Anorectal Malignant Melanoma-Defining the Optimal Surgical Treatment and Prognostic Factors. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018;9:519-523. [PMID: 30538382 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0791-1]

Anorectal Malignant Melanoma Post- Hemorrhoidectomy

Anorectal malignant melanoma, a rare and aggressive tumor, lacks specific symptoms and frequently presents diagnostic challenges due to its similarity to benign anorectal conditions. This case report describes the diagnostic and treatment process of incidentally discovered anorectal malignant melanoma post-hemorrhoidectomy, guided by the existing literature.

Is repeat wide excision plus radiotherapy of localized rectal melanoma another choice before abdominoperineal resection? A case report

BACKGROUND

Rectal melanoma is an uncommon neoplasm that accounts for approximately 1 percent of rectal cancer cases. Abdominoperineal resection was regarded as the radical procedure for disease control. Nevertheless, it led to more postoperative complications than sphincter-sparing wide local excision (WLE) and reduced the patient’s quality of life (QOL) owing to creation of colostomy. Therefore, in this study, WLE, radiotherapy (RT), and a second WLE were conducted on a patient who had been diagnosed with localized rectal melanoma.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient was a 79-year-old woman who had been experiencing anal pain and bloody stool for 1 mo. Colonoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography–computed tomography, and histological analysis of tissue biopsy using the histological markers Melan-A (+), S-100 (+), and Ki-67 (+, 50%) lead to the diagnosis of localized rectal melanoma. The patient had initially undergone WLE to resolve problem of anal bleeding, followed by RT to treat the residual lesion with partial response. Subsequently, the residual lesion was removed with margin-free resection by the second WLE. The patient’s postoperative course was smooth and uneventful. During the 2-year follow-up, no local recurrence was observed. Additionally, a good functional outcome and improved QOL were reported.

CONCLUSION

Combining WLE, RT, and repeat WLE is proposed as a viable alternative for treating rectal melanoma accompanied by bleeding symptoms that cannot be completely resected at the beginning.

Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without lymph node removal and preservation of the rectum) and extensive resection (procedures with rectum and pararectal lymph node removal). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival of patients who underwent extensive resection with that of patients who underwent local excision, stratifying patients according to tumour stage.

Methods

A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published until March 2021. Studies comparing survival outcomes in patients with anorectal melanoma who underwent local excision versus extensive resection were screened for eligibility. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival after the different surgical approaches, stratified by tumour stage.

Results

There were 347 studiesidentified of which 34 were included for meta-analysis with a total of 1858 patients. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgical approaches in patients per stage (stage I odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 2.72, P = 0.49); stage II odds ratio 1.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 4.18, P = 0.33); stage I–III odds ratio 1.19 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.70, P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the time intervals (<2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2021) and for continent of study origin. Subgroup analysis for time interval and continent of origin also showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival.

Conclusion

No significant survival benefit exists for patients with anorectal melanoma treated with local excision or extensive resection, independent of tumour stage.

Clinical and oncological outcomes of surgery in Anorectal melanoma in Asian population: A 15 year analysis at a tertiary cancer institute

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is an aggressive malignancy with dismal prognosis and a 5-year survival rate less than 20% in most of the previous studies. The ideal surgical treatment has still remained controversial. This retrospective study aims at analysing the outcome in patients with ARMM treated with curative surgical resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 38 patients of stage I anorectal malignant melanoma treated with curative surgical resection at our tertiary cancer institute.

RESULTS

WLE (Wide Local Excision) was carried out in 12 patients and APR (abdominoperineal resection) was done in 26 patients. The median overall survival of the entire group in this study was 20 months. Although the median overall survival of WLE patients was higher than those with APR (37 months versus 16 months, respectively), this was not a statistically significant event (P=0.317). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were similar with both APR and WLE with no significant difference in the 5-year survival rate (P=0.816); overall 5-year survival rate of just 13%. There were 3 long-term survivors in this study group who survived for more than 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Most patients ultimately succumb to the disease regardless of the management. Both APR and WLE have significant roles in the management depending on the subset of patients selected. Local treatment should be preferred wherever possible. Abdominoperineal resection should be offered in nodal disease or in a recurrent setting.

Survival following surgical treatment for anorectal melanoma seems similar for local excision and extensive resection regardless of nodal involvement

BACKGROUND

Anorectal melanoma is a rare malignancy with a dismal prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the survival per stage is influenced by the surgical approaches (local excision or extensive resection), to assess prognostic factors of survival, and to answer the question whether the practiced surgical approaches changed over time.

METHODS

Dutch cancer registry organizations (IKNL and PALGA) were queried for all patients with a diagnosis of anorectal melanoma (1989-2019). Patients with disseminated disease at diagnosis were excluded. Survival outcomes were compared for the two surgical approaches stratified by stage (clinical node negative (cN0) and clinical node positive (cN+)) and date of diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included in this study. In both cN0 and cN+ patients the surgical strategy did not significantly influence survival (cN0: 21.7% 5-year survival, median 25 months for local excision versus 13.7% 5-year survival, median 17 months for extensive resection (p = 0.228), cN+: 11.1% 5-year survival for local excision, median 17 months versus 8.7% 5-year survival, median 14 months for extensive resection (p = 0.741)). Stage and date of diagnosis showed to be prognostic factors of survival. The ratio between the two surgical approaches was unchanged over three decades.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive resection does not seem to improve survival in both cN0 and cN+ anorectal melanoma patients compared to local excision. However in the past three decades no shift towards local excision has been found. cN+ stage and an older date of diagnosis are predictors for worse survival.

Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature

BACKGROUND

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Evidence on optimal treatment is limited and surgical management varies widely. We hypothesized that the frequency of abdominoperineal resection used as primary treatment of ARM has decreased over the past several decades.

AIM

To update our understanding of outcomes for patients with ARM and analyze management trends around the world.

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients treated for ARM at 7 hospitals. Hospitals included both large, academic, tertiary care centers and smaller, general community hospitals. Using prospectively maintained institutional tumor registries, we identified 24 patients diagnosed with ARM between January 2000 and May 2019. We analyzed factors prognostic for recurrence and survival. We then used Cox regression to measure overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival. We also performed a literature review to assess trends in surgical management and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients diagnosed with ARM, 12 (50.0%) had local, 8 (33.3%) regional, and 4 (16.7%) distant disease at diagnosis. Median time to recurrence was 10.4 mo [interquartile range (IQR) 7.5-17.2] with only 2 patients (9.3%) not developing recurrence following surgical resection. Median OS was 18.8 mo (IQR 13.5-33.9). One patient is still alive without recurrence at 21.4 mo from diagnosis; no other patient survived 5 years. Primary surgical management with abdominoperineal resection (APR) vs wide excision (WE) did not lead to differences in OS [hazard ratio = 1.4 (95%CI: 0.3-6.8)]. Review of the literature revealed geographic differences in surgical management of ARM, with increased use of WE in the United States and Europe over time and more frequent use of APR in Asia and India. There was no significant improvement in survival over time.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in the management of ARM and survival outcomes remain poor regardless of approach. Surgical management should aim to minimize morbidity.