Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at Low-Volume Centre in Tier-II City of India

Surgeon's Experience May Circumvent Operative Volume in Improving Early Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Introduction Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex procedure with a significant proportion of postoperative complications and improving but notable mortality. PD was the prototype procedure that initiated the lingering debate about the relationship of better operative outcomes when performed at higher-volume centers. This has not translated into practice. Impediments include the absence of a universally accepted definition of a high-volume center among others. Contrary evidence suggests equivalent outcomes for PD at low-volume centers when performed by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons. We reviewed our perioperative outcomes for PD from an earlier period as a low-volume center with an experienced team. Methods A longitudinal study of all PDs completed in our department between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Results A total of 28 PD were performed during this period. Pylorus-preserving PD was performed in 23 patients and classical PD in the remaining. A separate Roux-en-Y loop was used for high-risk pancreatic anastomosis in six cases. The mean patient age was 49.3±12.4 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.3:1. Preoperative drainage procedures were carried out in 19 patients. The mean serum total bilirubin level was 3.98(±4.5) mg/dL. There was no 90-day mortality. Postoperative complications included wound infection in 10 (36.7%) and respiratory complications in 10 (36.7%) patients. Postoperative bleeding requiring intervention occurred in one patient, and two patients had an anastomotic leak (one pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) and one gastrojejunostomy (GJ)). Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was noted in three (10.7%) patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 14±7 days. The median overall survival (OS) was 84 months. Conclusion Comparable early outcomes can be achieved at low-volume centers for patients undergoing PD with an experienced team, optimal patient selection, and the ability to rescue for complications.

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy: A Northeast Indian tertiary cancer center study

Background and Aim

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is an important cause of major morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We intend to estimate the incidence and study the risk factors and outcomes of patients who developed this dreaded complication.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. We included all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a specialized surgical unit of a single tertiary care cancer center in Northeast India. The period of study was from 23 April 2012 to 27 December 2019. The 2016 update on the definition of POPF by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula was used to define the complication. Chi‐square test and Fischer's exact test were applied to categorical variables. t‐test was used to quantify mean difference among continuous variables. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.

Results

A total of 59 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy during the study period with almost equal distribution among males and females (29 and 30 patients respectively). The mean age of the patients was 54.0 years (range 20–72). Grade A, B, and C pancreatic fistulas were seen in five (8.5%), three (5.1%), and two (3.4%) patients, respectively. Preoperative hyperbilirubinemia, pancreatic duct size ≤3 mm, hypoalbuminemia, preoperative biliary decompression, and prolonged duration of surgery were identified as risk factors for POPF. POPF also resulted in increased 90‐day mortality (20%).

Conclusion

POPF remains a potentially life‐threatening complication of pancreaticoduodenectomies. The knowledge and management of modifiable risk factors for this condition may help in mitigating this problem.

Twelve Hundred Consecutive Pancreato-Duodenectomies from Single Centre: Impact of Centre of Excellence on Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Across India

BACKGROUND

Pancreato-duodenectomy (PD) is a technically challenging operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Over the period of time, Tata Memorial Centre has evolved into a high-volume centre for management of pancreatic cancer. Aim of this study is to report the short- and long-term outcomes of 1200 consecutive PDs performed at single tertiary cancer centre in India.

METHODS

1200 PDs were performed from 1992 to 2017. Prospectively maintained database was used to retrospectively assess the short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Study cohort was divided into periods A and B (500 and 700 patients, respectively). Both groups were comparable for demographic variables. Overall morbidity and mortality in entire cohort were 31.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Period B documented significant reduction in post-operative mortality (5.4% vs 2.8%), post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (5.8% vs 3%) and bile leaks (3.4% vs 1.3%). However, incidence of delayed gastric emptying and clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula was higher in period B. With median follow-up of 25 months, 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival for patients with pancreatic cancer were 43.7% and 38.7%, respectively, and that for periampullary tumours were 65.9% and 59.4%, respectively. Period B also corresponded with dissemination of technical expertise across diverse regions of India with specialised training of 35 surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of delivering high-quality care in a dedicated high-volume centre even in a country with low incidence of pancreatic cancer with marked disparities in medical care and socio-economic conditions. Improved outcomes underscore the need to promote regionalisation via a dedicated training programme.

Centralisation of Pancreatoduodenectomy in India: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

The volume-outcome relationship dictates that high-volume centres lead to improved patient outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). We conducted a retrospective review to fathom the situation in India for PD and whether referral to high-volume centres would make a positive impact.

METHOD

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed, and all articles published from Indian centres from 01.03.2008 to 30.11.2019 were scrutinised. Any series with less than 20 patients, case reports, abstracts, unpublished data and personal communications were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 36 unique series including 6226 patients from 24 institutes across India were identified. Amongst the 24 institutes, 2 institutes reported less than 10 cases/year, 11 reported 10-25 cases/year and 11 reported ≥26 cases/year. Overall perioperative morbidity was 42.4%, 43.4% and 41% for centres doing <10, 10-25 and ≥26 cases/year, respectively. Operative mortality also improved with increasing number of cases/year (5.1% vs. 6.6% vs. 3.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

With increasing volume of cases per year, trend towards improved PD outcomes is observed. To optimise the use of healthcare facilities, it would be pragmatic to consider building an organised referral system for complex surgeries to deliver unsurpassed patient care with maximum utilisation of the available healthcare infrastructure.

Nursing interventions to reduce surgical site infection in potentially contaminated surgeries: an integrative review

Objective: Identify nursing interventions that contribute to the reduction of surgical site infections in potentially contaminated surgeries. Methods: Integrative review, carried out in four databases. There were 5,888 articles published in the period from January 2008 to July 2018, in English, Portuguese and Spanish, from which nine articles were selected after final analysis. Results: The nursing interventions appeared according to the perioperative periods: preoperative (55.55%), intraoperative (33.33%), postoperative (66.66%), being associated with: antibiotic therapy, trichotomy, alcoholic chlorhexidine bathing, hand hygiene, sterile glove/wear/ package change for fascia and skin closure, degermination, antisepsis, surgical classification, surgical time, care with dressings and drains, temperature and blood glucose control, patient education, discharge and post-hospital discharge orientation. Conclusions: Nursing interventions were identified in each perioperative period, proving to be essential for the qualification of nursing care and effective in reducing surgical site infection in potentially contaminated surgeries.

Intervenções de enfermagem para reduzir infecção do sítio cirúrgico em cirurgias potencialmente contaminadas: revisão integrativa

Objetivo: Identificar as intervenções de enfermagem que contribuem para a redução das infecções de sítio cirúrgico (ISCs) em cirurgias potencialmente contaminadas. Métodos: Revisão integrativa, realizada em quatro bases de dados. Foram encontrados 5.888 artigospublicados no período de janeiro de 2008 a julho de 2018, nos idiomas inglês, português e espanhol, sendo selecionados nove artigos após análise final. Resultados: As intervenções de enfermagem apareceram conforme os períodos perioperatórios: pré-operatório (55,55%), intraoperatório (33,33%) e pós-operatório (66,66%), estando associadas à: antibioticoterapia, tricotomia, banho de clorexidina alcoólica, higiene das mãos, troca de luva estéril/vestimenta/pacote para fechamento da fáscia e da pele, degermação, antissepsia, classificação cirúrgica, tempo cirúrgico, cuidados com curativos e drenos, controle de temperatura e glicemia, educação do paciente, orientações na alta e pós-alta hospitalar. Conclusões: As intervenções de enfermagem foram identificadas em cada período do perioperatório, mostrando-se essenciais para a qualificação da assistência de enfermagem e eficazes na redução da infecção do sítio cirúrgicos em cirurgias potencialmente contaminadas.