Management of De Novo Carotid Stenosis and Postintervention Restenosis-Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting-a Review of Literature

Outcomes Following Carotid Revascularization in Patients with Prior Ipsilateral Carotid Artery Stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative

OBJECTIVES

The outcomes of carotid revascularization in patients with prior carotid artery stenting remain understudied. Prior research has not reported the outcomes after Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in patients with previous carotid artery stenting. In this study, we compared the peri-operative outcomes of TCAR, tfCAS and CEA in patients with prior ipsilateral CAS using the VQI.

METHODS

Using the Vascular Quality Initiative data from 2016 to 2023, we identified patients who underwent TCAR, tfCAS, or CEA following prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting. We included covariates such as age, race, sex, BMI, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, prior CAD, prior CABG/PCI, CHF, renal dysfunction, smoking, COPD, anemia), symptom status, urgency, ipsilateral stenosis, and contralateral occlusion into a regression model to compute propensity scores for treatment assignment. We then used the propensity scores for inverse probability-weighting and weighted logistic regression to compare in-hospital stroke, in-hospital death, stroke/death, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/death/MI, 30-day mortality and cranial nerve injury (CNI) following TCAR, tfCAS, and CEA. We also analyzed trends in the proportions of patients undergoing the three revascularization procedures over time using Cochrane-Armitage trend testing.

RESULTS

We identified 2,137 patients undergoing revascularization following prior ipsilateral carotid stenting: 668 TCAR patients (31%), 1128 tfCAS patients (53%) and 341 CEA patients (16%). In asymptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with a lower yet not statistically significant in-hospital stroke/death than tfCAS (TCAR vs tfCAS: 0.7% vs 2.0%,aOR:0.33[0.11-1.05]; p=0.06), and similar odds of stroke/death with CEA (TCAR vs CEA: 0.7% vs 0.9%,aOR:0.80[0.16-3.98]; p=0.8). Compared with CEA, TCAR was associated with lower odds of post-operative MI (0.1% vs 14%,aOR:0.02[0.00-0.10]; p<0.001), stroke/death/MI (0.8% vs 15%,aOR:0.05[0.01-0.25]; p<0.001), and CNI (0.1% vs 3.8%,aOR:0.04[0.00-0.30]; p=0.002) in this patient population. In symptomatic patients, TCAR had an unacceptably elevated in-hospital stroke/death rate of 5.1% with lower rates of CNI than CEA. We also found an increasing trend in the proportion of patients undergoing TCAR following prior ipsilateral carotid stenting (2016 to 2023: 14% to 41%), with a relative decrease in proportions of tfCAS (61% to 45%) and CEA (25% to 14%) (p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting, TCAR was associated with lower odds of in-hospital stroke/death compared with tfCAS, with comparable stroke/death but lower postoperative MI and CNI rates compared with CEA. In symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with unacceptably elevated in-hospital stroke/death rates. In line with the post-procedure outcomes, there has been a steady increase in the proportion of patients with prior ipsilateral stenting undergoing TCAR over time.

The effect of carotid sinus neurectomy for carotid restenosis: a study protocol for a double-blinded and randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have a high restenosis rate, which increases the risk of stroke, and there is still a lack of effective treatment for restenosis. The cause of stenosis is related to local inflammatory reactions. Some basic studies have shown that the inflammatory response causing arterial stenosis is closely related to the nerve axons distributed in its outer membrane, and that removal of the nerve is effective in reducing the inflammatory response to prevent arterial stenosis. Therefore, we propose to design a randomized controlled trial to study whether disconnecting the carotid sinus nerve during a CEA operation can reduce carotid arterial restenosis.

METHOD/DESIGN

This study is a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. We will recruit 276 patients, who will be randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. Based on the standard CEA operation, the operator will search for the carotid sinus nerve on the surface of the internal carotid artery and will entirely transect it in the experimental group. Both groups will be guided with the same postoperative treatment and will be followed up every 3 months for 3 years after the operation. The main indices observed will be the carotid restenosis rate, incidence and nature of carotid plaque, and carotid blood flow velocity. Other indices will be arrhythmia, blood pressure variability, and biomarkers of atherosclerosis, such as blood lipids, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), homocysteine, and total bilirubin.

DISCUSSION

It is expected that carotid sinus nerve transection will significantly reduce the occurrence of restenosis after CEA, decrease the incidence of ischemic stroke, and realize the effective primary prevention of stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300073652. Registered on July 18, 2023.

The efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine as an add-on therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with carotid atherosclerosis: An updated meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a clinical metabolic syndrome characterized by persistent hyperglycemia. Patients with T2DM are more likely to have carotid atherosclerosis (CAS), which can lead to dizziness, amaurosis or even stroke. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has shown possible efficacy and safety in treating T2DM patients with CAS. However, the existing evidence was not robust enough and the results were out of date. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current evidence and systematically evaluate the effects of CHM on carotid plaque, glucose and lipid metabolism and vascular endothelial parameters in T2DM patients with CAS, providing a reference for subsequent research and clinical practice. Methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42022346274. Both Chinese and English databases were searched from their inceptions to 16 July 2022. All retrieved studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using oral CHM to treat T2DM patients with CAS were included. The literature quality was assessed using the risk of bias assessment tool in the Cochrane Handbook. Data extraction was conducted on the selected studies. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used for meta-analysis. Sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression or subgroup analysis. Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias and the evidence quality was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: 27 eligible studies, involving 2638 patients, were included in this study. Compared with western medicine (WM) alone, the addition of CHM was significantly better in improving carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) [mean difference (MD) = -0.11mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15 to -0.07, p < 0.01], carotid plaque Crouse score [MD = -1.21, 95%CI: -1.35 to -1.07, p < 0.01], total cholesterol (TC) [MD = -0.34 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.54 to -0.14, p < 0.01], triglyceride (TG) [MD = -0.26 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.37 to -0.15, p < 0.01], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [MD = -0.36 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.47 to -0.25, p < 0.01], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [MD = 0.22 mmol/L, 95%CI: 0.13 to 0.30, p < 0.01], glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) [MD = -0.36%, 95%CI: -0.51 to -0.21, p < 0.01], fasting blood glucose (FBG) [MD = -0.33 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.50 to -0.16, p < 0.01], 2-h postprandial glucose (2hPG) [MD = -0.52 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.95 to -0.09, p < 0.01], homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.88, 95%CI: -1.36 to -0.41, p < 0.01] and homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-β) [MD = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.51 to 1.09, p < 0.01]. Due to the small number of included studies, it is unclear whether CHM has an improving effect on nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistance index (RI). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Based on this meta-analysis, we found that in the treatment of T2DM patients with CAS, combined with CHM may have more advantages than WM alone, which can further reduce CIMT and carotid plaque Crouse score, regulate glucose and lipid metabolism, improve insulin resistance and enhance islet β-cell function. Meanwhile, CHM is relatively safe. However, limited by the quality and heterogeneity of included studies, the efficacy and safety of CHM remain uncertain. More high-quality studies are still needed to provide more reliable evidence for the clinical application of CHM. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022346274.

Hemodynamic evaluation of endarterectomy and stenting treatments for carotid web

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A carotid web is a thin, shelf-like luminal protrusion in the internal carotid artery that might cause carotid stenosis and stroke by inducing disturbed flow patterns, thrombosis, and abnormal biomechanical stimulus to the endothelial cells. This study simulated and evaluated how the two main treatments (endarterectomy and stenting) influence hemodynamic environments in the carotid artery and distal carotid siphon arteries, aiming to provide more references for the selection of clinical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The carotid web, endarterectomy, and stenting models were reconstructed based on CT images. The blood flow simulations were conducted, and critical parameters related to thrombosis formation and artery remodeling, including swirling strength, wall shear stress (WSS), vortex Q-criterion, and oscillating shear index (OSI), were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the model of the carotid web, obvious recirculation formed distal to the web, accompanied by lower velocity, lower WSS, higher relative resident time (RRT), and higher Q value. While in both two treatment models, the velocity increased and the Q value and RRT decreased at the carotid bifurcation. In addition, both treatments provide more kinetic energy to the distal carotid siphon artery, especially the stenting model.

CONCLUSION

The carotid web can significantly influence the flow environments in the carotid artery. Both endarterectomy and stenting treatments could significantly diminish the side effects of the web and are feasible choices for web patients in terms of hemodynamics. Besides, the treatments for the carotid web would also influence the flow patterns at the distal carotid siphon, especially for the stenting treatment. But more innovational designs are needed to make the minimally invasive stenting treatment more beneficial.

Lipid-related protein NECTIN2 is an important marker in the progression of carotid atherosclerosis: An intersection of clinical and basic studies

Background:

The nectin cell adhesion molecule 2 (NECTIN2) protein is a cell adhesion molecule involved in lipid metabolism. We aimed to explore the potential role of NECTIN2 in carotid atherosclerosis (CA).

Materials and Methods:

Patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were enrolled in this study. APOE-/- rats fed western or normal diet were used to model early pathological changes in CA. The relationship between patients’ lipid indices and plaque severity was assessed using ordinal regression analysis. Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was used to determine the causal links between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and atherosclerosis. After matching analysis of the single-cell transcriptome and microarray data of carotid plaques, NECTIN2 was identified as a key factor affecting CA. The importance of NECTIN2 was further verified by immunofluorescence staining of CEA and APOE-/- rat specimens.

Results:

A total of 108 patients were included. The traditional lipid indices did not correlate significantly with the plaque severity (P > 0.05). NECTIN2 provided a strong causal link between LDL-C level and CA (MR effect size >0). Deep-sequencing data illustrated that NECTIN2 expression was cell specific. In early-stage CA, NECTIN2 expression was increased in endothelial cells; however, in advanced-stage CA, NECTIN2 was overexpressed in macrophages located in fibrous caps. APOE-/- rat carotid artery and human carotid plaques modelled the entire atherosclerotic process, showing an upregulation of NECTIN2 expression in CA.

Conclusions:

Lipid-related protein NECTIN2 is a potential marker in CA progression and can potentially be a new therapeutic target for clinical prevention.

Treatment of the Carotid In-stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review

Background and Purpose: In-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stent (CAS) is not uncommon. We aimed to evaluate therapeutic options for ISR after CAS. Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE until November 2, 2020 for studies including the treatment for ISR after CAS. Results: In total, 35 studies, covering 1,374 procedures in 1,359 patients, were included in this review. Most cases (66.3%) were treated with repeat CAS (rCAS), followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (17.5%), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (14.3%), carotid artery bypass (1.5%), and external beam radiotherapy (0.4%). The rates of stroke & TIA within the postoperative period were similar in three groups (PTA 1.1%, rCAS 1.1%, CEA 1.5%). CEA (2.5%) was associated with a slightly higher rate of postoperative death than rCAS (0.7%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, the rate of long-term stroke & TIA in PTA was 5.7%, significantly higher than rCAS (1.8%, P = 0.036). PTA (27.8%) was also associated with a significantly higher recurrent restenosis rate than rCAS (8.2%, P = 0.002) and CEA (1.6%, P < 0.001). The long-term stroke & TIA and recurrent restenosis rates showed no significant difference between rCAS and CEA. Conclusions: rCAS is the most common treatment for ISR, with low postoperative risk and low long-term risk. CEA is an important alternative for rCAS. PTA may be less recommended due to the relatively high long-term risks of stroke & TIA and recurrent restenosis.

[Redo surgery of carotid arteries in patients with contraindications to carotid angioplasty and stenting]

AIM

The study was aimed at analysing the in-hospital results of carotid re-endarterectomy and plasty of the zone of reconstruction with a biological patch in patients with haemodynamically significant restenosis and contraindications to carotid angioplasty with stenting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period from 2008 to 2019, we operated on a total of 22 patients presenting with carotid restenosis and found to have contraindications to carotid angioplasty with stenting (an extended lesion, unstable neointima, calcification, pronounced tortuosity). Carotid re-endarterectomy was performed according to the classical technique. The time period after the first intervention to regression of pathology amounted to 48.5±21.3 months. All patients with clinical manifestations of angina pectoris were at the preoperative stage subjected to coronarography, as a result of which in one case a hybrid intervention was performed in the scope of percutaneous coronary intervention and carotid endarterectomy. The endpoints included death, myocardial infarction, acute impairment of cerebral circulation, and lesions of craniocerebral nerves.

RESULTS

Carotid re-endarterectomy was most often carried out according to the classical technique with plasty of the zone of reconstruction using a xenopericardial patch. Only in 1 case it was required to perform eversion carotid re-endarterectomy due to tortuosity of the internal carotid artery. During the in-hospital postoperative period no lethal outcomes, myocardial infarctions, nor haemorrhagic complications were registered. One patient was found to develop acute impairment of cerebral circulation. The most frequent complication was unilateral laryngeal paresis caused by lesions of craniocerebral nerves (n=3; 13.6%), with reversible neurological deficit. No cases of either thrombosis/restenosis or elevated pressure gradient in the area of implantation of the xenopericardial patch were revealed. The composite endpoint amounted to 18.2% (n=4).

CONCLUSION

The classical carotid re-endarterectomy was not accompanied by cases of thrombosis and restenosis during either the in-hospital or remote period of follow up, however turned out to be associated with a high frequency of the development of complications such as acute impairment of cerebral circulation and lesions of craniocerebral nerves.

Exosomes from Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Overexpressing Stanniocalcin-1 Promote Reendothelialization After Carotid Endarterium Mechanical Injury

OBJECTIVE

Stanniocalcin-1 (STC-1) is a secreted glycoprotein that participates in the regulation of inflammation, apoptosis, and necrosis. We investigated the reendothelialization effect of exosomes from adipose stem cells (ADSC) overexpressing STC-1 on injured carotid endarterium.

METHODS

ADSCs were transfected with lentivirus vectors containing pre-STC-1. PHK-26 as molecular probe was used to track the exosomes engulfed by mice arterial endothelial cells (MAEC). The role of STC-1-ADSC-Exosome (S-ADSC-Exo) in MAECs was verified through scratch test and tube forming. Expressions of STC-1 and NLRP3 inflammasome were detected by western blot and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Reendothelialization effect was inhibited by the antagonist of siRNA targeting STC-1. Carotid endarterium mechanical injury was induced by insertion with a guidewire into the common carotid artery lumen. Carotid arteries were harvested for histological examination, immunofluorescence staining, and Evan's blue staining.

RESULTS

Transfection of STC-1 significantly enhanced STC-1 levels in ADSCs, their exosomes, and MAECs. Compared with the control group and the ADSC-Exo group, STC-1 enriched exosomes markedly inhibited the expressions of NLRP3, Caspase-1, and IL-1β in MAECs, exhibited good lateral migration capacity, and promoted angiogenesis. Administration of siRNA targeting STC-1 completely abolished down-regulation of NLRP3, Caspase-1, and IL-1β by STC-1 and inhibited effects of S-ADSC-Exo on lateral migration and angiogenesis. In vivo administration of S-ADSC-Exo had reendothelialization effect on post-injury carotid endarterium as evidenced by thinner arterial wall, low-expressed NLRP3 inflammasome, and more living endothelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The reendothelialization effect of exosomes from ADSCs on post-injury carotid endarterium could be enhanced by genetic modification of the exosomes to contain elevated STC-1, possibly through suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated inflammation.

Carotid endarterectomy should be performed early or delayed in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis?

BACKGROUND

To date, the literature directly comparing early carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and delayed CEA in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (CS) is limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early CEA and delayed CEA in patients with symptomatic CS by performing a meta-analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The PubMed, Cochrane Library (last searched in May 2020) and relevant websites such as Web of Science and EMBASE (1990 to May 2020) were searched. All meta-analyses of eligible results were conducted using the STATA version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 7 articles were included in the study hailing from the New Scotland, Chicago, Sweden, UK, Italy, and France. In this study, the early CEA meant that the procedure was performed within the first 14 days or first 30 days. And the delayed CEA meant the procedure was performed more than 14 days or 30 days after the symptom occurrence. Referring to the latter early CEA group and delayed CEA group, there were three publications. The results illustrated that the early CEA group was not associated with a higher incidence of stroke (OR = 0.77, 95 % CI: 0.273-2.170; P = 0.620). And no statistic difference was found on the incidence of postoperative 30-day mortality and stroke or mortality. Meanwhile, referring to the former early CEA group and delayed CEA group, there were six articles. The results demonstrated that the early CEA group was associated with a higher rate of postoperative 30-day mortality (RD = 0.010, 95 % CI: 0.002 to 0.019; P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis of these related studies suggests that, compared to the delayed CEA group, the early CEA performed in patients with the acute post stroke phase resulted in a higher risk of postoperative mortality. Therefore, the delayed CEA was safer than early CEA for patients with symptomatic CS.

The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review

Carotid artery stenosis (CS) is a major medical problem affecting approximately 10% of the general population 80 years or older and causes stroke in approximately 10% of all ischemic events. In patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe CS, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), has been used to lower the risk of stroke. In primary CS, CEA was found to be superior to best medical therapy (BMT) according to 3 large randomized controlled trials (RCT). Following CEA and CAS, restenosis remains an unsolved problem involving a large number of patients as the current treatment recommendations are not as clear as those for primary stenosis. Several studies have evaluated the risk of restenosis, reporting an incidence ranging from 5% to 22% after CEA and an in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate ranging from 2.7% to 33%. Treatment and optimal management of this disease process, however, is a matter of ongoing debate, and, given the dearth of level 1evidence for the management of these conditions, the relevant guidelines lack clarity. Moreover, the incidence rates of stroke and complications in patients with carotid stenosis are derived from studies that did not use contemporary techniques and materials. Rapidly changing guidelines, updated techniques, and materials, and modern medical treatments make actual incidence rates barely comparable to previous ones. For these reasons, RCTs are critical for determining whether these patients should be treated with more aggressive treatments additional to BMT and identifying those patients indicated for surgical or endovascular treatments. This review summarizes the current evidence and controversies concerning the risks, causes, current treatment options, and prognoses in patients with restenosis after CEA or CAS.

Impact of early diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis by carotid ultrasound: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of carotid ultrasound (CU) for early diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis (CAS).

METHODS

Literatures will be sought from the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The search will cover from the start of indexing to the present without any limitations of language and publication status. All study quality will be assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, and data will be analyzed by RevMan V.5.3 software and Stata V.12.0 software.

RESULTS

This study will investigate the impact of CU for early diagnosis of CAS through sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study may provide helpful evidence for the impact of CU for early diagnosis of CAS.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019153904.