Ovarian Metastases of Colorectal Origin: Treatment Patterns and Factors Affecting Outcomes

An unusual presentation of solitary ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer in an elderly woman: a case report

Background

There have been cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasizing into the ovary. This study reports a case involving solitary ovarian metastasis (OM) from CRC, which is very rare in the absence of other pelvic and peritoneal metastases. This atypical clinical presentation added to the complexity of the diagnosis.

Case Description

We report a case of solitary OM-CRC in a 48-year-old woman. The patient underwent CRC surgery and refused follow-up after three rounds of chemotherapy. Approximately 14 months later, the patient presented with vaginal bleeding for 2 months. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a huge solid cystic mass in the right adnexa. Intraoperatively, the right ovary was found to be enlarged and smooth without adhesions. By careful examination of the abdominal cavity, no metastatic lesions were found in the left ovary and uterus, and no seedings were found in the rest of the pelvis and abdomen. After removal of the uterus and bilateral adnexa, the histologic examination revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the right ovary with a considered rectal carcinoma of origin. Positive staining for multiple tumor-associated markers, which further established the primary nature of CRC. These findings support a possible diagnosis of primary CRC and ovarian metastases. The patient recovered well after the operation and no recurrence or metastasis was seen 18 months after the operation.

Conclusions

Solitary ovarian metastases from CRC can be better managed and treated by increasing clinicians' vigilance for this rare condition. This helps to improve the patient's prognosis and quality of life.

Effect of metastasectomy on the outcome of patients with ovarian metastasis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with ovarian metastasis of colorectal cancer (CROM) usually have poor prognosis. Metastasectomy is controversial in patients with CROM. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of ovarian metastasectomy and other factors in CROM patients.

METHODS

We searched literature up to November 1, 2021 in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Retrospective studies were assessed if survival outcome of CROM patients was reported. Results were pooled in a random-effects model and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 2497 studies screened, 15 studies with 997 patients, published between 2000 and 2021, were included. Longer overall survival (OS) was correlated with ovarian metastasectomy (pooled HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34-0.58, P < 0.05) and R0 resection (pooled HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.16-0.41, P < 0.05). Longer disease-specific survival (DSS) was associated with systematic chemotherapy (pooled HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.15-0.45, P < 0.0001). Shorter OS was associated with extraovarian metastases (pooled HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.68-5.36, P < 0.05) and bilateral OM (pooled HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.09-2.51, P < 0.05). No significant difference in OS was observed among patients with systematic chemotherapy (pooled HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35-1.31, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Metastasectomy achieving R0 resection can significantly prolong OS and DSS of CROM patients as a reasonable treatment modality. Primary tumor resection and systematic chemotherapy can improve patients' outcomes.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022299185 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Vaccinia virus and peptide-receptor radiotherapy synergize to improve treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Tumor-specific overexpression of receptors enables a variety of targeted cancer therapies, exemplified by peptide-receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive neuroendocrine tumors. While effective, PRRT is restricted to tumors with SSTR overexpression. To overcome this limitation, we propose using oncolytic vaccinia virus (vvDD)-mediated receptor gene transfer to permit molecular imaging and PRRT in tumors without endogenous SSTR overexpression, a strategy termed radiovirotherapy. We hypothesized that vvDD-SSTR combined with a radiolabeled somatostatin analog could be deployed as radiovirotherapy in a colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis model, producing tumor-specific radiopeptide accumulation. Following vvDD-SSTR and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC treatment, viral replication and cytotoxicity, as well as biodistribution, tumor uptake, and survival, were evaluated. Radiovirotherapy did not alter virus replication or biodistribution, but synergistically improved vvDD-SSTR-induced cell killing in a receptor-dependent manner and significantly increased the tumor-specific accumulation and tumor-to-blood ratio of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC, making tumors imageable by microSPECT/CT and causing no significant toxicity. ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC significantly improved survival over virus alone when combined with vvDD-SSTR but not control virus. We have therefore demonstrated that vvDD-SSTR can convert receptor-negative tumors into receptor-positive tumors and facilitate molecular imaging and PRRT using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Radiovirotherapy represents a promising treatment strategy with potential applications in a wide range of cancers.

Clinics and pathology of Krukenberg tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Krukenberg tumor (KT) is defined as a secondary neoplasm of the ovary. While ovarian metastases account for about 30% of ovarian tumors, KTs are rare, accounting for about 1-2% of the total. The rarity of KT is at least in part responsible for the lack of a precise clinic-pathological characterization of these tumors. Clinically, KT may have a subtle clinical presentation, with few symptomatic manifestations and nonspecific clinical signs, even though in literature there is disagreement about the clinical presentation of these patients; such difficulties in the diagnostic framework often leads to a delayed diagnosis with serious consequences on the patient outcome. We aimed to provide a clinico-pathological characterization of Krukenberg Tumor (KT) through a systematic review and meta-analysis to improve the diagnosis and management of KT.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Electronic databases were searched for all studies assessing clinico-pathological features of KT series. Pooled prevalence of each clinical or pathological factor was calculated according to the random-effect model.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Forty-eight studies with 3025 KT patients were included; 39.7% of patients were ≥50 and 39.8% were postmenopausal. The most common primary tumor sites were stomach (42.5%), colon-rectum (26.1%), breast (9.3%), and appendix (5%); 48.7% of KTs were synchronous with the primary tumor, 64.3% were bilateral, 40.5% had a diameter ≥10 cm; 55.3% showed extraovarian extent and 49% showed peritoneal involvement. The most common presenting symptoms were ascites (51.7%), palpable mass (31.3%), pain (29.3%), abdominal distention (28.7%), irregular bleeding (9.1%), asymptomatic (11.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

KT shows a highly variable presentation. Understanding the prevalence of clinico-pathological factors may be helpful to improve the diagnosis and management of KT.

Retrospective Analyses of Complete Resection Combined with Systemic Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Patients with Ovarian Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Background: The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer (OM-CRC) treated with complete resection combined with chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Methods: Fifty female patients with OM-CRC who were treated in two different hospitals were categorized into three groups: 14 patients with OM-CRC received resection and chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, 16 patients with OM-CRC only received chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, and 20 patients with non-OM-CRC (NOM-CRC) received chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy. The primary outcomes, including overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and progression-free survival (PFS), were observed. Results: The ORR of OM-CRC was significantly lower compared with NOM-CRC (36.7% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.021), and the DCR of OM-CRC was also lower compared with NOM-CRC (76.7% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.229). The following chemotherapy and targeted therapy in the additional surgical resection of OM-CRC were positively associated with longer PFS and OS compared to no surgical resection (9.0 vs. 6.0 months and 21.0 vs. 15.0 months, respectively, p < 0.001), but the PFS and OS were best in patients with NOM-CRC (9.0 and 35.0 months). Improved OS was associated with R0 resection (23.0 vs. 17.0 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with well-differentiated pathology and unilateral ovarian metastasis had a better prognosis. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary treatment strategy, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and complete surgery, may contribute to the prolongation of OS and be safe for treatment of OM-CRC.

Prognosis and factors affecting colorectal cancer with ovarian metastasis

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. Its incidence has been increasing in recent years, as has the number of cases of ovarian metastasis of colorectal cancer. The prognosis of colorectal cancer with ovarian metastasis is poor, and it is an important cause of death in female patients. A variety of clinicopathological factors were found to be related to the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer with ovarian metastasis, such as menopausal status, metastasis limited to the pelvis, and tumor differentiation. Tumor genetic characteristics also provide a new perspective for the prognostic evaluation of colorectal cancer with ovarian metastasis. The prognosis of ovarian metastasis is also closely associated with treatment. The major treatment methods are prophylactic oophorectomy, surgical resection of the primary and metastatic lesions, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and systematic therapy. If feasible, complete surgical resection of the primary and ovarian metastatic macroscopic lesions combined with postoperative chemotherapy might currently be the most effective treatment for improving the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer with ovarian metastasis. Genetic analysis also provides a theoretical basis for potential targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Metastatic Tumors to the Ovary-a Surgeon's Dilemma

The ovary is a common site of metastasis. Differential diagnosis of ovarian carcinomas, including secondary tumors, remains a challenging task. Clinical decision-making depends on an accurate diagnosis of the type of ovarian cancer. This study was done to evaluate the pattern of metastatic tumors to the ovary and clinical details and to analyze the survival outcomes over a period of 5 years. Patients who had metastatic tumors to the ovary are identified from the electronic database from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2019. Clinical details are collected from the electronic charts. Survival data is collected over the phone. The total number of ovarian cancers treated during the time period was 720, of which primary high-grade mucinous tumors contributed 9 (1.2%), and metastatic tumors to ovary 70 (10%). The highest levels of CEA were seen in carcinoma rectum, colon, and cholangiocarcinoma. CA 19-9 was very high in carcinoma gall bladder, pancreas, and cholangiocarcinoma. Common primaries were stomach (23%), gall bladder (13%), and colon (13%). Adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells was found in 29% of the patients. The median follow-up was 7 months (range 1 to 40 months). The median overall survival was 10 months after diagnosis (95% CI,7.9-12.0). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients who had peritoneal carcinomatosis with enlarged ovaries and those who had metastasis confined to ovaries (p value 0.360). A diagnosis of metastatic tumors to the ovary is associated with a very poor prognosis and the focus of treatment should be to improve the quality of life.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-020-01267-4.

Impact of Ovarian Metastatectomy on Survival Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Ovarian Metastasis: A Retrospective Study

Background

Ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and lacks standard treatment. The benefit of metastatectomy remains to be elucidated. This study was conducted to assess the impact of metastatectomy on survival outcome and explore prognostic factors in ovarian metastatic CRC patients.

Methods

Information of ovarian metastatic CRC patients between January 2008 and December 2017 were collected retrospectively from database of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate disease-specific survival (DSS) after diagnosis of ovarian metastasis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to identify prognostic factors.

Results

Totally, 68 female patients from a cohort of 2170 cases were eligible. The median age at diagnosis was 46.5 years. The median DSS was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.0–29.0 months). Kaplan–Meier analysis and Log rank test showed that complete resection of ovarian metastases (median DSS: 33.0 months) could significantly prolong patients’ survival time, compared with palliative and no resection (median DSS: 20.0 months and 22.0 months, respectively), regardless of systemic chemotherapy (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated regional lymph nodes metastasis of primary tumor (hazard ratio (HR): 3.438, 95% CI: 1.094–10.810, P=0.035), primary tumor resection (HR: 6.436, 95% CI: 1.770–23.399, P=0.005), differentiation grade (HR: 0.272, 95% CI: 0.107–0.693, P=0.006), complete resection of ovarian metastases (vs palliative resection: HR: 17.091, 95% CI: 3.040–96.099, P=0.001; vs no resection: HR: 9.519, 95% CI: 1.581–57.320, P=0.014), and systemic chemotherapy (HR: 3.059, 95% CI: 1.089–8.595 P=0.034) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Complete resection of ovarian metastases could independently predict favorable survival in ovarian metastatic CRC, while palliative resection could not improve patients’ prognosis compared with no resection.

Incidence, risk factors, treatment, and survival of ovarian metastases of colorectal origin: a Dutch population-based study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this nationwide study was to provide insight in the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and survival of patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used. All newly diagnosed female CRC patients between 2008 and 2016 were included. Treatment was categorized as follows: cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC); resection of the primary tumor; palliative treatment; and no treatment. Overall survival (OS) was investigated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 53,883 female CRC patients, 11,343 (21.1%) had metastases at time of diagnosis. Among them, 471 (4.2%) had ovarian metastases. Within latter group, 27.2% received CRS-HIPEC; 38.4% underwent resection of the primary tumor; 25.3% received palliative treatment; and 9.1% received no treatment. Median OS of all patients with ovarian metastases was 17.5 months. In patients receiving CRS-HIPEC, OS was significantly longer than in patients undergoing resection only (median OS 34.1 vs. 17.5 months, adjusted HR 0.44 [0.33-0.66]). Five-year OS was 28.5% for patients having underwent CRS-HIPEC, 11.0% for patients having underwent resection of the primary tumor, 1.2% for patients having underwent palliative treatment, and 0.0% for patients without treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous ovarian metastases are diagnosed in 4.2% of female colorectal patients presenting with metastatic disease. Risk factors are young age, T4/N+ tumor and histology of signet ring cell carcinoma. Median OS of the entire cohort was 17.5 months, ranging from 3.1 months in patients without treatment to 34.1 months in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Prognostic factors in Krukenberg tumor

BACKGROUND

Krukenberg tumor (KT) is a rare secondary ovarian tumor. Little is known about clinicopathologic factors affecting prognosis in KT.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of clinicopathologic factors in KT through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2019 for studies assessing the association of clinicopathologic factors with overall survival in KT. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for each factor; a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 1743 patients were included. A decreased overall survival was significantly associated with peritoneal involvement (HR 1.944; p = 0.003), ascites (HR 2.055; p = 0.034), synchronous presentation (HR 1.679; p = 0.034) and increased serum CEA levels (HR 1.380; p = 0.010), but not with age > 50 (HR 0.946; p = 0.743), menopausal status (HR 1.565; p = 0.204), gastric origin (HR 1.600; p = 0.201), size > 5 cm (HR 1.292; p = 0.119), size > 10 cm (HR 0.925; p = 0.714), bilateral ovarian involvement (HR 1.113; p = 0.347), non-peritoneal extaovarian metastases (HR 1.648; p = 0.237), liver metastases (HR 1.118, p = 0.555), predominant signet ring cell morphology (HR 1.322; p = 0.208) and levels of CA125 (HR 0.933; p = 0.828) and CA19.9 (HR 0.996; p = 0.992).

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal involvement, synchronous presentation, ascites and increased serum CEA levels appear as unfavorable prognostic factors in KT and might affect the patient management.

Treatments and overall survival in patients with Krukenberg tumor

BACKGROUND

Krukenberg tumor (KT) is a rare secondary ovarian tumor, primarily localized at the gastrointestinal tract in most cases. KT is related to severe prognosis due to its aggressiveness, diagnostic difficulties and poor treatment efficacy. Several treatments have been used, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS), adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and/or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). To date, it is still unclear which treatment or combination of treatments is related to better survival.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the most effective therapeutic protocol in terms of overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for all studies assessing the association of treatments with OS in KTs. The effectiveness of each treatment protocol was evaluated by comparing the OS between patients treated with different treatment protocols.

RESULTS

Twenty retrospective studies, with a total sample size of 1533 KTs, were included in the systematic review. Therapeutic protocols used were CRS in 18 studies, CT in 13 studies, HIPEC in 7 studies, neoadjuvant CT in 2 studies, and some combinations of these in 6 studies. Seven studies showed that CRS significantly improved OS compared to other treatments or association of treatments without it. 11 studies showed that CRS without residual (R0 CRS) had a significantly better OS than CRS with residual (R + CRS). Five studies showed that CT significantly improved OS, but other five showed it did not. Two studies showed that HIPEC in association with CRS improved OS, while another study showed that efficacy of HIPEC was comparable to CT. Two studies evaluated neoadjuvant CT, but results were conflicting.

CONCLUSION

CRS and in particular R0 CRS are the treatments showing the clearest results in improving OS in KT patients. Results about CT are conflicting. HIPEC appears effective both alone and in combination with CRS, and also related to fewer adverse effect than CT. The usefulness of neoadjuvant CT is still unclear. The association of R0 CRS with HIPEC seems to be the most effective and safe therapeutic protocol for KT patients.

Ovarian metastases from right colon cancer treated with systemic cancer chemotherapy, a case report

BACKGROUND

The progression of cancer from its primary site has been the focus of study of surgeons and oncologists for many decades. Why the primary disease goes on to take the life of some patients while others live out their normal lives after a surgical procedure is only partially understood.

METHODS

In a patient with caecal cancer metastatic to the right ovary the clinical, radiologic, surgical and histopathologic findings are presented. Efforts were made to confirm that the disease process was from a single primary site (colon cancer) and not two primary sites (colon cancer and ovarian cancer).

RESULTS

In this patient there was progression of ovarian metastases from a right colon cancer simultaneous with near complete disappearance of the primary malignancy. The marked difference in control of the metastatic disease as compared to the primary cancer occurred as multiple treatments of systemic chemotherapy were administered over one year. The specimens of disease removed by surgery showed profound histologic differences at the two sites of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary colon cancer regressed to a small nodule while the ovarian metastases progressed. Efforts to understand and interpret the pathobiology of these observations were made.