Brachytherapy in Head and Neck Cancers: "Are We Doing It or Are We Done with It"

Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck malignancies: oncologic outcomes and morbidity

Objective

Management of recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) is challenging. One option in previously irradiated patients is re-irradiation using interventional radiotherapy (IRT), the modern form of brachytherapy. Re-irradiation using IRT can be delivered as an exclusive strategy for salvage or through a postoperative or perioperative approach after salvage surgery. The aim of the present study is to analyse a bicentric Italian series focusing on the use of IRT as a re-irradiation modality and assess the resulting evidence concerning oncologic outcomes and morbidity.

Methods

This is a retrospective study performed in two referral centres in Italy: Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli in Rome and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria in Sassari. All patients who had previously received a full course of external beam RT and have been re-irradiated using high-dose-rate IRT between December 2010 and June 2023 were included. Patients were retreated either by a combination of surgery and perioperative (either endocavitary or interstitial) IRT or by exclusive interstitial IRT.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included in the present series, 2 of whom underwent more than one IRT re-irradiation. Notably, no patient reported specific IRT-related toxicities. Median follow-up, excluding patients who died of HNC, was 24.5 months. Two-year local relapse-free survival was 26%, disease-specific survival 39.1%, and overall survival 36.6%.

Conclusions

The present series is the largest reported experience of re-irradiation by IRT for HNC in Italy. The very low rate of toxicity confirms IRT as the safest re-irradiation modality. It is noteworthy to underline that IRT is a multidisciplinary strategy based on the close cooperation between surgeons and radiation oncologists during every phase, from the recommendation of treatment and implantation in the operating theatre, to its prescription and dose painting.

Brachytherapy training in India: Results from the GEC-ESTRO-India survey

INTRODUCTION

Brachytherapy (BT) is integral in treatment of gynecological malignancies and is also an option for many other cancers. Data on training and proficiency levels of early career oncologists is limited. Like other continents a survey was conducted for early career oncologists in India.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An online survey was conducted from November 2019 to February 2020, through Association of Radiation Oncologists of India (AROI) for early career radiation oncologists expected to be within 6 years of training. The survey used a 22 item questionnaire that was also used for European survey. Responses to individual statements were recorded on a 1-5 Likert-type scale. Descriptive statistics were used to describe proportions.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-four (17%) of 700 recipients responded to the survey. Majority of the respondents (88%) stated that being able to perform BT at the end of their training was important. Two-thirds of the respondents (81/124) had performed >10 intracavitary procedure and 22.5% had performed >10 intracavitary-interstitial implants. Many respondents had not performed nongynecological procedure- breast (64%), prostate(82%), gastro-intestinal (47%). Respondents predicted that in next 10 years, the role of BT is likely to increase. Lack of dedicated curriculum and training was perceived as the greatest barriers to achieving independence in BT (58%). Respondents suggested that BT training should be prioritized during conferences (73%) and online teaching modules (56%), along with development of BT skills labs (65%).

CONCLUSION

This survey identified a lack of proficiency in gynecological intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy and non-gynecological brachytherapy, despite BT training being regarded as highly important. Dedicated programs, including standardized curriculum and assessment need to be developed for training early- career radiation oncologists in BT.

Nursing management of patients receiving interstitial brachytherapy for head and neck malignancies

Brachytherapy is a type of radiation therapy in which the radioactive source is directly delivered to the tumor and is used to treat a variety of malignancies. Although the local control effect of brachytherapy is higher than that of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), it is often the case that brachytherapy is more invasive than conventional EBRT. As a result, patients receiving head and neck brachytherapy confront several physical, nutritional, and pain management issues. The nurses caring for patients with head and neck cancer receiving high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) should have a thorough understanding of radiation therapy principles, technology, applicator management, and the acute and chronic side effects of ISBT. However, there are no appropriate textbooks or review articles regarding nursing care for head and neck patients undergoing ISBT. The purpose of this article is to provide radiation oncologists and nurses who want to start head and neck ISBT with a comprehensive guide regarding nursing care and to help the wide spread of this treatment strategy.

The combination of volumetric arc radiation therapy and boost high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy for T3N2c tongue cancer: a technical report

Currently, tongue cancers are primarily managed by surgery, and interstitial brachytherapy is only recommended for a selected group of early state T1-2N0 patients who refuse surgery or are medically inoperable. In this report, a case with T3N2cM0 tongue cancer who has been effectively treated by the combination of concurrent chemoradiotherapy involving volumetric arc therapy and boost high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy is presented. Of course, surgery remains the main treatment strategy for tongue cancer patients; however, the authors believe that if volumetric arc therapy is carefully planned to reduce the mandible dose as much as possible and high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy with a mouthpiece that protects the mandible is combined, it is possible to treat T3N2 disease, and this can be considered for patients who want to preserve organ function.

Brachytherapy in India: Learning from the past and looking into the future

India has a longstanding tradition in the practice of brachytherapy and has actively contributed to the scientific literature by conducting prospective studies, clinical audits, developing innovative techniques, and performing randomized studies. Indian investigators have also contributed to international collaborative research, education, training programs along with guideline development for brachytherapy in cervix and head and neck cancers. The present article summarizes the key contributions to scientific literature, current infrastructure, skill set for brachytherapy, existing challenges, and strategy to further strengthen brachytherapy practice in the next decade.

A national surveillance study of the current status of reirradiation using brachytherapy in Japan

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the current status and pattern of practice for reirradiation using brachytherapy (ReRT-BT) through a survey in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We distributed an e-mail-based questionnaire to 153 institutions equipped with high-dose-rate brachytherapy facilities.

RESULTS

We received responses from 76 institutions (49.7%). Forty-three of these institutions performed ReRT-BT and 42 institutions (55%) performed ReRT-BT during 2009-2018. However, 29 of the 42 institutions (69%) reported difficulty in obtaining ReRT-BT case information from their respective databases. Almost all the institutions encountered insufficient database system to extract details about the ReRT-BT cases. Responses from 33 institutions included the number of ReRT-BT cases; this increased from 90 in the period 2009-2013 (institution median = 0.5; 0-16) to 172 in the period 2014-2018 (institution median = 2; 0-26). Nine institutions had to perform ReRT-BT for more than one case per year. The major location for cancer treatment was the pelvis (94%), followed by the head and neck (5%) and others (1%). In six site-specific scenarios, barring uterine corpus cancer recurrence, more than 90% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform ReRT-BT, whereas other areas (head and neck, prostate, and rectal cancer) gained 16-37% agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

This decade saw an increase in the number of ReRT-BT cases in Japan and radiation oncologists' interest in ReRT-BT as a viable therapeutic option. However, scarce availability, immature education system, and insufficient database system are barriers to further consensus building.