1
|
Canfield J, Truong V, Bereznicka A, Bridden C, Liebschutz J, Alford DP, Saitz R, Samet JH, Walley AY, Lunze K. Evaluation of a student clinical research education program in addiction medicine. Ann Med 2023; 55:361-370. [PMID: 36629696 PMCID: PMC9848279 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2154833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate an experiential student clinical addiction research program by analyzing its components, evaluation survey data, and scientific outputs. METHODS In 1995, we established a summer research program supporting trainees to gain exposure to clinical addiction research careers. This curriculum employed a three-pronged approach that combined mentored research training, didactic education, and clinical observerships for medical students and other trainees to acquire experience with addiction medicine and research. Utilizing the Kirkpatrick model as program evaluation framework, we analyzed evaluation data from programmatic surveys (didactic seminar evaluations, overall program surveys) and conducted qualitative feedback exploration. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2019, 56 trainees and 26 faculty mentors participated in the curriculum. To date, 25 students published 38 papers with their faculty mentor. Analysis of the past 12 years of program evaluation data demonstrated that students highly valued individually-mentored research experiences. They indicated that seminars familiarized them with the foundations of different clinical care models and career trajectories in addiction medicine. Clinical observerships provided students with patient contacts in various multidisciplinary addiction treatment settings. These experiences, perhaps most importantly hearing about patients' lived experiences, meaningfully informed various research and didactic activities. CONCLUSIONS This summer student research program successfully introduced students to addiction medicine and research, manifested by high peer-reviewed publication productivity. While our program engaged and involved committed mentors and inspired mentees to pursue professional paths in addiction research, it did not specifically incorporate attention to equity and diversity into program planning and implementation. Going forward, the program will improve equity by increasing the recruitment of trainees from disadvantaged groups and engaging underrepresented faculty.KEY MESSAGESSummer programs can be effective in engaging medical students and trainees in research early in their trajectory and inspire them to incorporate research into their careers.Programs that integrate experiential addiction research learning, i.e. mentored research activities, didactic sessions, and clinical observerships, can provide trainees with a profound understanding of substance use disorder treatment and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jules Canfield
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ve Truong
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Agata Bereznicka
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carly Bridden
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jane Liebschutz
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel P Alford
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Saitz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Samet
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Opioid Overdose Prevention Pilot Program, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karsten Lunze
- Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Friedman DB, Escoffery C, Noblet SB, Agnone CM, Flicker KJ. Building Capacity in Implementation Science for Cancer Prevention and Control Through a Research Network Scholars Program. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:1957-1966. [PMID: 34240329 PMCID: PMC8266406 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-02066-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Building capacity of researchers and practitioners in the dissemination and implementation (D&I) of evidence-based interventions is greatly needed to improve cancer prevention and control. A diverse workforce trained in D&I science is critical for improving cancer outcomes and reducing cancer-related health disparities. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Scholars Program aimed at training students, researchers, and practitioners in D&I for cancer prevention and control launched in 2021. The purpose of this paper is to describe the creation of the training program, curriculum, and evaluation plans, and to present the baseline results and lessons learned. CPCRN investigator and partner input and formative interviews (n = 16) with assistant professors, postdoctoral fellow, doctoral and undergraduate students, and a program manager guided development of the program. Twenty of 24 applicants were accepted into the inaugural year of the program. The majority of accepted scholars identified as female (80%) and were graduate students (50%). Thirty-five percent were of racially diverse backgrounds. Most self-rated their previous D&I experience and competencies at a beginner level. The multi-step approach used for development of this training program and lessons learned will be helpful for others collaborating on preparing the research and practice workforce in D&I science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior and Office for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Samuel B Noblet
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior and Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Christine M Agnone
- Emory Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Kimberly J Flicker
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior and Office for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beck Dallaghan GL, Coe CL, Wright ST, Jordan SG. Mentoring Medical Education Research: Guidelines from a Narrative Review. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2022; 32:723-731. [PMID: 35818612 PMCID: PMC9270543 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-022-01565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Mentorship is critical to develop research scholars. Current literature provides mentorship guidance for biomedical research; however, mentorship for educational research is scarce. We explored literature to offer evidence-based guidance for medical education research mentors. A librarian searched peer-reviewed literature from 2001 to 2021 to identify guidelines for research mentors. Thirty-five articles were included in this narrative review. Our results identified attributes of mentors, overlapping roles, and barriers and benefits of mentoring. The structures and processes related to mentoring are reviewed and applicability to medical education research mentorship is summarized. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01565-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
- Office of Medical Education, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 108 Taylor Hall, CB 7321, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Catherine L. Coe
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Sarah Towner Wright
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Sheryl G. Jordan
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coaching tailored by stages: A valuable educational strategy to achieve independence in research. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e141. [PMID: 34422321 PMCID: PMC8358839 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study presents an individualized coaching approach tailored to the stages of proximity of promising scientists interested in becoming independently funded researchers in the context of a minority-serving institution. This strategy defined the participant’s stage of proximity by their number of first-author publications in peer-reviewed journals and their track record in submitting research grants. We argue that coaching tailored by stages is an asset to maintain the enthusiasm, persistence, and positive attitude of promising scientists as they try to reach independent investigator status. Furthermore, this valuable educational approach supports the development of management and leadership skills in defined scientific domains.
Collapse
|