1
|
Jia H, Luo X. I Wear a Mask for My Country: Conspiracy Theories, Nationalism, and Intention to Adopt Covid-19 Prevention Behaviors at the Later Stage of Pandemic Control in China. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2023; 38:543-551. [PMID: 34353184 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1958982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Various conspiracy theories have accompanied COVID-19 since its initial outbreak. Based on a nationwide survey in China, this study probes the health consequences of beliefs in different COVID-19 conspiracy theories in China. The research found that believing the coronavirus has a foreign natural origin was associated with increased rather than decreased intention to adopt protective behaviors. Nonetheless, believing that the source of the pandemic was a Chinese lab or that it is a foreign biological weapon was related to reduced intentions to protect one's health. In addition, measured as national pride and satisfaction with China's pandemic control effort, people's level of nationalism was strongly associated with their intention to adopt protective behaviors, which moderates the health consequences of believing in false conspiracy theories. Scientific literacy was also associated with an increased likelihood of adopting preventive measures. Despite revealing the diversified health consequences of conspiracy beliefs, this study demonstrates the importance of examining collectivist sociopolitical constructs in health communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hepeng Jia
- School of Communication, Soochow University
| | - Xi Luo
- School of Communication, Soochow University
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pearce JM, Lindekilde L, Parker D, Rogers MB. Communicating with the Public About Marauding Terrorist Firearms Attacks: Results from a Survey Experiment on Factors Influencing Intention to "Run, Hide, Tell" in the United Kingdom and Denmark. RISK ANALYSIS : AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR RISK ANALYSIS 2019; 39:1675-1694. [PMID: 30893483 DOI: 10.1111/risa.13301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Effective risk communication is an integral part of responding to terrorism, but until recently, there has been very little pre-event communication in a European context to provide advice to the public on how to protect themselves during an attack. Following terrorist attacks involving mass shootings in Paris, France, in November 2015, the U.K. National Police Chiefs' Council released a Stay Safe film and leaflet that advises the public to "run," "hide," and "tell" in the event of a firearms or weapons attack. However, other countries, including Denmark, do not provide preparedness information of this kind, in large part because of concern about scaring the public. In this survey experiment, 3,003 U.K. and Danish participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: no information, a leaflet intervention, and a film intervention to examine the impact of "Run, Hide, Tell" advice on perceptions about terrorism, the security services, and intended responses to a hypothetical terrorist firearms attack. Results demonstrate important benefits of pre-event communication in relation to enhancing trust, encouraging protective health behaviors, and discouraging potentially dangerous actions. However, these findings also suggest that future communications should address perceived response costs and target specific problem behaviors. Cross-national similarities in response suggest this advice is suitable for adaptation in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M Pearce
- Department of War Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lasse Lindekilde
- Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - David Parker
- Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - M Brooke Rogers
- Department of War Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kulkarni S, Lewis K, Adams SA, Brandt HM, Lead JR, Ureda JR, Fedrick D, Mathews C, Friedman DB. A Comprehensive Analysis of How Environmental Risks of Breast Cancer are Portrayed on the Internet. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION 2018; 49:222-233. [PMID: 30079123 PMCID: PMC6075842 DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2018.1473182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective online communication about the environmental risk factors of breast cancer is essential because of the multitude of environmental exposures and debate regarding the conclusiveness of scientific evidence. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the content, readability, and cultural sensitivity of online resources focused on the environmental risks factors of breast cancer. METHODS A purposive sample of webpages focused on environmental risk factors of breast cancer was obtained through a Google search using 17 search terms. Using nonparametric statistics, we assessed the content, readability, and cultural appropriateness of 235 webpages. RESULTS Eighty-two percent of webpages referred to research studies in their content. For the majority of sites, readability was at a high-school reading grade level. Webpages were not explicitly intended for specific racial/ethnic groups. DISCUSSION Technical language and non-culturally specific messages may hinder users' attention to and comprehension of online breast cancer information. Additional research is needed to examine in-depth the accuracy of this online content. TRANSLATION TO HEALTH EDUCATION PRACTICE Findings suggest that collaborations between scientists, health educators, website designers/media professionals, and the community will be critical to the delivery of accurate, up-to-date, plain-language, and culturally sensitive information about breast cancer and the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibani Kulkarni
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Room 529, Columbia, SC 29208
| | - Kaleea Lewis
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Room 529, Columbia, SC 29208
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Carolina
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, 915 Greene Street, Room 244, Columbia SC 29208
| | - Heather M Brandt
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Discovery I Building, Columbia, SC 29208
| | - Jamie R Lead
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina
- Center for Environmental Nanoscience and Risk, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Public Health Research Center, Suite 511, Columbia, SC 29208
| | - John R Ureda
- Insights Consulting, Inc. 2728 Wilmot Ave., Columbia, SC 29205-254
| | - Delores Fedrick
- Chester County Literacy Council, 109 Ella Street, Chester, SC, 29706
| | - Chris Mathews
- Turning Pages Greater Columbia Literacy Council, 4711 Forest Drive, Suite 3, PMB 267, Columbia SC 29206
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 557, Columbia SC, 29208
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scherr CL, Dean M, Clayton MF, Hesse BW, Silk K, Street RL, Krieger J. A Research Agenda for Communication Scholars in the Precision Medicine Era. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 22:839-848. [PMID: 28956728 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1363324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The 2015 announcement of the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) galvanized and energized efforts to reconsider medical practice through tailoring of prevention and treatment recommendations based on genetics, environment, and lifestyle. Numerous disciplines contributed white papers identifying challenges associated with PMI and calling for discipline-specific research that might provide solutions to such challenges. Throughout these white papers, the prominence of communication in achieving the PMI's goals is obviously apparent. In this article, we highlight opportunities for communication scholars' contributions to the PMI based on challenges identified in white papers from other disciplines and work already conducted by research teams in the field of communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney L Scherr
- a Department of Communication Studies , Northwestern University , Evanston , Illinois , USA
| | - Marleah Dean
- b Department of Communication , University of South, Florida , Tampa , Florida , USA
| | | | - Bradford W Hesse
- d Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch , National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , Maryland , USA
| | - Kami Silk
- e Department of Communication , Michigan State University , East Lansing , Michigan , USA
| | - Richard L Street
- f Department of Communication , Texas A&M University , College Station , Texas , USA
| | - Janice Krieger
- g STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications , University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith SW, Hitt R, Russell J, Nazione S, Silk K, Atkin CK, Keating D. Risk Belief and Attitude Formation From Translated Scientific Messages About PFOA, an Environmental Risk Associated With Breast Cancer. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 32:279-287. [PMID: 27219106 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1138350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Evidence regarding possible environmental causes of breast cancer is advancing. Often, however, the public is not informed about these advances in a manner that is easily understandable. This research translates findings from biologists into messages at two literacy levels about perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a possible environmental contributor to breast cancer. The Heuristic Systematic Model (HSM) was used to investigate how ability, motivation, and systematic and heuristic processing lead to risk beliefs and, ultimately, to negative attitudes for individuals receiving translated scientific messages about PFOA. Participants (N = 1,389) came from the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation's Army of Women. Findings indicated that ability, in the form of translated messages, predicted systematic processing, operationalized as knowledge gain, which was negatively associated with formation of risk beliefs that led to negative attitudes toward PFOA. Heuristic processing cues, operationalized as perceived message quality and source credibility, were positively associated with risk beliefs, which predicted negative attitudes about PFOA. Overall, more knowledge and lower literacy messages led to lower perceived risk, while greater involvement and ratings of heuristic cues led to greater risk perceptions. This is an example of a research, translation, and dissemination team effort in which biologists created knowledge, communication scholars translated and tested messages, and advocates were participants and those who disseminated messages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandi W Smith
- a Department of Communication , Michigan State University
| | - Rose Hitt
- a Department of Communication , Michigan State University
| | | | | | - Kami Silk
- a Department of Communication , Michigan State University
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finn S, Collman G. The Pivotal Role of the Social Sciences in Environmental Health Sciences Research. New Solut 2016; 26:389-411. [PMID: 27605565 DOI: 10.1177/1048291116666485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Environmental health sciences research seeks to elucidate environmental factors that put human health at risk. A primary aim is to develop strategies to prevent or reduce exposures and disease occurrence. Given this primary focus on prevention, environmental health sciences research focuses on the populations most at risk such as communities of color and/or low socioeconomic status. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences research programs incorporate the principles of Community-Based Participatory Research to study health disparities. These programs promote community engagement, culturally appropriate communications with a variety of stakeholders, and consideration of the social determinants of health that interact with environmental factors to increase risk. Multidisciplinary research teams that include social and behavioral scientists are essential to conduct this type of research. This article outlines the history of social and behavioral research funding at National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and offers examples of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences-funded projects that exemplify the value of social science to the environmental health sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Symma Finn
- 1 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gwen Collman
- 1 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|