A Prospective Study on Level of Concordance Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimen for Assessing Oestrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Her2/Neu Receptor Status in Carcinoma Breast and Its Implications on Treatment Decisions

Her2 Status Discrepancy Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgically Resected Mastectomy Specimen: A Clinical Case

The biomarker concordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical specimen (SS), in breast cancer, has long been a matter of discussion because of its influence on oncologic treatment choice. Particularly, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) status is quite important, because of the impact on breast cancer classification and target therapy. Many factors could influence the difference in biomarker status between samples, such as the technic itself, sample procedures and intratumoral heterogeneity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can also contribute to this variation and should be taken into consideration. We report a clinical case of a 33-year-old man who was diagnosed with right breast cancer, initially Her2 negative in the CNB. Therefore, the NAC was completed without anti-Her2 treatment. Later, after the mastectomy, revision of the SS was found to be positive for Her2, after the silver in situ hybridization (SISH) technique. Consequently, the patient lost the chance of doing anti-Her2 therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, reducing his possibility to achieve a complete pathologic response and later jeopardizing his clinical outcome.

Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision specimens for Ki-67 in breast cancer - a systematic review of the literature

AIMS

The biomarkers oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are routinely measured in patients with breast cancer with international consensus on how they should be interpreted. There is evidence to support use of other biomarkers to give more detailed predictive and prognostic information. Ki-67 is one example, and measures the proliferative activity of cancer cells. It is important that this can be performed at diagnosis of breast cancer for patients who do not have initial surgical treatment (mainly older women) and those receiving neoadjuvant therapies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review was performed to assess concordance of measurement of Ki-67 between core needle biopsy (CNB) samples and surgical excision (SE) samples in patients with invasive breast cancer. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. Studies were eligible if performed within the last 10 years; included quantitative measurement of Ki-67 in both CNB and SE samples with no prior breast cancer treatment; measured concordance between two samples; and had full text available. A total of 22 studies, including 5982 paired CNB and SE samples on which Ki-67 was measured, were appraised. Overall, there appeared to be concordance; however, reliability was unclear. Where given, the Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) of correlation between samples ranged from 0.261 to 0.712. The concordance rate between CNB and SE where measured as a percentage had a range from 70.3 to 92.7% CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of level of concordance of Ki-67 between CNB and SE samples is hampered by different methodologies. International consensus on Ki-67 measurement is urgently needed.