Comparison of quantitative measurements between two different intravascular ultrasound catheters and consoles: in vitro and in vivo studies

Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study

Introduction

The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of quantitative measurements by contemporary intravascular imaging systems including optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and 6 intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) systems.

Methods

We imaged five cylindrical phantom models made from an acrylic resin with known lumen diameters (1.51, 2.03, 3.04, 4.04, and 5.04 mm, respectively) using OFDI (FastView and LUNAWAVE, Terumo), FD-OCT (Dragonfly JP and ILUMIEN OPTIS, Abbott Vascular), and 6 mechanically rotating IVUS systems including a system, two 40-MHz, one 45-MHz, two 60-Mhz and one broad-band frequency IVUS systems. The OFDI, FD-OCT, and IVUS images were obtained using automated motorized pullback in a tank filled with 37-degree Celsius saline and, in cases of OFDI and FD-OCT, contrast-saline mixture (1:1 ratio) and contrast under the system setting of the refractive index for the corresponding flush medium.

Results

All the imaging systems showed good accuracy and excellent precision of lumen measurement with the relative differences between the measured diameter and actual phantom diameter being ranging from −2.9% to 8.0% and minimum standard deviations of the measured diameters (≤0.02 mm).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that contemporary intravascular imaging systems including OFDI, FD-OCT, and IVUS provided clinically acceptable accuracy and excellent precision of quantitative lumen measurement in phantom models in vitro across a wide range of dimensions. Future research to confirm these findings in vivo are warranted.