"Ovarian Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Our Experience"

Examining the Outcomes of Palliative Oophorectomy of Ovarian Metastases in de-Novo Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Its Association with RAS Mutation Status: Insights from a Single-Institution Perspective

Background and Aim

Ovarian metastasis occurs in 3-5% of patients with CRC. Ovaries are considered sanctuary sites and typically do not respond effectively to chemotherapy. Patients with KRAS mutation generally have a worse prognosis compared to those with KRAS wild type. This study will discuss the effect of palliative oophorectomy on survival rates for those patients compared to chemotherapy alone.

Methods

This is a retrospective study; we reviewed the charts of patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer at KHCC between January 2015 and December 2022. Out of 862 patients, 50 patients were eligible for the study; Patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment type, the palliative oophorectomy group and the chemotherapy alone group. The primary endpoint was a three-year median overall survival rate between the two groups. The secondary endpoints included three-year median progression-free survival and the difference in survival rate between the groups based on KRAS and BRAF mutation status.

Results

In the oophorectomy group, the median overall survival (OS) was 19.3 months compared to 10.3 months in the chemotherapy alone group, with a P value of 0.05. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was also better in the oophorectomy group at 14.6 months compared to 9.4 months, with a P value of 0.59. For patients with KRAS mutation who underwent oophorectomy, the median OS was significantly better at 29.1 months compared to 10.3 months in the chemotherapy alone group, P value of 0.03.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that palliative oophorectomy in metastatic CRC is associated with better survival. Even patients who harbor mutated KRAS, which typically have more aggressive disease behavior, showed better survival outcomes with oophorectomy compared to systemic chemotherapy alone.

Ovarian metastases in young women with colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous studies indicated that approximately 3.4% of female colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk of developing ovarian metastases (OM). It has been suggested that young women more frequently develop this form of metastatic disease.

METHODS

This study evaluated, in 6 Dutch hospitals, the proportion of young women with CRC who developed OM.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 200 young (age ≤ 55) women with CRC, the proportion of patients diagnosed with synchronous or metachronous OM was calculated. This study revealed that 5% (n = 10) of young female CRC patients developed ovarian metastases resulting in a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 40%. Furthermore, six patients had concurrent peritoneal metastases, five patients had bilateral ovarian metastases, and five patients had synchronous metastases, while the median time of the occurrence of metachronous metastases (n = 5) was 19 months.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective multicenter cohort study indicates that 5% of young women with CRC either present with or develop OM. This result appears to be clinically relevant and demonstrates the need for improved surveillance for young women diagnosed with CRC.

Tumor Microenvironment Shapes Colorectal Cancer Progression, Metastasis, and Treatment Responses

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most devastating diseases that accounts for numerous deaths worldwide. Tumor cell-autonomous pathways, such as the oncogenic signaling activation, significantly contribute to CRC progression and metastasis. Recent accumulating evidence suggests that the CRC microenvironment also profoundly promotes or represses this process. As the roles of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in CRC progression and metastasis is gradually uncovered, the importance of these non-cell-autonomous signaling pathways is appreciated. However, we are still at the beginning of this TME function exploring process. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the TME in CRC progression and metastasis by focusing on the gut microbiota and host cellular and non-cellular components. We also briefly discuss TME-remodeling therapies in CRC.

Gone but Not Forgotten: Ovarian Metastasis From a Colon Carcinoma in a 19-Year-Old Female

Ovarian tumors occurring secondarily to metastatic colorectal carcinoma remain a rare occurrence. Since ovarian tumors remain predominantly asymptomatic in the initial stages, they are often diagnosed incidentally. The vague, non-specific symptoms elicited by a secondary ovarian carcinoma, coupled with a histopathology remarkably similar to that evoked by primary ovarian tumors, render its ascertainment a diagnostic challenge. We hereby delineate an interesting case of a metachronous ovarian adenocarcinoma in a 19-year-old patient with a prior medical history significant for colorectal carcinoma treated with hemicolectomy. Subsequent diagnostic workup divulged a mass in her left adnexal region, which was ultimately diagnosed as a metastatic colon adenocarcinoma to the ovary. Unfortunately, the patient succumbed to the aggressive malignancy and did not survive. We therefore aim to accentuate the diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas fomented by ovarian adenocarcinomas that arise secondarily to primary colorectal cancers.

Differentiation between ovarian metastasis from colorectal carcinoma and primary ovarian carcinoma: Evaluation of tumour markers and "mille-feuille sign" on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of serum tumour markers and morphological characteristics in CT/MRI to differentiate between ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinomas (OMCRC) and primary ovarian carcinomas (POC).

METHOD

Preoperative radiological images of 41 OMCRCs from 27 patients (mean age ± SD: 52.2 ± 10.7 years) and 46 POCs from 36 patients (52.1 ± 12.7 years) were included. Three blinded gynecological radiologists classified tumour morphology into 'mille-feuille sign', 'solid and cystic', 'multicystic without nodules', and 'multicystic with nodules' groups and analysed using Fisher's exact test. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were compared by Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

'Mille-feuille sign' indicated OMCRC (OMCRC: 8/41, POC: 1/46, specificity = 0.98, p = 0.011) and had excellent interobserver agreement (Fleiss's kappa value = 0.96). 'Solid and cystic' indicated POC (18/41 vs 41/45, p < 0.001) and 'multicystic without nodules' indicated OMCRC (8/41 vs 2/46, p = 0.041). There was no significant difference in 'multicystic with nodules'. CA125 levels were higher in POCs (292.5 U/mL vs. 41.0 U/mL, p = 0.003). CEA levels were higher in OMCRCs (24.5 ng/mL vs 2 ng/mL, p < 0.001). CEA (< 6.3 ng/mL) AND (CA125 (≥87.0 U/mL) OR 'solid and cystic') indicated POC with high accuracy (3/41 vs 44/46, accuracy = 0.94, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our new method with morphological classification and tumour markers were useful for differentiating the two tumours. In particular, the 'mille-feuille sign' frequently indicated OMCRC with high specificity and excellent interobserver agreement.

Metachronous Ovarian Metastases in a Patient with Primary Colorectal Cancer. A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND Metachronous ovarian metastasis from primary colorectal cancer (CRC) is a rare condition that is diagnosed after the treatment of CRC. In most cases, ovarian metastases present without specific symptoms or signs and are usually diagnosed during follow-up imaging. A rare case is presented of metachronous ovarian metastasis from primary CRC, diagnosed on follow-up by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and includes a review of the literature. CASE REPORT A 66-year-old woman recently underwent a left hemicolectomy for a stage T3, N0, M0 primary adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon, which was completely excised. Three years later, follow-up CT and MRI imaging showed a right ovarian cyst. She underwent exploratory laparotomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which identified tumor in the right ovary. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed metachronous ovarian metastasis from CRC. The patient was referred for further treatment. CONCLUSIONS Newly-diagnosed ovarian metastasis from primary colorectal cancer (CRC) is challenging to diagnose and manage, and may initially be incorrectly diagnosed as malignancy of primary ovarian origin. This case demonstrated that it is important to confirm the diagnosis with imaging, histology, and the appropriate use of tumor markers. Because ovarian metastases do not respond favorably to chemotherapy, the treatment of choice is surgery. However, for women who are treated for CRC, the use of prophylactic oophorectomy remains controversial.