Essentials for Pathological Evaluation of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies and Synoptic Reporting of Cytoreductive Surgery Specimens-A review and evidence-based guide

Histopathological Evaluation and Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Peritoneal Metastases with Unknown Primary Site-a Review

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a well-studied entity with guidelines available for the management of patients with CUP. The peritoneum represents one of the metastatic sites in CUP, and peritoneal metastases (PM) could present as CUP. PM of unknown origin remains a poorly studied clinical entity. There is only one series of 15 cases, one population-based study, and few other case reports on this subject. Studies on CUP, in general, cover some common tumour histological types like adenocarcinomas and squamous carcinomas. Some of these tumours may have a good prognosis though majority have high-grade disease with a poor long-term outcome. Some of the histological tumour types commonly seen in the clinical scenario of PM like mucinous carcinoma have not been studied. In this review, we divide PM into five histological types-adenocarcinomas, serous carcinomas, mucinous carcinomas, sarcomas and other rare varieties. We provide algorithms to identify the primary tumour site using immunohistochemistry when imaging, and endoscopy fails to establish the primary tumour site. The role of molecular diagnostic tests for PM or unknown origin is also discussed. Current literature on site-specific systemic therapy based on gene expression profiling does not show a clear benefit of this approach over empirical systemic therapies.

Analysis of the Diagnostic Effect of EUS-RTE on Giant Cystic Tumours of the Oesophagus Based on Cluster Analysis

This paper presents an in-depth analysis and study of the diagnostic effectiveness of EUS-RTE in giant cystic tumours of the oesophagus utilizing cluster analysis. A new form of interval data expression was designed based on the cluster analysis algorithm, as well as a new way of updating the cluster radius and cluster centre. Feature triads are defined, eliminating the need to access all historical data at the time of update. It also prevents the case of overfusion of clusters and outputting only one cluster. If there exist a very low number of clusters, the newly merged clusters are reclustered according to the density clustering method for the internal data objects based on the cluster segmentation so that the data objects in the same cluster have a high similarity as possible. All accumulated electronic files of oesophageal cancer cases were collected and comprehensively organized, and all clinical data of 129 eligible cases with a total of 356 consultations were screened in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria. A database of oesophageal cancer cases was established using Visual FoxPro software, and frequency distribution, cluster analysis, association rule, and chi-square test were used to focus on mining the association between symptoms, disease mechanisms, prescriptions, and medications. The results were analysed and summarized. Overall, the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the three groups of treatment modalities for gastric mesenchymal tumours were positive, and the preoperative endoscopic treatment modalities should be selected based on the EUS-RTE characteristics of the tumour, the site, and the operator's skill level in a comprehensive manner.

Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumours treated by cytoreductive surgery: study protocol of a prospective, multicentre, observational study

INTRODUCTION

Despite optimal patient selection and surgical effort, recurrence is seen in over 70% of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal metastases (PM). Apart from the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction and tumour grade, there are other factors like disease distribution in the peritoneal cavity, pathological response to systemic chemotherapy (SC), lymph node metastases and morphology of PM which may have prognostic value. One reason for the underutilisation of these factors is that they are known only after surgery. Identifying clinical predictors, specifically radiological predictors, could lead to better utilisation of these factors in clinical decision making and the extent of peritoneal resection performed for different tumours. This study aims to study these factors, their impact on survival and identify clinical and radiological predictors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

There is no therapeutic intervention in the study. All patients with biopsy-proven PM from colorectal, appendiceal, gastric and ovarian cancer and peritoneal mesothelioma undergoing CRS will be included. The demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological details will be collected according to a prespecified format that includes details regarding distribution of disease, morphology of PM, regional node involvement and pathological response to SC. In addition to the absolute value of PCI, the structures bearing the largest tumour nodules and a description of the morphology in each region will be recorded. A correlation between the surgical, radiological and pathological findings will be performed and the impact of these potential prognostic factors on progression-free and overall survival determined. The practices pertaining to radiological and pathological reporting at different centres will be studied.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol has been approved by the Zydus Hospital ethics committee (27 July, 2020) and Lyon-Sud ethics committee (A15-128).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2020/09/027709; Pre-results.

Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of a Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Results of a Prospective Multi-center Study

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases who have a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy experience a significantly longer survival than those with residual disease. This response is known only after surgery. This study aimed to examine clinical and radiologic predictors of a pCR.

METHODS

From July 2018 to December 2019, the study prospectively enrolled 120 patients. The clinical and radiologic findings were compared between patients with and without a pCR. A protocol for pathologic evaluation was followed.

RESULTS

A pCR was observed in 34 patients (28.3%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that patients with a surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index (sPCI) of 3 or lower had an 80% probability of experiencing a pCR, and that patients with a radiologic PCI (rPCI) of 2 or lower had a 70% probability of experiencing a pCR. A pCR was correctly predicted for 47% of the patients by imaging and for 44.4% of the patients by surgical evaluation. The site of primary tumor, the timing of peritoneal metastasis (PM), histology, tumor marker positivity, and mutations in known poor prognostic genes (KRAS) did not differ between the patients with and those without pCR. The primary tumor showed residual disease in 23.5% and regional nodes in 26.4% of the patients with pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

The rPCI and sPCI concurred with a pCR in less than 50% of the patients. The patients with a lower PCI had greater concordance. An sPCI of 3 or lower was predictive of a pCR in 80% of the patients. The impact of KRAS mutations on pCR should be evaluated in a larger series. The predictors of pCR and response to systemic chemotherapy should be incorporated in prognostic scores used to select patients for surgery.

The Pathologic Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) Strongly Differs From the Surgical PCI in Peritoneal Metastases Arising From Various Primary Tumors

BACKGROUND

The surgical peritoneal cancer index (sPCI) is calculated based on a subjective evaluation of the extent of peritoneal disease during surgery. The pathologic PCI (pPCI) may be a more accurate and objective method for determining the PCI. This study aimed to compare the sPCI and pPCI and to study the potential pitfalls and clinical implications of using the pPCI.

METHODS

This prospective study (July to December 2018) included all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The pPCI was calculated for each patient and compared with the sPCI. The impact of potential confounding factors on the difference between pPCI and sPCI was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 191 patients undergoing CRS at four centers, the pPCI and sPCI were concordant for 37 patients (19.3%). The pPCI was lower than the sPCI for 125 patients (65.4%) and higher for 29 patients (15.1%). The concordance between the two groups was maximum for gastric cancer (38.8%) and colorectal cancer (27.6%) and least for mesothelioma (6.7%) and rare primary tumors (5.6%) (p = 0.04). The difference was 0 to 3 points for 119 patients (62.3%), 4 to 5 points for 27 patients (14.1%), and more than 5 points for 45 patients (23.5%). The rate of concordance was not influenced by the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.4), but the difference was greater when NACT was used (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The pPCI strongly differs from the sPCI for patients undergoing CRS for peritoneal disease and may provide a more accurate evaluation of the peritoneal disease extent. Further studies are needed to determine its prognostic value compared with sPCI, and consensus guidelines are needed for calculating it.

Pathological assessment of cytoreductive surgery specimens and its unexplored prognostic potential-a prospective multi-centric study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The grade/histological subtype is one of the most important prognostic markers in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Our aim was to study other potential prognostic information that can be derived from the pathological evaluation of CRS specimens and provide a broad outline for evaluation of these.

METHODS

This prospective study (July to December 2018) included all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS). A protocol for pathological evaluation was laid down which was based on existing practices at the participating centers and included evaluation of the pathological PCI, regional node involvement, response to chemotherapy, morphology of peritoneal metastases (PM) and distribution in the peritoneal cavity.

RESULTS

In 191 patients undergoing CRS at 4 centers, the pathological and surgical PCI differed in over 75%. Nodes in relation to peritoneal disease were positive in 13.6%. Disease in normal peritoneum adjacent to tumor nodules was seen in >50% patients with ovarian cancer and mucinous apppendiceal tumors. 23.8% of evaluated colorectal PM patients had a complete response and 25.0% ovarian cancer patients had a near complete pathological response to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological evaluation of extent and distribution of peritoneal disease differs from the surgical evaluation in majority of the patients. Lymph node involvement in relation of peritoneal disease is common. The morphological presentation of PM in ovarian cancer and mucinous appendiceal tumors merits evaluation of more extensive resections in these patients. Standardized methods of synoptic reporting of CRS specimens could help capture vital prognostic information that may in future influence how these patients are treated.