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention failure. • Coronary computed tomographic angiography has an additional value to be a safe and effective pre-procedural assessment tool for chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention.

Distal Target Vessel Quality and Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Distal vessel quality is a key parameter in the global chronic total occlusion (CTO) crossing algorithm.

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to evaluate the association of distal vessel quality with the outcomes of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 10,028 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed at 39 U.S. and non-U.S. centers between 2012 and 2022. A poor-quality distal vessel was defined as <2 mm diameter or with significant diffuse atherosclerotic disease. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat target vessel revascularization, tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or surgery, and stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 33% of all CTO lesions had poor-quality distal vessel. When compared with good-quality distal vessels, CTO lesions with a poor-quality distal vessel had higher J-CTO (Japanese chronic total occlusion) scores (2.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.2 ± 1.3; P < 0.01), lower technical (79.9% vs 86.9%; P < 0.01) and procedural (78.0% vs 86.8%; P < 0.01) success, and higher incidence of MACE (2.5% vs 1.7%; P < 0.01) and perforation (6.4% vs 3.7%; P < 0.01). A poor-quality distal vessel was independently associated with technical failure and MACE. Poor-quality distal vessels were associated with higher use of the retrograde approach (25.2% vs 14.9%; P < 0.01) and higher air kerma radiation dose (2.4 [IQR: 1.3-4.0] Gy vs 2.0 [IQR: 1.1-3.5] Gy; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A poor-quality distal vessel in CTO lesions is associated with higher lesion complexity, higher need for retrograde crossing, lower technical and procedural success, higher incidence of MACE and coronary perforation, and higher radiation dose.

A contemporary review of clinical significances of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions, with some Japanese insights

The clinical "significance" of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) has been evaluated. In the beginning, the effects on clinical endpoints were investigated by comparisons between cases of success and failure of CTO-PCI, which mostly demonstrated better long-term outcomes in the successful cases. Similarly, improvement of cardiac function or wall motion was proven by serial observational studies. Accordingly, several prospective randomized trials (RCTs), which should confirm such accumulated potential benefits, were recently conducted by comparison with studies of patients that had received optical medical therapy (OMT) alone. While they mostly demonstrated significant improvement of angina symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in the CTO-PCI group, they failed to prove a reduction of clinical events or improvement of left ventricle wall motion, compared with OMT. Concurrent guidelines or consensus documents emphasize that the principal indication for CTO-PCI is to improve symptoms. To determine strategy, the following must be discussed in each individual case: the probability of procedural success, the expectation of long-term patency, and an assessment of the balance between procedure-related complications and overall benefits. In essence, we believe the following facts to be the current sincere appraisal of CTO-PCI: (1) improvements of symptoms and QOL are established, but the others remain inconclusive, and; (2) their margins for improvement are narrowing and numbers of candidates are shrinking. Precision medicine or individualization may be the right directions to take, to enhance the potential of this treatment. This course of action demands discrimination of those candidates who will truly receive benefits from invasive treatment, and that still requires further clinical studies or actions.